- 12 - D7.png (50.77 KiB) Viewed 901 times
- 12 - D7(t).png (2.55 KiB) Viewed 901 times
- GYBE-missif2.png (3.18 KiB) Viewed 901 times
Moderator: Community Team
Not a fan. I'm considering a Marmot/LoRab mafia team, because it's too late in the game to be concerned with voting for an insanified player. I'll look into their posts to see if I can substantiate that suspicion more conclusively.LoRab wrote:Put my vote on G-Man for now. I will sort of be on, so I could be convinced to change it, if I am able to see posts and not be paying attention to meeting. Minly because I don't want to vote for MM because I'm too iffy on that. And because I'm finding his posts more suspicious than sig's. And anyone else on this poll, I feel pretty good about. So, ironically, it's kind of process of elimination.
I voted DrWilgy when I posted about birds (12 days of fuck that holiday), but you posted a smiley that suggested I shouldn't do that, so I went back to G-Man.Metalmarsh89 wrote:I can't believe you lynched him!
I'll be on to address things later.
I can't imagine they'd have civilian BTSC considering LoRab's recent behavior. Even if she's unwilling to place a meaningful MM vote, casting suspicion on him at all like she has would seem counterproductive to that cause.Quin wrote:3J, does that analysis lead you to think they could be a mafia/mafia team, or could they just share BTSC?
Not off the top of my head. I'll have a more thorough look at it tomorrow when we know where we're standing with living players and night kills.JaggedJimmyJay wrote:It might be worth doing more analyses like that one. It proved very effective for me late in Mad Max when I was trying to isolate the last two mafia members by team-oriented process of elimination. There are probably too many possible combinations in this array of players for that to be practical, but I might be able to narrow down some of the more likely possibilities.
From there I pose a general question to whoever:
Can you name two players who you believe are definitely not baddie teammates? Name as many combinations as come to mind.
I don't like giving you ideas about whom to kill.JaggedJimmyJay wrote:Can you name two players who you believe are definitely not baddie teammates? Name as many combinations as come to mind.
I'm finding it more difficult to come up with these than I anticipated. The only combination that I think looks unlikely at face value is Epignosis/Marmot, because I do think Epi has made a real effort to lynch him. I could narrow it down further by eliminating town reads, but there aren't many of those frankly and it would still leave me with way too many analyses. Meh.Quin wrote:Not off the top of my head. I'll have a more thorough look at it tomorrow when we know where we're standing with living players and night kills.
Great opportunity for you to talk about this:Epignosis wrote:I don't like giving you ideas about whom to kill.JaggedJimmyJay wrote:Can you name two players who you believe are definitely not baddie teammates? Name as many combinations as come to mind.
JaggedJimmyJay wrote:Nobody has addressed this:
If I'm the SK, trice didn't merely out me. He tried his best to lynch me too, otherwise unprovoked and unpressured. Explain that to me. I think there's a readily visible motive for him to erroneously paint me as the SK*, but there is not a readily visible motive for him to try to lead the lynch of the player upon whom one of his win conditions rests. If you accept that reality, that means you accept that trice didn't care about winning the game. You accept that trice screwed his potential teammate over to no gain of his own.JaggedJimmyJay wrote:A point about the trice controversy that I'm not sure has been adequately addressed:
Those who think I'm the SK and trice exposed me -- do you assert that trice wasn't genuinely trying as hard as he could to get me lynched?
*even without having been recruited, he can still play in a way that anticipates recruitment. By screaming and yelling about the SK he is by default revealing himself to the true SK that it's a role he is placing inordinate focus on -- that serves as a signal and can facilitate the recruitment. By focusing that screaming and yelling on someone who is not the SK (me), he ensures that when his role is publicly revealed, he doesn't expose both himself and his teammate. Any suspicions originating from that reveal are directed upon me and my false lynch safeguards them both.
So, everyone who has defaulted to the notion that I am the SK because trice said so -- it is your responsibility to answer this. Off-hand I can name: Epignosis and Dom. Marmot and LoRab too, though their suspicion has been less SK-focused. Those who are cursed I understand you can't answer now. Do it later.
Thanks for reminding me.JaggedJimmyJay wrote:Great opportunity for you to talk about this:Epignosis wrote:I don't like giving you ideas about whom to kill.JaggedJimmyJay wrote:Can you name two players who you believe are definitely not baddie teammates? Name as many combinations as come to mind.
JaggedJimmyJay wrote:Nobody has addressed this:
If I'm the SK, trice didn't merely out me. He tried his best to lynch me too, otherwise unprovoked and unpressured. Explain that to me. I think there's a readily visible motive for him to erroneously paint me as the SK*, but there is not a readily visible motive for him to try to lead the lynch of the player upon whom one of his win conditions rests. If you accept that reality, that means you accept that trice didn't care about winning the game. You accept that trice screwed his potential teammate over to no gain of his own.JaggedJimmyJay wrote:A point about the trice controversy that I'm not sure has been adequately addressed:
Those who think I'm the SK and trice exposed me -- do you assert that trice wasn't genuinely trying as hard as he could to get me lynched?
*even without having been recruited, he can still play in a way that anticipates recruitment. By screaming and yelling about the SK he is by default revealing himself to the true SK that it's a role he is placing inordinate focus on -- that serves as a signal and can facilitate the recruitment. By focusing that screaming and yelling on someone who is not the SK (me), he ensures that when his role is publicly revealed, he doesn't expose both himself and his teammate. Any suspicions originating from that reveal are directed upon me and my false lynch safeguards them both.
So, everyone who has defaulted to the notion that I am the SK because trice said so -- it is your responsibility to answer this. Off-hand I can name: Epignosis and Dom. Marmot and LoRab too, though their suspicion has been less SK-focused. Those who are cursed I understand you can't answer now. Do it later.
I already did. I can only speculate, but I do think an answer is available to those who are willing to look for it: even an unrecruited trice is likely to play the game in a way that anticipates recruitment. He has to signal the serial killer in some way or another to facilitate that since the SK is the one looking for him. It looks to me that trice's choice method of providing that signal was to point the SK finger at me and make it his loud crusade.Epignosis wrote:Thanks for reminding me.
I think trice is illogical, angry, and does not do things the same way you or I would. I know him from a music forum, but my mafia experience with him is limited. I don't know what he would do thrust into the role he was. It's unprecedented. He did call you the serial killer. Why would he do that if you weren't? You answer that one.
I don't believe you're a civilian Jay. I don't.
The first place trice went after the Golden kill was to insinuate that I was guilty of killing him. This is where his attacks on me began that day, at the very beginning of the phase, before any pressure had fallen on trice himself. There is no urgency for votes to be moved, there is no subtle signaling, there is only trice casting suspicion upon me which quickly developed into "JJJ is the SK".triceratopzeuhl wrote:biggest change in Golden's theories over the course of day 3 was JJJ from Moderate Town & less likely than sloonei to be bad, to worried about JJJ
''JaggedJimmyJay wrote:I already did. I can only speculate, but I do think an answer is available to those who are willing to look for it: even an unrecruited trice is likely to play the game in a way that anticipates recruitment. He has to signal the serial killer in some way or another to facilitate that since the SK is the one looking for him. It looks to me that trice's choice method of providing that signal was to point the SK finger at me and make it his loud crusade.Epignosis wrote:Thanks for reminding me.
I think trice is illogical, angry, and does not do things the same way you or I would. I know him from a music forum, but my mafia experience with him is limited. I don't know what he would do thrust into the role he was. It's unprecedented. He did call you the serial killer. Why would he do that if you weren't? You answer that one.
I don't believe you're a civilian Jay. I don't.
Doing this has a couple of effects for trice that can serve to his benefit:
1.) Making the SK chase a purposeful focus in his public behavior can itself serve as a signal to the true SK that he/she should check trice during a Night phase.
2.) In the event that the recruitment resolves successfully and his role is revealed, there isn't an obvious incriminating problem for both he and his potential partner (as there would be in a scenario where I'm the SK). He has glued himself to the wrong person, and in the event that I am lynched afterword that bond is severed by my non-SK flip. The two of them then have a real route to win the game.
3.) If he succeeds in his attempt to lynch me on Day 4, the bond is severed before he is recruited and he doesn't lose anything other than the negative credit for my civilian flip (and he may well have even suspected I was mafia). The only risk he endures then is someone other than the SK picking up on his signal and theorizing such publicly -- a problem that I don't think he'd find particularly frightening.
There's my answer. I think my question was an important one that needs to be addressed in a way more thorough than "I don't know, I'm not trice". Why did he try to lynch me on Day 4? Why was his first move on Day 4 to make a clear motion against me before he was under any pressure himself, one that progressed quickly into him yelling that I am the serial killer? That's not a player being "illogical and angry" -- that's a player throwing the game for himself. Do you believe that trice threw the game for himself?
Trice was pissed at you.JaggedJimmyJay wrote:Trice's second post of Day 4
Trice's third post of Day 4:
The first place trice went after the Golden kill was to insinuate that I was guilty of killing him. This is where his attacks on me began that day, at the very beginning of the phase, before any pressure had fallen on trice himself. There is no urgency for votes to be moved, there is no subtle signaling, there is only trice casting suspicion upon me which quickly developed into "JJJ is the SK".triceratopzeuhl wrote:biggest change in Golden's theories over the course of day 3 was JJJ from Moderate Town & less likely than sloonei to be bad, to worried about JJJ
That leaves us with a question that I think has an obvious answer:
Did trice want to be recruited by me, or did he want to lynch me?
Name them.Epignosis wrote:Trice points the finger at you. The serial killer is supposed to recruit him based on that? No. There are many other creative ways I can think of to get the serial killer to target you than blabbing the way he did.
He could have done it when the thought occurred to him to do it.Epignosis wrote:One is clearly not the case because he could have done it earlier.
It doesn't make sense to discard a hypothetical because of how reality developed. We're talking about how trice might have thought through his decisions in anticipation of circumstance, not how circumstance actually developed. Those aren't the same thing.Epignosis wrote:Two doesn't work because a recruitment didn't happen and Trice knew he was on his way out the door.
He was pissed at me because I'm the SK and didn't find him in the space of three night phases? That's what you believe?Epignosis wrote:Trice was pissed at you.
Or?JaggedJimmyJay wrote:Name them.Epignosis wrote:Trice points the finger at you. The serial killer is supposed to recruit him based on that? No. There are many other creative ways I can think of to get the serial killer to target you than blabbing the way he did.
He was pissed at you because he knew who you are and you were voting for him. So he said fuck you.JaggedJimmyJay wrote:He was pissed at me because I'm the SK and didn't find him in the space of three night phases? That's what you believe?
No. Lynch you because you don't listen to me when I say somebody is good.JaggedJimmyJay wrote:
I'm trying to determine how much thought you're actually putting into this. "Lynch JJJ because trice said so" is the easiest shit there is and you've been very comfortable with that.
Because you're bad.JaggedJimmyJay wrote:I didn't find the reasons you supplied for calling somebody good compelling.
Your voting record is shit.JaggedJimmyJay wrote:Your voting record is shit.
That's actually not true. I'm just more subtle about it.JaggedJimmyJay wrote:You're not receptive to shit.
I hope you get lynched before Christmas.JaggedJimmyJay wrote:I'm offering more than you are Mr. Fuck Christmas.
I'm sorry that I'm unsure about my suspicion about MM. Which is really what this comes down to. I suspect him. I'm not certain he's bad. I suspect that he might be. Which is not enough for me to vote for him when I can't have a conversation with him about that.JaggedJimmyJay wrote:Not a fan. I'm considering a Marmot/LoRab mafia team, because it's too late in the game to be concerned with voting for an insanified player. I'll look into their posts to see if I can substantiate that suspicion more conclusively.LoRab wrote:Put my vote on G-Man for now. I will sort of be on, so I could be convinced to change it, if I am able to see posts and not be paying attention to meeting. Minly because I don't want to vote for MM because I'm too iffy on that. And because I'm finding his posts more suspicious than sig's. And anyone else on this poll, I feel pretty good about. So, ironically, it's kind of process of elimination.
For the children.Epignosis wrote:If, at the end of this game, 3J turns out to be a civilian, I will donate $50 to the charity of his choice.
I'll have to do it in February, but I'll do it.
That's a deal.JaggedJimmyJay wrote:For the children.Epignosis wrote:If, at the end of this game, 3J turns out to be a civilian, I will donate $50 to the charity of his choice.
I'll have to do it in February, but I'll do it.
That's technically possible; I haven't done any other analyses of that type. Throw two names at me of players you think might be baddie teammates and I'll have a look.LoRab wrote:And your analysis between me and MM could be done between any 2 players and show equally inconclusive material
No. He's a suspect but he's not the only one. There's a lot to discuss about everyone alive.LoRab wrote:Are you certain about him?
Something has occurred to me:JaggedJimmyJay wrote:I'll reciprocate, Epi. If I don't turn out to be a civilian, I'll send out $50 to the charity of your choice.
Spoiler: show
I didn't understand what you meant by this post, so I didn't comment. Was it a joke?JaggedJimmyJay wrote:Something has occurred to me:JaggedJimmyJay wrote:I'll reciprocate, Epi. If I don't turn out to be a civilian, I'll send out $50 to the charity of your choice.
Spoiler: show
This post was meant to be in good spirits, but it occurs to me that it might actually influence how people read me in this game. JJJ wouldn't throw his money away like that would he???
That's not my intention, please ignore this post when you judge my alignment. That's not in the spirit of the game and I should have considered that before I hit submit.
It was a light-hearted response to your pledge. I've already seen my rolecard so it's not the same thing; that was my joke.Epignosis wrote:I didn't understand what you meant by this post, so I didn't comment. Was it a joke?
How about do an analysis between yourself and Sig.JaggedJimmyJay wrote:That's technically possible; I haven't done any other analyses of that type. Throw two names at me of players you think might be baddie teammates and I'll have a look.LoRab wrote:And your analysis between me and MM could be done between any 2 players and show equally inconclusive material
No. He's a suspect but he's not the only one. There's a lot to discuss about everyone alive.LoRab wrote:Are you certain about him?
JaggedJimmyJay wrote:You got it LoRab, I'll switch my selection to that one.
lolLoRab wrote:How about do an analysis between yourself and Sig.JaggedJimmyJay wrote:That's technically possible; I haven't done any other analyses of that type. Throw two names at me of players you think might be baddie teammates and I'll have a look.LoRab wrote:And your analysis between me and MM could be done between any 2 players and show equally inconclusive material
No. He's a suspect but he's not the only one. There's a lot to discuss about everyone alive.LoRab wrote:Are you certain about him?
Sorry, I wasn't watching the poll, just trying to discern anything I could from your posts.Epignosis wrote:I voted DrWilgy when I posted about birds (12 days of fuck that holiday), but you posted a smiley that suggested I shouldn't do that, so I went back to G-Man.Metalmarsh89 wrote:I can't believe you lynched him!
I'll be on to address things later.
I haven't said much about LoRab, you're right there. Dom falls in the same boat. Tell me why LoRab could be bad.JaggedJimmyJay wrote:Their earliest interactions are chummy banter, with Marmot offering up the first read (civilian read on LoRab). Eventually LoRab responds in kind, but generally they don't talk much about how they read one another. MM restated a civ read a few times throughout the game. LoRab's read eventually turned south as of Day 6. She hasn't really pursued his lynch though. Day 6 was a mega-wagon on me (she voted MM after my wagon had taken off and it was unlikely to change in that direction) and on Day 7 she wouldn't vote for him due to his cap lock insanification.
One thing I notice in MM's posts is that his read on LoRab went in the civilian direction early on, but he didn't do much to explain that read. His read hasn't changed since then as far as I can tell. He was critical of Golden for defending LoRab based on what he called uninspired reasoning. I don't know what Marmot's own reasoning is for his civ read on LoRab. LoRab has been less kind to MM lately, but it hasn't meant much because of his insanification and her claimed scruples related to that.
This interaction doesn't scream mafia-mafia at me, but I do think it's compatible. They've given each other a pretty wide berth for most of the game. The worst of it is LoRab's recent conduct -- the late Day 6 flier vote that didn't amount to anything, and her unwillingness to vote for him on Day 7.
Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Wed Dec 16, 2020 7:33 pm Just how many days of "let's yeet them tomorrow" can a mafioso survive?
The answer: all of them, if you are a marmot.
What if there is only one mafia left?JaggedJimmyJay wrote:I'm finding it more difficult to come up with these than I anticipated. The only combination that I think looks unlikely at face value is Epignosis/Marmot, because I do think Epi has made a real effort to lynch him. I could narrow it down further by eliminating town reads, but there aren't many of those frankly and it would still leave me with way too many analyses. Meh.Quin wrote:Not off the top of my head. I'll have a more thorough look at it tomorrow when we know where we're standing with living players and night kills.
Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Wed Dec 16, 2020 7:33 pm Just how many days of "let's yeet them tomorrow" can a mafioso survive?
The answer: all of them, if you are a marmot.
Can I haz GTH'S for christmas, doc?DrWilgy wrote:Yo, sorry. I thought I had another day
Would've voted Sig from what I read.
What if there are three?Metalmarsh89 wrote:What if there is only one mafia left?JaggedJimmyJay wrote:I'm finding it more difficult to come up with these than I anticipated. The only combination that I think looks unlikely at face value is Epignosis/Marmot, because I do think Epi has made a real effort to lynch him. I could narrow it down further by eliminating town reads, but there aren't many of those frankly and it would still leave me with way too many analyses. Meh.Quin wrote:Not off the top of my head. I'll have a more thorough look at it tomorrow when we know where we're standing with living players and night kills.
Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Wed Dec 16, 2020 7:33 pm Just how many days of "let's yeet them tomorrow" can a mafioso survive?
The answer: all of them, if you are a marmot.
I think Sleep is the only role that can kill right now regardless of who's alive. It doesn't appear the mafia team can give the kill to anyone they want, it has to be the predetermined role in the order assigned.Quin wrote:When was the last time anybody was silenced? We've all checked in today, right? There could only be one baddie left, since Sleep can't kill and silence at the same time.
The SK dying before casketjack exposes his role, which in this case would make trice a confirmed civilian and a kill magnet. In a game where survival is required to win, that's not conducive to winning.Metalmarsh89 wrote:Wert Trice.
I think he felt the pressure that he was going to be lynched, so he called out the man he knew to be the SK. If we manage to lynch Jay first, trice converts to civilian and maybe gets some breathing room to live on after leading a lynch on the SK.