Oh man, you missed my implosion in Harry Stephen Keeler Mafia where I took 15 votes.Ricochet wrote:20-vote lynch train? Yowza. How many players are in that game? I think Snowman's lynch in Death Note was the biggest I recall. Over 15 or so.

Moderator: Community Team
Oh man, you missed my implosion in Harry Stephen Keeler Mafia where I took 15 votes.Ricochet wrote:20-vote lynch train? Yowza. How many players are in that game? I think Snowman's lynch in Death Note was the biggest I recall. Over 15 or so.
Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Wed Dec 16, 2020 7:33 pm Just how many days of "let's yeet them tomorrow" can a mafioso survive?
The answer: all of them, if you are a marmot.
Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Wed Dec 16, 2020 7:33 pm Just how many days of "let's yeet them tomorrow" can a mafioso survive?
The answer: all of them, if you are a marmot.
49. But I think 3 were already dead when the lynch started.Ricochet wrote:20-vote lynch train? Yowza. How many players are in that game? I think Snowman's lynch in Death Note was the biggest I recall. Over 15 or so.
I know your pain.Scotty wrote:I just had my longest post ever get deleted on my phone. I want to cry. I didn't save it.
It was my magnum opus.
I don't know if I can repeat it. I spent 2 hours typing it out on this PIEXE OF SHIT PHONE DAMMIT.
I had no inside information on either DH or espers but DH was saying things that made firm sense to me. Seeing him in the lead on the poll that close to the end was unconscionable to me and I wasn't about to add a vote to myself to save DH. My vote on espers was all about protecting a player I thought was good. I took a stand but it wasn't enough.Scotty wrote:Note thAt this is the last read GMan has on espers before voting him, even though he had like 5 other people on his radar for more suspicious reasons. But he votes espers not because espers is bad but because he wanted to "save DH". Like 4 more people voted after GMAn in that last 10 min, so it wouldn't be a stretch to assume that he assumed there would be more votes thrown in other directions. DH had a healthy amount of suspicion, after all. And by tieing the vote at 2-2 it at least have him cred in case espers flipped bad.
Where as LoRab essentially votes espers out in Day 4, where she could have tied it, GMAn just tied it on a person he had a neutral read on anyway. Weird voting but again looks good for him if espers does get voted out and flips. Espers was leaving after the vote anyway, so what better time to appear civ
Scotty wrote:GMan votes LoRab. LoRab had some healthy suspicion at this point, but note that GMan did not just vote to save someone like he said day 3. Crap I'm out of time.
Off the top of my head, probably you, LoRab or DDL. Maybe MM, too. I still don't know what to think of him.MovingPictures07 wrote:Before I leave, I have a random question for everyone:
Let's say that Epi decided you won some contest and gave you one role check to be used tonight. Which player would you use it on and why?
The reason I ask this question is in realizing that we can only afford 2 more mislynches (3 and we lose) going forward. So I want players to actively think about not only which players seem most likely to be mafia, but also which players would be more unpredictable or dangerous to have around in LyLo.
(for those who are unaware of the terminology, LyLo = Lynch and Lose, and it indicates the lynch/Day period in which, if the civilians mislynch one of their own, they lose the game)
I think this is worth discussing.
Be back later.
Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Wed Dec 16, 2020 7:33 pm Just how many days of "let's yeet them tomorrow" can a mafioso survive?
The answer: all of them, if you are a marmot.
You're a friend of Sloonei's? I don't recall seeing you in a RYM game.Cookie wrote:Hi guys, I'm here! I just woke up and funnily enough I was stupidly drunk last night and came onto mafia to show my cool friends and they thought I was weird LOL! I told them it was a cool game. They said it sounded dumb. I get a message from my friend this morning and they asked if they could join HAHA. I will introduce them to some newbie game at the other site I play on.
Anyway, I have about 8 pages to catch up on but I see Elo was lynched so I will keep that in mind while I am reading up. Also, I am going to try to post my top 2 suspects and reason why. It might take me a while so bare with me (I have to clean and go to a massage today so I am hoping to be done reading/responding within the next 2 hours...).
Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Wed Dec 16, 2020 7:33 pm Just how many days of "let's yeet them tomorrow" can a mafioso survive?
The answer: all of them, if you are a marmot.
You should take the chance to play mafia in RL with them. It's awesome.Cookie wrote:Hi guys, I'm here! I just woke up and funnily enough I was stupidly drunk last night and came onto mafia to show my cool friends and they thought I was weird LOL! I told them it was a cool game. They said it sounded dumb. I get a message from my friend this morning and they asked if they could join HAHA. I will introduce them to some newbie game at the other site I play on.
Anyway, I have about 8 pages to catch up on but I see Elo was lynched so I will keep that in mind while I am reading up. Also, I am going to try to post my top 2 suspects and reason why. It might take me a while so bare with me (I have to clean and go to a massage today so I am hoping to be done reading/responding within the next 2 hours...).
The only thing I am guilty of is avoiding being part of a majority vote so I can avoid the wrath of Rorschach. Half of the remaining living players are now on Rorschach's hit list though I wonder if he's still around. Unless he was blocked, I was expecting to see him kill someone Night 4. He could have been merciful but does that mean he can win with that player or will he need to circle back around and kill them later?MovingPictures07 wrote:I could definitely see G-Man as Big Figure.
I'm glad you pointed out those who have not voted for a confirmed mafia because I agree that I'll be absolutely FLOORED if you, Bass, or Rico are bad.
I also agree that if mafia kills you tonight, Big Figure is a fucking pussy.
I hate mafia teams in recent games I've played. They always take the easy way out. Actually earn your win, don't chicken out by killing off someone you know you can't lynch. That's pussy play.
Llama may have been Rorschach. That explains his early attempt at baddie hunting, and the resulting success.G-Man wrote:The only thing I am guilty of is avoiding being part of a majority vote so I can avoid the wrath of Rorschach. Half of the remaining living players are now on Rorschach's hit list though I wonder if he's still around. Unless he was blocked, I was expecting to see him kill someone Night 4. He could have been merciful but does that mean he can win with that player or will he need to circle back around and kill them later?MovingPictures07 wrote:I could definitely see G-Man as Big Figure.
I'm glad you pointed out those who have not voted for a confirmed mafia because I agree that I'll be absolutely FLOORED if you, Bass, or Rico are bad.
I also agree that if mafia kills you tonight, Big Figure is a fucking pussy.
I hate mafia teams in recent games I've played. They always take the easy way out. Actually earn your win, don't chicken out by killing off someone you know you can't lynch. That's pussy play.
As for your comments on the mafia, this game is all about opportunism. Sure, we can call it cowardly or any other adjective we like but the fact is that baddies always have to be rat finks and carefully eliminate their threats. Otherwise, what's the point of playing? Be careful making bold statements like that because you'll make a hypocrite of yourself the next time you're a baddie.
Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Wed Dec 16, 2020 7:33 pm Just how many days of "let's yeet them tomorrow" can a mafioso survive?
The answer: all of them, if you are a marmot.
Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Wed Dec 16, 2020 7:33 pm Just how many days of "let's yeet them tomorrow" can a mafioso survive?
The answer: all of them, if you are a marmot.
Keeping this in mind, I think LoRab is less suspicious than I previously thought. I mean, I think everyone is suspicious.Scotty wrote:Also LoRab made the vote that sunk Michael.
Keep that in mind...
That's a good point. I think many people suspected Espers though, so if the tie caused me to be lynched instead, Espers would have been voted out the next night (likely) and then LoRab would have been suspicious.Dragon D. Luffy wrote:Could LoRab have saved him, though? The only thing she could have done would be to vote Cookie, and then pray to the RNG gods, which upon a possible ika lynch would have placed a MAFIA sign above her head.Scotty wrote:Also LoRab made the vote that sunk Michael.
Keep that in mind...
Otherwise she could be Moloch.
Or MP could be Moloch, and he is trying to stay out of trouble while he does... whatever Moloch needs to do.
Damn this Moloch roles makes it so confusing.
Have you only been hunting for Big Figure this entire time? I can understand we get out the Inmates based on voting/posting patterns, but how are we going to figure out who is Moloch?Dragon D. Luffy wrote:I swear, after we catch Big Figure this game is gonna get insane. I think I'll have to rework all of my reads.
I voted Espers/ika because, as I said earlier in the game, I found Espers to be suspicious because of his last minute vote on Sloonei and subsequent lack of voting later on which gave us no information about his voting patterns.Dragon D. Luffy wrote:Actually, considering the timing for the ika voting, I think Russ, Eloh, juliets and Cookie all look good here. Or at least, "not Big Figure". Could all still be Moloch.
You could argue Cookie was saving herself, but she could have saved herself by voting LoRaB. She didn't. Neither did ika, who voted Cookie.
Of course, that's assuming they would never throw each other under the bus at this situation. Though there is this:
WIFOM pls? Why did he even bother to say this? No idea.ika wrote:if im baddie, i tell my teammated how i play as baddie and what they need to do. i can try my darnest for them but i always give them the abloslute of bus me to hell. i gve adive to them and tell them who they need to stratiticly kill and set up long term plans and plans to back that if it fails. in short: i do but i suck at it and are a better planner
ika was in a really bad shape at this point so a sacrifice of him, although terrible in the long run, could spell good for his partner in the long run.
So the bottomline is, the meaning of this poll depends on how willing you think Big Figure was to sacrifice his teamate.
Eloh looks particulary unlikely to be Big Figure, though, since she sacrificed both of her teamates. Could still be Moloch. Serial Killer Eloh all over again?
But you also have DDL in the orange/red of your RL. Why? (If you've already answered this or have changed your mind, disregard this because I'm still catching up. I'm on page 37.MovingPictures07 wrote:Metalmarsh, I'm pretty sure we're seeing civilian DDL. If not, Moloch at worst.
I'd bet my mafia reputation that it's Elo.
Even if we lynch both Big Figure and Moloch, I would think it would then come down to civs vs. Rorschach. Could the civs win if they outnumber him? I guess it's possible but that would be like telling Rorschach he doesn't have the right to earn his win.Ricochet wrote:Well Rorschach's list now consists of:
DDL (Golden, DH, Eloh)
Cookie (Golden, DH)
LoRab (Golden)
Scotty (Eloh)
MP (Eloh)
That's half of the remaining players at this point. He has to track on odd N AND kill on even N, which means he can only use it roughly two more times, at best, in this game. Of course, it would suck for any of his victims to turn out a civ (needing to have stayed alive, that is), but overall I'd say Rorschach is way over his head right now, rather than a ferocious shadow predator. Him not killing on N4 means for me he was either blocked or already dead.
Are you planning to keep refraining from voting on the majority train, no matter what, G-Man?
Maybe it's the detail-oriented host in me but I can't see Llama as Rorschach because Rorschach's journal was used to announce the Day 2 lynch and Night 2 NK. Llama died Night 1. I guess it's possible that Epi just has a variety of posting methods built around the game's theme but I am a Chekhov's Gun kind of guy. I think that those posts imply that Rorschach was still alive at that point.Metalmarsh89 wrote:Llama may have been Rorschach. That explains his early attempt at baddie hunting, and the resulting success.G-Man wrote:The only thing I am guilty of is avoiding being part of a majority vote so I can avoid the wrath of Rorschach. Half of the remaining living players are now on Rorschach's hit list though I wonder if he's still around. Unless he was blocked, I was expecting to see him kill someone Night 4. He could have been merciful but does that mean he can win with that player or will he need to circle back around and kill them later?MovingPictures07 wrote:I could definitely see G-Man as Big Figure.
I'm glad you pointed out those who have not voted for a confirmed mafia because I agree that I'll be absolutely FLOORED if you, Bass, or Rico are bad.
I also agree that if mafia kills you tonight, Big Figure is a fucking pussy.
I hate mafia teams in recent games I've played. They always take the easy way out. Actually earn your win, don't chicken out by killing off someone you know you can't lynch. That's pussy play.
As for your comments on the mafia, this game is all about opportunism. Sure, we can call it cowardly or any other adjective we like but the fact is that baddies always have to be rat finks and carefully eliminate their threats. Otherwise, what's the point of playing? Be careful making bold statements like that because you'll make a hypocrite of yourself the next time you're a baddie.
I had forgotten about that. Hopefully he's still plugging away at it.Metalmarsh89 wrote:Don't forget that Dr. Malcom Long can remove players from Rorschach's death list as well.
Yes, I love Sloonei. We played at a different site but he doesn't play anymore. He introduced it but he's too good for us so we kicked him out.Metalmarsh89 wrote:You're a friend of Sloonei's? I don't recall seeing you in a RYM game.Cookie wrote:Hi guys, I'm here! I just woke up and funnily enough I was stupidly drunk last night and came onto mafia to show my cool friends and they thought I was weird LOL! I told them it was a cool game. They said it sounded dumb. I get a message from my friend this morning and they asked if they could join HAHA. I will introduce them to some newbie game at the other site I play on.
Anyway, I have about 8 pages to catch up on but I see Elo was lynched so I will keep that in mind while I am reading up. Also, I am going to try to post my top 2 suspects and reason why. It might take me a while so bare with me (I have to clean and go to a massage today so I am hoping to be done reading/responding within the next 2 hours...).
We don't need to go against Rorschach.G-Man wrote:Even if we lynch both Big Figure and Moloch, I would think it would then come down to civs vs. Rorschach. Could the civs win if they outnumber him? I guess it's possible but that would be like telling Rorschach he doesn't have the right to earn his win.Ricochet wrote:Well Rorschach's list now consists of:
DDL (Golden, DH, Eloh)
Cookie (Golden, DH)
LoRab (Golden)
Scotty (Eloh)
MP (Eloh)
That's half of the remaining players at this point. He has to track on odd N AND kill on even N, which means he can only use it roughly two more times, at best, in this game. Of course, it would suck for any of his victims to turn out a civ (needing to have stayed alive, that is), but overall I'd say Rorschach is way over his head right now, rather than a ferocious shadow predator. Him not killing on N4 means for me he was either blocked or already dead.
Are you planning to keep refraining from voting on the majority train, no matter what, G-Man?
I've responded in pink!MovingPictures07 wrote:G-Man, thanks for those technicolors. I know I knocked them last Day period, and I still firmly believe they shouldn't be the only source of information, but they are an important one.
Cookie, you still wondering why the mafia has kept me alive this whole time? Should be evident now.
Not so much anymore. You are likely to be lynched. But given your posts, you still seem like you could be bad but I don't think you will be receiving my vote tomorrow.
Everyone, if you want to lynch me tomorrow, so be it. Going into this Day period, it seemed likely to me that I very well could get lynched anyway, and people were complaining that I couldn't commit. I felt strong about what I uncovered shortly after D5's start about Elo, so I decided to take a stand. Otherwise, it seemed as though I might have been dead meat anyway.
If you want to blame her death on me, that's fine. I realize she couldn't even defend herself. I take full responsibility for that lynch, as I stated earlier. I hate that I caused another mislynch and led to an unproductive D5 and likely an unproductive D6. I'm going to try my best to avoid the latter.In your defense, you did not realize she may have been silenced until after your vote and after you posted evidence against her.
Rico said it best earlier in D5 when he said that the lynch of Elo truly was a test of voting records v. gameplay, because Elo looked pretty good in the former (though not perfect) and terrible in the latter. I took a gamble and I was wrong. For derailing the thread and refusing to listen to counterarguments as much as I should have, I apologize.
Nonetheless, I think that any of you who want to go "BLAME MP" should take a step back and realize that every player here takes an inherent responsibility for their own vote when it is cast (or not cast, which is reprehensible).
I don't apologize for all of the baddie hunting I've done this game. I may have questioned myself too much on Sloonei and espers, and tunneled Elo, but I've done everything in my power to hunt baddies this game. Truly this is a terrible performance from me. But it doesn't make me mafia.
I realize for some (perhaps many) of you, it would take a flip of me to truly confirm that, and nothing I can say would persuade you otherwise. I can empathize.
I was actually feeling selfish earlier this morning, as if I didn't care whether town won this game if they auto-lynched me tomorrow, because it means that I won't win. I put an insane amount of time and energy into this game, and it's been very mentally and emotionally taxing. I think if you are lynched tomorrow, it will not be because you lead the vote on Elo and you turned out to be town. It will be because people have studied your posts and votes and determined you to be the most likely candidate for being bad. If we lynched everyone who led lynches against civs, then we would lose. For G-Man to declare to me that I "need to go" was very bothersome, especially when it can be argued that other players "need to go", for whatever reason. I don't think that should EVER be a reason for lynching anyone. Especially for lynching someone who's put as much effort as I have into this game. If you find my actions suspect, sure. But no one, on sheer principle, "needs to go". This isn't a criticism of you, G-Man, and I don't think that's what you intended, since you have declared my voting record as a reason for me being suspect, but I just want this said nonetheless.
Despite that, the truth is that I still want to see civilians win this game regardless. I'm going to try my best in what will probably be my last hour to make that happen.
I don't want to be lynched tomorrow. Right now, there are 10 players alive. Assuming Moloch is alive and a civilian is NKed tonight, that leaves 7-1-1 going into D6. 6-1-1 if I get lynched, then 5-1-1 going into D7. That's still not bad, but less than ideal, since you all can only afford 1 more mislynch after you'd lynch me. 2 mislynches, assuming successful NK of a civilian each Night, would make it 1-1-1, which is GAME OVER for us. Then there's the complication of the Watchmen additional win cons as well.
Think carefully about how you conduct lynches going forward, including my own, since we're running low on chances.
I worked at a summer camp last year and the kids played mafia. Except they cheated because they peeked to see who the mafia were. Every. Time.Dragon D. Luffy wrote:You should take the chance to play mafia in RL with them. It's awesome.Cookie wrote:Hi guys, I'm here! I just woke up and funnily enough I was stupidly drunk last night and came onto mafia to show my cool friends and they thought I was weird LOL! I told them it was a cool game. They said it sounded dumb. I get a message from my friend this morning and they asked if they could join HAHA. I will introduce them to some newbie game at the other site I play on.
Anyway, I have about 8 pages to catch up on but I see Elo was lynched so I will keep that in mind while I am reading up. Also, I am going to try to post my top 2 suspects and reason why. It might take me a while so bare with me (I have to clean and go to a massage today so I am hoping to be done reading/responding within the next 2 hours...).
I actually wish I was mafia right now, G-Man; if I was, I'd be more proud of my gameplay.G-Man wrote: Personally, I think we should revisit this gem because part of me wants very much to believe that MP07 is trying to pull the biggest swindle I've ever seen.
TIN FOIL READ ON MOVINGPICTURES07:
D1: 11th vote overall, 2nd vote for Scotty. Talks up suspicions of his teammate early and then slowly backs it down with detailed posts on why Sloonei isn't so suspicious after all. It's subtle defense hidden behind personal observations and reasoning. In theory, he shouldn't get called out on back-tracking on Sloonei because he provided oh so much evidence to support his waning suspicions. He then latches onto Bass's suspicions of Scotty and posts a very detailed theory on why Scotty must be bad. See that? He subtly defended Slooeni while trying to stir the pot on Scotty- both times using his big-talker meta as a shield for his wicked intentions. His vote for Scotty has it 2-2 between Niju and Scotty and just one vote behind his teammate. All he needs is one or two followers to take the bait and get then he can castigate them for their votes after the fact. Too bad no one bit. Possibly silenced himself because that's what baddies do when they think they can get away with it.
D2: Misses the vote. He was silenced and couldn't vote but he wastes his silencing because he's not even on the poll so it doesn't build any sympathy for him whatsoever. Maybe he even encouraged espers to skip the vote because- hey, no Inmates on the poll so why even stick our necks out with a vote?
D3: Keeps his teammate in his top tier of suspects and waits until almost the last minute to vote. Why? To see if espers needs his help. He knows he can't vote DH without getting called on it so he votes sideways for one of his other suspects, using Cookie's rough game against her. He tries to pump up the "Cookie is bad!" wavelength something fierce but no one bites. He gets lucky because espers survived the lynch poll tie. Now he needs someone new to rail against alongside Cookie and decides now is the time to use Elo's odd play this game against her.
D4: 9th vote overall, 3rd vote on Cookie. His vote brings Cookie within 1 vote of tying espers/ika. Despite a lot of agreement that espers/ika is bad new, he caves and falls back on Cookie a second day in a row. It's designed to look consistent though because she doesn't look so great and was in MP07's suspect list already. After the flip, he goes hard at pushing his Elo case. He silences her Night 4 and stirs the pot early by voting for her amidst his verbosity. It attracts a second vote before anyone's realized that Elo has been possibly silenced.
Agreed 100%.Ricochet wrote:Off the top of my head, probably you, LoRab or DDL. Maybe MM, too. I still don't know what to think of him.MovingPictures07 wrote:Before I leave, I have a random question for everyone:
Let's say that Epi decided you won some contest and gave you one role check to be used tonight. Which player would you use it on and why?
The reason I ask this question is in realizing that we can only afford 2 more mislynches (3 and we lose) going forward. So I want players to actively think about not only which players seem most likely to be mafia, but also which players would be more unpredictable or dangerous to have around in LyLo.
(for those who are unaware of the terminology, LyLo = Lynch and Lose, and it indicates the lynch/Day period in which, if the civilians mislynch one of their own, they lose the game)
I think this is worth discussing.
Be back later.
But I imagine myself dying of a heart attack if I'd end up in a lylo, because of the tension. We definitely need to do better with lynches from now on. I'd call to focus on Moloch as well, not just say "we'll save him for last after we nail Big Figure". Missing either of them would be extremely detrimental from now on.
We're clearly on different pages.Metalmarsh89 wrote:This game doesn't have to be won in LYLO everyone. Ignore MP for a second and look at your own reads. Why not lynch the player you find most suspicious as soon as possible?
But seriously, ignore MP for second. I know he is a fan of vomitting all over the thread and taking center stage (no offense intended Sockman). But he was completely wrong about Elohcin, and I disagree with his tactic of "lynching unpredictable or dangerous players" because that in now way incriminates them, and for a baddie who has played a solid game to this point, that is a free pass to LYLO. If you suspect me for being mafia, so be it, but I expect a real case out of it.
I am just messing with whoever the last baddie is. :PG-Man wrote:The only thing I am guilty of is avoiding being part of a majority vote so I can avoid the wrath of Rorschach. Half of the remaining living players are now on Rorschach's hit list though I wonder if he's still around. Unless he was blocked, I was expecting to see him kill someone Night 4. He could have been merciful but does that mean he can win with that player or will he need to circle back around and kill them later?MovingPictures07 wrote:I could definitely see G-Man as Big Figure.
I'm glad you pointed out those who have not voted for a confirmed mafia because I agree that I'll be absolutely FLOORED if you, Bass, or Rico are bad.
I also agree that if mafia kills you tonight, Big Figure is a fucking pussy.
I hate mafia teams in recent games I've played. They always take the easy way out. Actually earn your win, don't chicken out by killing off someone you know you can't lynch. That's pussy play.
As for your comments on the mafia, this game is all about opportunism. Sure, we can call it cowardly or any other adjective we like but the fact is that baddies always have to be rat finks and carefully eliminate their threats. Otherwise, what's the point of playing? Be careful making bold statements like that because you'll make a hypocrite of yourself the next time you're a baddie.
You may not have been but someone else mentioned my name. I can't remember off the top of my head who did though.MovingPictures07 wrote:We're clearly on different pages.Metalmarsh89 wrote:This game doesn't have to be won in LYLO everyone. Ignore MP for a second and look at your own reads. Why not lynch the player you find most suspicious as soon as possible?
But seriously, ignore MP for second. I know he is a fan of vomitting all over the thread and taking center stage (no offense intended Sockman). But he was completely wrong about Elohcin, and I disagree with his tactic of "lynching unpredictable or dangerous players" because that in now way incriminates them, and for a baddie who has played a solid game to this point, that is a free pass to LYLO. If you suspect me for being mafia, so be it, but I expect a real case out of it.
- I never said the game has to be won in LyLo. I thought we were going to win it during D5 (excluding Moloch). We still could during D6. I'd like to.
- Where did I say we shouldn't lynch the player/vote that everyone most finds suspicious?
- I never said we should lynch unpredictable or dangerous players, I specifically set up the context in a role check to have a discussion.
- Why did you preemptively defend yourself? I wasn't even really thinking of you when I asked, since at least you vote. I'm afraid of a LyLo where one of the civilians misses the vote.
Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Wed Dec 16, 2020 7:33 pm Just how many days of "let's yeet them tomorrow" can a mafioso survive?
The answer: all of them, if you are a marmot.
Also, G-Man, I have no intention of clogging up the thread more than I have to, but I'm still curious:G-Man wrote:And yet, despite the "entire thread" calling espers/ike suspicious, you flinch and vote for someone else for the SECOND DAY IN A ROW!MovingPictures07 wrote:Then, regarding her espers vote on D4, she only cast it after espers's behavior was being called suspicious by the entire thread. I can pull quotes again if you want. Anyway, her vote for espers was actually the LEAST risky move that a teammate could make at that point. It would be much more risky throwing off (like G-Man did onto MM) or casting a vote on LoRab or Cookie, since she could have tied it up, saved espers again, and then once espers eventually flipped, she would have been seen as saving a teammate.
The way she cast the espers / ika vote on D4 was actually brilliant, since it's exactly the move that is currently securing her in everyone's minds right now as NOT an Inmate, but remember that espers had the most votes, tied with DH, on Day 3.
What would have been TRULY risky for her to do would have been to cast that 3rd vote for espers on D3 and sealed his fate then. If she had done that, there's no way I'd be proclaiming her as bad right now, and I'd be in total agreement with you, DDL.
But she didn't do that.![]()
You're angry, you're desperate, and you're flailing. You may not be either the inmate or Moloch but frankly, you're not helping and need to be eliminated from this game. I am very strongly leaning towards voting out you and your outbursts. Something feels off about you and has almost all game. I want to believe that it's just the PhD work.
Yes, I did mention you.Metalmarsh89 wrote:You may not have been but someone else mentioned my name. I can't remember off the top of my head who did though.MovingPictures07 wrote:We're clearly on different pages.Metalmarsh89 wrote:This game doesn't have to be won in LYLO everyone. Ignore MP for a second and look at your own reads. Why not lynch the player you find most suspicious as soon as possible?
But seriously, ignore MP for second. I know he is a fan of vomitting all over the thread and taking center stage (no offense intended Sockman). But he was completely wrong about Elohcin, and I disagree with his tactic of "lynching unpredictable or dangerous players" because that in now way incriminates them, and for a baddie who has played a solid game to this point, that is a free pass to LYLO. If you suspect me for being mafia, so be it, but I expect a real case out of it.
- I never said the game has to be won in LyLo. I thought we were going to win it during D5 (excluding Moloch). We still could during D6. I'd like to.
- Where did I say we shouldn't lynch the player/vote that everyone most finds suspicious?
- I never said we should lynch unpredictable or dangerous players, I specifically set up the context in a role check to have a discussion.
- Why did you preemptively defend yourself? I wasn't even really thinking of you when I asked, since at least you vote. I'm afraid of a LyLo where one of the civilians misses the vote.
Yes, I suppose I'm influenced to correlate a bit my suspicions with the players I'd be anxious to proceed into a lylo with, because of their mixed bag of gameplay. But, as I've said, the lylo scenario sounds like a dire one to me, considering how much happened already in this game, and I can't say I'll feel comfortable being in lylo with a lot of other players, either (because my paranoia and fear that the civvies in my view have been the most deceitful the whole time will probably kick in). But it's hard for me to tell what'll happen and how things we'll evolve until then.MovingPictures07 wrote:Agreed 100%.Ricochet wrote:Off the top of my head, probably you, LoRab or DDL. Maybe MM, too. I still don't know what to think of him.MovingPictures07 wrote:Before I leave, I have a random question for everyone:
Let's say that Epi decided you won some contest and gave you one role check to be used tonight. Which player would you use it on and why?
The reason I ask this question is in realizing that we can only afford 2 more mislynches (3 and we lose) going forward. So I want players to actively think about not only which players seem most likely to be mafia, but also which players would be more unpredictable or dangerous to have around in LyLo.
(for those who are unaware of the terminology, LyLo = Lynch and Lose, and it indicates the lynch/Day period in which, if the civilians mislynch one of their own, they lose the game)
I think this is worth discussing.
Be back later.
But I imagine myself dying of a heart attack if I'd end up in a lylo, because of the tension. We definitely need to do better with lynches from now on. I'd call to focus on Moloch as well, not just say "we'll save him for last after we nail Big Figure". Missing either of them would be extremely detrimental from now on.
What do you think of the other players at the moment? Did you pick me, LoRab, and DDL because they have the highest propensities to receive your votes going into D6 or because they have the most potential to make or break the win?
Huh, weird. Well, they are all completely genuine, so I'm not sure where the disconnect is happening.G-Man wrote:Dragon mentioned something similar at one point. There's just something about your posting that doesn't feel authentic this game. It's like you're playing to your meta. You're posting the right amount of content for civ MP07 but when I read your posts, they don't feel genuine. Case in point, your cases on Scotty and Elo were easy for me to tear apart in my mind. I don't know that I've seen that from you yet in a game. Hard to say if it is external factors affecting your game or if I've sniffed you out.
Also, you say my cases on Scotty and Elo were easy to tear apart. Does that mean you find my cases to not be genuine because you couldn't possibly understand how I was perceiving their behavior in that way?MovingPictures07 wrote:Huh, weird. Well, they are all completely genuine, so I'm not sure where the disconnect is happening.G-Man wrote:Dragon mentioned something similar at one point. There's just something about your posting that doesn't feel authentic this game. It's like you're playing to your meta. You're posting the right amount of content for civ MP07 but when I read your posts, they don't feel genuine. Case in point, your cases on Scotty and Elo were easy for me to tear apart in my mind. I don't know that I've seen that from you yet in a game. Hard to say if it is external factors affecting your game or if I've sniffed you out.
I would be lying though if I said I don't have a ton that's going on in my life right now. Most of it is of a pleasant nature, of course, but this summer PhD-wise has been very draining. I've consistently been having to fight off burn out. The only reason I've even been playing mafia is to keep myself sane by having at least some social interaction (other than with Annie, of course, which already helps me significantly), as well as something recreational. I haven't been able to make time for much of anything else recreational.
So I'm bad because I was right about Elo, despite it being mathematically impossible I knew her alignment for a fact? Good sleuthing. *slow claps*Scotty wrote:![]()
I feel awful.
Gotta admit that I was sucked into MP's argument a bit there and went down the rabbit hole.
I'm now 0/3. (Well, I still don't know if Cookie is good, but still)
My list still stands. #2 LoRab, but I think my #3 Russ is sneaking up again..
Obvious? That's an overstatement. You've been defending her all game sure, which, to be frank, mafia could be doing just as well as civ. If you were mafia, of course it would be obvious.Russtifinko wrote:MovingPictures07 wrote:
Well, I don't know how that happened. I'm an idiot!
Guess I suck at baddie hunting regardless of my methods.
Hate to say I told you so, but I fucking told you so about 15 damn times. Tunnel much?
And yes Scotty, I'd have gladly gotten in on that action. Bets 4 days.
i am very bad at mafia, and also drunk, and that was sooooo obvious
Her voting patterns indicate that she had some idea, but I'm still confident mafia was bussing espers Day 4. I am discounting Cookie right now since she's been away and I just don't think she had the mastermind behind it (Yes, I know Sloonei and espers are helping Big Figure from the grave).
That leaves my #2 LoRab, and #3 Russ.
Those should be lynched next, in that order.
MovingPictures07 wrote:I could definitely see G-Man as Big Figure.
I'm glad you pointed out those who have not voted for a confirmed mafia because I agree that I'll be absolutely FLOORED if you, Bass, or Rico are bad.
I also agree that if mafia kills you tonight, Big Figure is a fucking pussy.
I hate mafia teams in recent games I've played. They always take the easy way out. Actually earn your win, don't chicken out by killing off someone you know you can't lynch. That's pussy play.
86? That seems oddly specific. Lol.Russtifinko wrote:MovingPictures07 wrote:I could definitely see G-Man as Big Figure.
I'm glad you pointed out those who have not voted for a confirmed mafia because I agree that I'll be absolutely FLOORED if you, Bass, or Rico are bad.
I also agree that if mafia kills you tonight, Big Figure is a fucking pussy.
I hate mafia teams in recent games I've played. They always take the easy way out. Actually earn your win, don't chicken out by killing off someone you know you can't lynch. That's pussy play.
G-Man, again, seems a little too easy. I'm less sure than on the Elo thing on him, but for God's sake keep your eyes open this time. You denied tunneling about 86 times and still tunneled yesterday.
And can we please not call people pussies? I'm not the last mafia, and I still find it kind of rude. Also killing unlynchable people is the only way a baddie can possibly win. So they literally don't have a choice but to be a pussy by your definition.
Again, G-Man being G-Man. And I have explained what I think, over and over. I'd have been glad to talk non-Elo people whenever, but you insisted on making the last lynch binary, so the only productive thing to do was defend Elo.MovingPictures07 wrote:Why does G-man seem too easy?
And, in my defense, all you or anyone could tell me in Elo's defense yesterday was "seems like Elo being Elo" and "her votes are too good".
Not only was the latter false, but you'll have to excuse me if that didn't convince me otherwise.
That said, finger pointing is the last thing we need right now. I accept full responsibility for what happened yesterday, so I think your posts would be better served by explaining why you think what you do, instead of telling me to keep my eyes open, no offense intended.