Battlestar Galactica Mafia - GAME OVER

[a2thezebra]

So Say We All!

Vote sig

[a2thezebra]

I don't need sixty hours to decide who to vote for, let's please lynch sig today for the sake of town. Also stop asking people to mass claim Cylon!

[a2thezebra]

Also I'm town so don't lynch me! I'm not bad.

[Long Con]

So say we all -

what about a Wigly lynch?

I could do this, he is in my top 3. I think IAWY was bad, the only person who really knows him said he was bad, and Wilgy has not come in here and made me feel any better about him.

I think LC is a risk to the town in general, but if we collectively believe we have a lynchable cylon, I am OK with that too. This way when Cain starts killing people or whatever anti town thing it is that his role does besides imposing black & white rules on a grey situation, I can get to say "I told you so" which I enjoy immensely whenever it happens.

If Cain has any other effects on the game, especially starting to kill, then even I will be forced to re-evaluate my stance on her. Like I said, for a player like me, Cain has not changed a thing about my game or goals. We haven't seen any sort of the dire effects you are prognosticating, so I'm glad that it seems like you aren't putting the cart before the horse anymore.

[a2thezebra]

Long Con, JaggedJimmyJay, and to an extent Ricochet, are all confirmed town along with at least a dozen other players.

[a2thezebra]

Epi is pro-town but most likely misguided in his questioning of Polo.

[Long Con]

I don't need sixty hours to decide who to vote for, let's please lynch sig today for the sake of town. Also stop asking people to mass claim Cylon!

Who would you want to put in second place - how likely do you think it is that sig will Cylon-claim if he has the vote majority? Your vote is somewhat rushed, surely you can see the importance of working together and planning together so as to avoid the Amnesty Act deciding this lynch in a Nerolunar kind of way.

Speaking of which, I'll just note that if Metalmarsh had not voted for Nerolunar on Day 2, and had instead voted for Lorab, all the results would be exactly the same at this point. We just wouldn't have had to get upset with MM.

[Long Con]

Long Con, JaggedJimmyJay, and to an extent Ricochet, are all confirmed town along with at least a dozen other players.

"How do you know that?" he asked, knowing that zebra will intentionally refrain from clarifying a damn thing.

[Epignosis]

Then swap "necessary" with "vital". Is that good enough for you?

No. It isn't. I think you are too busy nitpicking over who claimed what instead of figuring out who needs to be lynched. I think your enthusiasm is counterfeit, and I want to know why zebra was swift to protect you from my questioning.

Because your questioning was counterproductive.

I don't agree with you.

[S~V~S]

So say we all -

what about a Wigly lynch?

I could do this, he is in my top 3. I think IAWY was bad, the only person who really knows him said he was bad, and Wilgy has not come in here and made me feel any better about him.

I think LC is a risk to the town in general, but if we collectively believe we have a lynchable cylon, I am OK with that too. This way when Cain starts killing people or whatever anti town thing it is that his role does besides imposing black & white rules on a grey situation, I can get to say "I told you so" which I enjoy immensely whenever it happens.

If Cain has any other effects on the game, especially starting to kill, then even I will be forced to re-evaluate my stance on her. Like I said, for a player like me, Cain has not changed a thing about my game or goals. We haven't seen any sort of the dire effects you are prognosticating, so I'm glad that it seems like you aren't putting the cart before the horse anymore.

I hate that Cain put black & white conditions on a grey situation. I don't like being imposed upon, tbh. At least one person who was town, and possibly more, now has no reason to play as town, and I am not sure why I seem to be the only one to find this disturbing

I said during the night that if the win con change was nullified or mitigated somehow, I would be happy to back off. Instead the Prez gave us a fluff law, which tells me that the Prez can't do that.

You said to give you time. I am willing to do so. But I myself do not think Cain is on the side of the town, I don't see how she possibly could be. She is pro human, yes, but will not hesitate to toss humans to the side if they get in her way. But if Cain proves to be benign, I am content to wait and watch.

What are your thoughts on Wilgy?

Long Con, JaggedJimmyJay, and to an extent Ricochet, are all confirmed town along with at least a dozen other players.

"How do you know that?" he asked, knowing that zebra will intentionally refrain from clarifying a damn thing.

This ^^

[Marmot]

I don't need sixty hours to decide who to vote for, let's please lynch sig today for the sake of town. Also stop asking people to mass claim Cylon!

Who would you want to put in second place - how likely do you think it is that sig will Cylon-claim if he has the vote majority? Your vote is somewhat rushed, surely you can see the importance of working together and planning together so as to avoid the Amnesty Act deciding this lynch in a Nerolunar kind of way.

Speaking of which, I'll just note that if Metalmarsh had not voted for Nerolunar on Day 2, and had instead voted for Lorab, all the results would be exactly the same at this point. We just wouldn't have had to get upset with MM.

But that development wouldn't have been nearly as fun for everyone involved.

[Long Con]

So say we all -

what about a Wigly lynch?

I could do this, he is in my top 3. I think IAWY was bad, the only person who really knows him said he was bad, and Wilgy has not come in here and made me feel any better about him.

I think LC is a risk to the town in general, but if we collectively believe we have a lynchable cylon, I am OK with that too. This way when Cain starts killing people or whatever anti town thing it is that his role does besides imposing black & white rules on a grey situation, I can get to say "I told you so" which I enjoy immensely whenever it happens.

If Cain has any other effects on the game, especially starting to kill, then even I will be forced to re-evaluate my stance on her. Like I said, for a player like me, Cain has not changed a thing about my game or goals. We haven't seen any sort of the dire effects you are prognosticating, so I'm glad that it seems like you aren't putting the cart before the horse anymore.

I hate that Cain put black & white conditions on a grey situation. I don't like being imposed upon, tbh. At least one person who was town, and possibly more, now has no reason to play as town, and I am not sure why I seem to be the only one to find this disturbing

The situation right now is not the same as it was three days ago. Three days from now, I think it is highly likely that the situation will also be not the same as right now. Players like Epignosis need to focus on the endgame, not only the present.

I said during the night that if the win con change was nullified or mitigated somehow, I would be happy to back off. Instead the Prez gave us a fluff law, which tells me that the Prez can't do that.

Possibly right.

You said to give you time. I am willing to do so. But I myself do not think Cain is on the side of the town, I don't see how she possibly could be. She is pro human, yes, but will not hesitate to toss humans to the side if they get in her way. But if Cain proves to be benign, I am content to wait and watch.

Ok, let's just play the game like Cain isn't there for now. Chase your Win Condition, whatever it may be. The presence of Cain affects literally nothing unless she is alive when the last death happens. That's a long way away.

What are your thoughts on Wilgy?

Moderate suspicion I think. I have to reread, I can't nail him down on the fly at this moment.

Long Con, JaggedJimmyJay, and to an extent Ricochet, are all confirmed town along with at least a dozen other players.

"How do you know that?" he asked, knowing that zebra will intentionally refrain from clarifying a damn thing.

This ^^

I am suspicious of zebra, I think this is a ploy/tactic.

[Long Con]

I don't need sixty hours to decide who to vote for, let's please lynch sig today for the sake of town. Also stop asking people to mass claim Cylon!

Who would you want to put in second place - how likely do you think it is that sig will Cylon-claim if he has the vote majority? Your vote is somewhat rushed, surely you can see the importance of working together and planning together so as to avoid the Amnesty Act deciding this lynch in a Nerolunar kind of way.

Speaking of which, I'll just note that if Metalmarsh had not voted for Nerolunar on Day 2, and had instead voted for Lorab, all the results would be exactly the same at this point. We just wouldn't have had to get upset with MM.

But that development wouldn't have been nearly as fun for everyone involved.

I do like getting upset with you.

And don't think I didn't notice that crack about players massively screwing up.

[S~V~S]

The situation right now is not the same as it was three days ago. Three days from now, I think it is highly likely that the situation will also be not the same as right now. Players like Epignosis need to focus on the endgame, not only the present.

What's gonna happen in three days?

I might just be teasing you, I am not sure, tbh. I might also be asking a serious question. That just seems kind of ominous. But I may also be wearing a tinfoil hat that encloses my entire body at this point. Is three days the amount of time you were asking for when you asked for time?

[Long Con]

The situation right now is not the same as it was three days ago. Three days from now, I think it is highly likely that the situation will also be not the same as right now. Players like Epignosis need to focus on the endgame, not only the present.

What's gonna happen in three days?

I might just be teasing you, I am not sure, tbh. I might also be asking a serious question. That just seems kind of ominous. But I may also be wearing a tinfoil hat that encloses my entire body at this point. Is three days the amount of time you were asking for when you asked for time?

Three days would be just fine for enough time. I wasn't hinting at some three-days-from-now event of any kind. I just used three days as an arbitrary number of days ago that was far enough back to justify calling it a "different situation"... and then mirrored that forward in time in order to illustrate the point that the game will likely have changed shape in some way again by that point. It's total speculation - it's entirely possible that the game will be exactly the same as much as it can be at that point.

That's not really *the* point of what I said. You have not received the communication that I set out to convey. Is the failing mine or yours? Intentional or unintentional?

[ObscureAllure]

So Say We All!

Vote sig

Wasted vote. He claimed earlier and even though golden didn't count it, as soon as dig gets back he's going to claim again and be immune.

[ObscureAllure]

Long Con, JaggedJimmyJay, and to an extent Ricochet, are all confirmed town along with at least a dozen other players.

Stop saying confirmed town. Confirmed town either means the thread saw their role OR you're info dumping. But you're not punished so that means you have no actual info to confirm them, so still stop saying it.

[S~V~S]

The situation right now is not the same as it was three days ago. Three days from now, I think it is highly likely that the situation will also be not the same as right now. Players like Epignosis need to focus on the endgame, not only the present.

What's gonna happen in three days?

I might just be teasing you, I am not sure, tbh. I might also be asking a serious question. That just seems kind of ominous. But I may also be wearing a tinfoil hat that encloses my entire body at this point. Is three days the amount of time you were asking for when you asked for time?

Three days would be just fine for enough time. I wasn't hinting at some three-days-from-now event of any kind. I just used three days as an arbitrary number of days ago that was far enough back to justify calling it a "different situation"... and then mirrored that forward in time in order to illustrate the point that the game will likely have changed shape in some way again by that point. It's total speculation - it's entirely possible that the game will be exactly the same as much as it can be at that point.

That's not really *the* point of what I said. You have not received the communication that I set out to convey. Is the failing mine or yours? Intentional or unintentional?

I got all of it, but that specific time frame got my eye when you had said you wanted time. That was why I pulled that out to comment on. I have not voted you, right?

And yeah, re "confirmed" this means the host made a post saying these people are"insert civ role here". This did not happen. This will not happen, if I know Golden. And I do.

[S~V~S]

Well, it might happen in they are lynched & rezzed. Otherwise I don't see it.

And speaking of rezzes, I sent a sortie at 6:41 AM, about 5 hours ago. I may or may not be here in an hour, depends on work. SO someone might want to pick that up.

[Polo]

I'm going with my one of my gut reads. And as gullible as I may be, it's someone who hasn't claimed Cylon yet. Surprising?

Vote Glorfindel

Did not vote nutella on day 2;
Has yet to claim Cylon.

In an ideal scenario i'd be voting Zebra.

I'm gone for the rest of the day.

[Long Con]

The situation right now is not the same as it was three days ago. Three days from now, I think it is highly likely that the situation will also be not the same as right now. Players like Epignosis need to focus on the endgame, not only the present.

What's gonna happen in three days?

I might just be teasing you, I am not sure, tbh. I might also be asking a serious question. That just seems kind of ominous. But I may also be wearing a tinfoil hat that encloses my entire body at this point. Is three days the amount of time you were asking for when you asked for time?

Three days would be just fine for enough time. I wasn't hinting at some three-days-from-now event of any kind. I just used three days as an arbitrary number of days ago that was far enough back to justify calling it a "different situation"... and then mirrored that forward in time in order to illustrate the point that the game will likely have changed shape in some way again by that point. It's total speculation - it's entirely possible that the game will be exactly the same as much as it can be at that point.

That's not really *the* point of what I said. You have not received the communication that I set out to convey. Is the failing mine or yours? Intentional or unintentional?

I got all of it, but that specific time frame got my eye when you had said you wanted time. That was why I pulled that out to comment on.

Intentional then. On one hand, you used your response to do some mild fearmongering about me, and on the other:

I have not voted you, right?

...you seem willing to work with me on this.

Let's just talk about other things for a while.

[JaggedJimmyJay]

And I know 3J asked last night, but I have nothing new to raise. When I gave him the pretzel award, I don't think he was genuinely invested in what he was saying. He was making the evidence fit the conclusion he wanted.

Consider for a moment that you were the person of interest in the post I made that earned your pretzel award. I think you're letting personal bias cloud your judgment of me. I don't think any significant reaches were required to draw the conclusion that I drew relative to nutella and her interaction with you. I am less inclined to read you as bad at this point, but I don't think I was so off base before as you're asserting I would had to be (so far off base that it wasn't a sincere thought).

I didn't consider you to be reaching or stretching. That would have merited a taffy award. You got a pretzel award, for excellent twisting. For example, the suggestion you are making here is that, in order for you to be insincere, your post had to be "so far off base." That sounds right, but it's demonstrably untrue. Civilians say far more off-base things (see Matt), but that doesn't make them insincere.

Another example of something I find insincere is that you open your response with the suggestion that I am letting personal bias cloud my judgment of you. Even though it's been days later since you posted about nutella and me, and even though you say you don't think I'm bad, you think my opinion is clouded by personal bias? Where was that same criticism when I made a fuss about sig, who wanted to pile votes on me?

I don't know whether you're experiencing personal bias, but it's a thought I had. It's not just that "JJJ suspects me, therefore I suspect JJJ". It's that this read you are stating on me seems to have originated at that days-ago period of the game and it hasn't since adapted to the progressing circumstance of the game -- primarily the period of Day 2 in which my behavior was distinctly harmful to nutella's faction. It's "JJJ suspected me at one point in the game based upon a premise that I find dubious, therefore I suspect JJJ". That requires a lingering, prolonged doubt and I think a higher probability of a growing bias in your mindset.

I think that's human nature. Your example of the sig interaction is a great example, because I don't know what you're even talking about. I haven't paid close enough attention to the Epignosis-sig dynamic in this game yet because I haven't had a reason to do that. I may have observed it at some point, but it isn't something that I really noticed or absorbed. I have however paid plenty of attention to the Epignosis-JJJ dynamic. That dynamic is probably no more important in the grand scheme of this game than the Epignosis-sig dynamic, but I remember it more clearly because my own personal bias.

Ah, see, this is precisely what I'm talking about: I didn't suggest that people who do what you and Ricochet do are automatically bad because you do what you do. That would require me to think you two are bad in about every setup, and that has not been the case. I only said I have to decide when you are being genuine in what you do.

It's little business like this, and I think you are the kind of person that has to be caught on the minutiae. I believe you are less likely to make a massive blunder.

That's fair. If you're good then you have to read my shit and decide how you feel about it, even the small details. I think that inherently comes with a higher risk of overanalysis though, and this would be an example. Your focus is upon a small detail of my post history and I think it's causing you to overlook or disregard the larger details.

Like nutella. I think that matters and it needs to be addressed by those who suspect me.

[sig]

So I get all this shit for not claiming, then when I do it is a scummy opportunistic move...............

Again someone look through Zebra's posts she has posted almost no content, Polo keeps asking people who they'd like to lynch and why not so and so that is a basic scum move. I use that all the time as mafia.

[sig]

And Daisy is saying we should do the same thing that pushed Nero ahead of Lorab and what I wanted to do yesterday but on me. Both of which Polo thought was mafiash, but hasn't mentioned Daisy doing it.

If it comes down to me or Glorfindel you'll be choosing between two civs.

[JaggedJimmyJay]

So I get all this shit for not claiming, then when I do it is a scummy opportunistic move...............

Again someone look through Zebra's posts she has posted almost no content, Polo keeps asking people who they'd like to lynch and why not so and so that is a basic scum move. I use that all the time as mafia.

sig, I'm going to need you to acknowledge the reasons for that suspicion in a way that is not generalized and misrepresentative. Multiple people have been quite clear about why you're still suspicious, and what you just described is not an accurate depiction.

[G-Man]

So say we all.

Alright I am about five pages away from being caught up but I have a pile of invoices to enter. Once that's done I can spend the rest of the afternoon here with you guys (and updating my spreadsheet- she's hungry for notes and vote data and starting to growl at me in an unfriendly manner).

I have to merge my notes together. I left my flash drive at the office yesterday, so some of my notes are on my phone. As for my top three, I've got this so far:

1. Glorfindel
2. Sig
3. ?

I'm open to suggestions on #3. I'll throw more fuel on the Glorfindel fire once I get my notes organized.

[Ricochet]

Long Con, JaggedJimmyJay, and to an extent Ricochet, are all confirmed town along with at least a dozen other players.

If by confirmed Wazzipi you honest Karma Chameleon Cylon, then liar Long Con happens to suspicious that. clientship

[juliets]

So say we all. Yet
I can only say haiku
I will try my best

Had some things to do
This morning I will catch up
And give thoughts on posts

[Ricochet]

So Say We All!

Vote sig

Wasted vote. He claimed earlier and even though golden didn't count it, as soon as dig gets back he's going to claim again and be immune.

If sig Hot Soup we consomme him top and see if tabulation turns Gryphon, then?

[JaggedJimmyJay]

Theory: if sig is bad, he is trying to fuse himself to Glorfindel.

[Ricochet]

zebra is reywaS nincompoop salute

I'm going with my one of my gut reads. And as gullible as I may be, it's someone who hasn't claimed Cylon yet. Surprising?

Vote Glorfindel

Did not vote nutella on day 2;
Has yet to claim Cylon.

In an ideal scenario i'd be voting Zebra.

I'm gone for the rest of the day.

stoup about days two and sike?

[Polo]

This game is addicting and I'll try to stop by every couple of hours or so. I do have a tough deadline for monday though.....

So I get all this shit for not claiming, then when I do it is a scummy opportunistic move...............

Again someone look through Zebra's posts she has posted almost no content, Polo keeps asking people who they'd like to lynch and why not so and so that is a basic scum move. I use that all the time as mafia.

First of all, your claim wasn't worth anything. See Golden's response.

Zebra was trying to buddy on me and I don't want any of that. You also said she posted almost no content. Did you base your Day 4 vote on Zebra on what?

And Daisy is saying we should do the same thing that pushed Nero ahead of Lorab and what I wanted to do yesterday but on me. Both of which Polo thought was mafiash, but hasn't mentioned Daisy doing it.

If it comes down to me or Glorfindel you'll be choosing between two civs.

Do you have BTSC with Glorfindel? Do you agree that, now that over half of the players have claimed Cylon, the rest should claim too? Do you think the Cylon Amnesty Act is in the best interest of town?

Daisy claimed mafia and right now I want to pressure the Cylons to use up their claim asap.

[Polo]

EBWOP: I meant ass-claim.

[Ricochet]

Daisy claimed mafia and right now I want to pressure the Cylons to use up their claim asap.

whatCheshire Cat?

===

Anyone under the bus saltpeter Vompatti? I wouldn't anagoge conjuring accouter for a bit, Villager now and then.

[Polo]

Man, this is just weird. The guy says Zebra has posted almost no content; the same guy voted a2thezebra on Day 4 lynch and then gets his jimmies rustled because I would like to vote her today.
I kinda regret voting Glorfindel now.

[sig]

So I get all this shit for not claiming, then when I do it is a scummy opportunistic move...............

Again someone look through Zebra's posts she has posted almost no content, Polo keeps asking people who they'd like to lynch and why not so and so that is a basic scum move. I use that all the time as mafia.

sig, I'm going to need you to acknowledge the reasons for that suspicion in a way that is not generalized and misrepresentative. Multiple people have been quite clear about why you're still suspicious, and what you just described is not an accurate depiction.

That is one of the reasons started by Scotty/Polo what are the others since I can't recall any real reasons besides the one i states and my push on Epi and other cylons. People just keep repeating I'm bad. And now you're saying I'm fusing myself to Glorf, which isn't true since it looks like it's coming down to him and me atm.

Polo I can't answer that either way it would be infodumping.

linki: Wait what polo? I'm rustled from your general behavior plus when did you say you wanted to vote for her? You've been pushing me and Glorfindel. It has nothing to do with Zebra who you're now saying you want lynched yet voted for someone else super early?

[Polo]

Daisy claimed mafia and right now I want to pressure the Cylons to use up their claim asap.

whatCheshire Cat?

Here you go:

Ok.... So I have to choose between voting Nero or Lorab?

Clearly Lorab would've a poor choice for a vote since she likely has amnesty. I need to go read back through Nero's posts.

I must say I am shocked more people aren't suspecting me, because I am well aware how bad my post about Nutella looked after her flip. I would ask that my emotional instability at that moment not keep you all from suspecting me as normal, I assure you I'm fine now.

Not much time; going to go check out Nero. Regarding Lorab though, I am trying to think what colons might be civ aligned other than Athena and frankly I'm not sure, anyone have a thought on whether there are those that might be?

Linki: I have no problem declaring I am a cylon in order to follow this plan, I think it's a decent idea. So I am a Cylon.

Also, in case Lorab is trying a ploy to save herself by convincing others votes for her are useless, I am putting my vote on Lorab. If the math prevents anyone but Nero getting the second most votes at this point I don't see any other worthwhile place to put my vote. It will ensure we know for certain her claim is true and avoid any shenanigans she might be trying to pull. So instead of reading Nero before voting (which is apparently pointless) I'm going to vote Lorab.

Vote: Lorab

[Ricochet]

This game is addicting and I'll try to stop by every couple of hours or so.

Told you five Chaos Wizard ago in a Hungarian metro, Ender.

[Marmot]

So I get all this shit for not claiming, then when I do it is a scummy opportunistic move...............

Again someone look through Zebra's posts she has posted almost no content, Polo keeps asking people who they'd like to lynch and why not so and so that is a basic scum move. I use that all the time as mafia.

Zebra's posted content, she just hasn't backed some of it up.

[Polo]

This game is addicting and I'll try to stop by every couple of hours or so.

Told you five Chaos Wizard ago in a Hungarian metro, Ender.

I miss Budapest.

I need to try the tabbouleh from Timisoara you mentioned someday.

[ObscureAllure]

zebra is reywaS nincompoop salute

nincompoop salute HAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHA

[Marmot]

Zebra's probably posted more content than I have.

[Polo]

So I get all this shit for not claiming, then when I do it is a scummy opportunistic move...............

Again someone look through Zebra's posts she has posted almost no content, Polo keeps asking people who they'd like to lynch and why not so and so that is a basic scum move. I use that all the time as mafia.

sig, I'm going to need you to acknowledge the reasons for that suspicion in a way that is not generalized and misrepresentative. Multiple people have been quite clear about why you're still suspicious, and what you just described is not an accurate depiction.

That is one of the reasons started by Scotty/Polo what are the others since I can't recall any real reasons besides the one i states and my push on Epi and other cylons. People just keep repeating I'm bad. And now you're saying I'm fusing myself to Glorf, which isn't true since it looks like it's coming down to him and me atm.

Polo I can't answer that either way it would be infodumping.

linki: Wait what polo? I'm rustled from your general behavior plus when did you say you wanted to vote for her? You've been pushing me and Glorfindel. It has nothing to do with Zebra who you're now saying you want lynched yet voted for someone else super early?

I'm going with my one of my gut reads. And as gullible as I may be, it's someone who hasn't claimed Cylon yet. Surprising?

Vote Glorfindel

Did not vote nutella on day 2;
Has yet to claim Cylon.

In an ideal scenario i'd be voting Zebra.

I'm gone for the rest of the day.

Over there.

I'll be pushing for anyone who hasn't claimed yet unless they make a very good case on someone else. If the Cylon Amnesty Act is not overturned by the President, the people can make it ineffective. But I do think that there may be a couple of people who can not ever say "I am a Cylon" for role reasons.

[JaggedJimmyJay]

Metalmarsh89's probably made more posts than I have.

[Marmot]

Metalmarsh89's probably made more posts than I have.

Fact.

Thus, Jay is confirmed scum.

[JaggedJimmyJay]

It's getting tiresome how 3J "never remembers" the So say we all.

Agreed. Every time I remind myself to do it, then I get side tracked with something, then I come back and make a post with no SSWA like a doofus.

just hella suspect tbh. Hrm.

Why?

[Polo]

It's getting tiresome how 3J "never remembers" the So say we all.

Agreed. Every time I remind myself to do it, then I get side tracked with something, then I come back and make a post with no SSWA like a doofus.

just hella suspect tbh. Hrm.

Why?

Could there be a role that is unable to say "So say we all"?

[Ricochet]

Daisy claimed mafia and right now I want to pressure the Cylons to use up their claim asap.

whatCheshire Cat?

Here you go:

So I am a Cylon.

Daisy claimed mafia

[Ricochet]

EBWOP

Daisy claimed mafia and right now I want to pressure the Cylons to use up their claim asap.

whatCheshire Cat?

Here you go:

So I am a Cylon.

Daisy claimed mafia

[Polo]

Dude, sorry! Got them mixed up!