GAME OVER: BLUE vs. RED
Moderator: Community Team
- Marmot
- Marmot
- Posts in topic: 185
- Posts: 30973
- Joined: Sat Jan 11, 2014 11:21 am
- Location: Oregon
- Gender: Genderfluid
- Preferred Pronouns: they/them
- Aka: Marmot
- Contact:
Re: Night 3- BLUE vs. RED
Goddamit.
Banners and Stuff
Spoiler: show
Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Wed Dec 16, 2020 7:33 pm Just how many days of "let's yeet them tomorrow" can a mafioso survive?
The answer: all of them, if you are a marmot.
- Marmot
- Marmot
- Posts in topic: 185
- Posts: 30973
- Joined: Sat Jan 11, 2014 11:21 am
- Location: Oregon
- Gender: Genderfluid
- Preferred Pronouns: they/them
- Aka: Marmot
- Contact:
Re: Night 3- BLUE vs. RED
Well I'll just sacrifice my vote to let my voice be heard.
I am Marmot, hear me shriek!!!
I am Marmot, hear me shriek!!!
Banners and Stuff
Spoiler: show
Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Wed Dec 16, 2020 7:33 pm Just how many days of "let's yeet them tomorrow" can a mafioso survive?
The answer: all of them, if you are a marmot.
- G-Man
- Made Man
- Posts in topic: 70
- Posts: 7583
- Joined: Wed Feb 25, 2015 10:13 pm
- Location: Pennsylvania
- Contact:
Re: Night 3- BLUE vs. RED
EVERY LITTLE THING SHE DOES IS MAGIC
(TUESDAY, JANUARY 24, 2017)
MIKA: After a tumultuous start to her administration, President Hillary Clinton seems to have finally earned a much-needed night of respite. As of this hour, there are no new reports of any new turmoil inside the Clinton Administration, though that's not for a lack of trying by some Republicans. JOE: That's right, Mika. Conservative outlets and media personalities are continuing an all-out assault against President Clinton, trying to connect her to the mysterious Operation Cobalt and deem her unfit for office due to perceived or imagined health issues and alleged conflicts of interest. There's one thing they're missing on all of these fronts though.
MIKA: Evidence, of course.
JOE: Precisely. Look, I appreciate the humor in Ted Cruz's phantom group's choice of name. Vast Right-Wing Conspiracy goes back to Bill Clinton's administration and is a cheeky cheap shot at our current President. But so many people have been coming at the Clintons for years, so the only reason this stuff isn't relegated to background noise is because Hillary is President now.
MIKA: They keep trying though. Listen to what Steve Bannon, head of the fringe-Right website Breitbart, said in a recent editorial- "For the good of the country, people need to wake up and realize that the alternative facts that we are presenting have merit. The liberal media machine is oppressing millions by controlling what they believe to be true."
JOE: My God. Alternative facts? What the hell are alternative facts?
MIKA: I think we used to call them rumors, conspiracy theories, half-truths, and outright lies. Now I guess they're alternative facts.
----------------------------------
No one has died.
It is now Day 4.
You have 48 hours to lynch someone.
No one has died.
It is now Day 4.
You have 48 hours to lynch someone.
- Long Con
- So Divine
- Posts in topic: 184
- Posts: 22847
- Joined: Sun Oct 20, 2013 12:57 pm
- Location: Canada
- Gender: Dude
- Preferred Pronouns: boy ones
Re: Night 3- BLUE vs. RED
So, here's the post totals as of now:G-Man wrote:THE WHITE HOUSE
Section 3. Implementation and Coverage Formula Composition. Beginning on Tuesday, January 24, 2017, all speech conducted within The Syndicate from the time the current administration took office will be certified and tallied. All current members of The Syndicate will have their vote values reassessed in a manner that provides for the same total number of votes to be cast but the votes of individuals will be weighted in the inverse order of their current speech volumes.
Epignosis 191
Marmot 105
Long Con 103
DrWilgy 99
thellama73 97
Quin 93
MacDougall 74
notsawyer540 49
DFaraday 17
TheFloyd73 6
So, Floyd's vote is worth lots, and Epi's is worth very little.
- Marmot
- Marmot
- Posts in topic: 185
- Posts: 30973
- Joined: Sat Jan 11, 2014 11:21 am
- Location: Oregon
- Gender: Genderfluid
- Preferred Pronouns: they/them
- Aka: Marmot
- Contact:
Re: Day 4- BLUE vs. RED
I miss jack tbh.
Banners and Stuff
Spoiler: show
Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Wed Dec 16, 2020 7:33 pm Just how many days of "let's yeet them tomorrow" can a mafioso survive?
The answer: all of them, if you are a marmot.
- MacDougall
- Out of my scumrange
- Posts in topic: 102
- Posts: 39787
- Joined: Wed Sep 23, 2015 2:37 am
Re: Day 4- BLUE vs. RED
Let's lynch Floyd.
Re: Day 4- BLUE vs. RED
Typical Democrat. Caring the most about those who contribute the least.
Stream my music for free: https://epignosis.bandcamp.com/
Re: Day 4- BLUE vs. RED
I like this though.
There can only be three power roles in the game. Two of them are gone.
A smart fellow might reason that I wouldn't place myself in this unfortunate circumstance, especially with people thirsting for my blood.
This places the mafia in a dilemma: Either kill me and leave the remaining power role alive, or hunt for the remaining power role and have to put up with me another phase.
There can only be three power roles in the game. Two of them are gone.
A smart fellow might reason that I wouldn't place myself in this unfortunate circumstance, especially with people thirsting for my blood.
This places the mafia in a dilemma: Either kill me and leave the remaining power role alive, or hunt for the remaining power role and have to put up with me another phase.
Stream my music for free: https://epignosis.bandcamp.com/
- Marmot
- Marmot
- Posts in topic: 185
- Posts: 30973
- Joined: Sat Jan 11, 2014 11:21 am
- Location: Oregon
- Gender: Genderfluid
- Preferred Pronouns: they/them
- Aka: Marmot
- Contact:
Re: Day 4- BLUE vs. RED
Thanks for the protection whoever protected me.
Banners and Stuff
Spoiler: show
Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Wed Dec 16, 2020 7:33 pm Just how many days of "let's yeet them tomorrow" can a mafioso survive?
The answer: all of them, if you are a marmot.
- Quin
- Indecent Bastard
- Posts in topic: 109
- Posts: 10900
- Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2016 1:08 am
- Location: The Future
Re: Day 4- BLUE vs. RED
It's good to be average.
- Long Con
- So Divine
- Posts in topic: 184
- Posts: 22847
- Joined: Sun Oct 20, 2013 12:57 pm
- Location: Canada
- Gender: Dude
- Preferred Pronouns: boy ones
Re: Day 4- BLUE vs. RED
I didn't protect you, I protected Epignosis!Marmot wrote:Thanks for the protection whoever protected me.
Re: Day 4- BLUE vs. RED
Yeah, lie detectable statements really do a lot of good for protectors.Long Con wrote:I didn't protect you, I protected Epignosis!Marmot wrote:Thanks for the protection whoever protected me.
Stream my music for free: https://epignosis.bandcamp.com/
- Long Con
- So Divine
- Posts in topic: 184
- Posts: 22847
- Joined: Sun Oct 20, 2013 12:57 pm
- Location: Canada
- Gender: Dude
- Preferred Pronouns: boy ones
Re: Day 4- BLUE vs. RED
Epignosis wrote:Yeah, lie detectable statements really do a lot of good for protectors.Long Con wrote:I didn't protect you, I protected Epignosis!Marmot wrote:Thanks for the protection whoever protected me.
Re: Day 4- BLUE vs. RED
Floyd.
Mr. Man.
Say a thing.
Who is getting your vote and dying?
Mr. Man.
Say a thing.
Who is getting your vote and dying?
Stream my music for free: https://epignosis.bandcamp.com/
Re: Day 4- BLUE vs. RED
Don't feel like talking?
Didn't think so.
Didn't think so.
Stream my music for free: https://epignosis.bandcamp.com/
Re: Day 4- BLUE vs. RED
I want to know the following from everybody:
1. Where you stand on notsawyer and why.
2. Where you stand on Marmot and why.
3. Where you stand on Floyd and why.
4. Where you stand on DFaraday and why.
5. Where you stand on Quin and why.
6. Where you stand on thellama73 and why.
7. Where you stand on Long Con and why.
You get the idea. If I left you out, it wasn't personal.
Start talking. Tell me why you're good. Tell me why others are bad. Go.
1. Where you stand on notsawyer and why.
2. Where you stand on Marmot and why.
3. Where you stand on Floyd and why.
4. Where you stand on DFaraday and why.
5. Where you stand on Quin and why.
6. Where you stand on thellama73 and why.
7. Where you stand on Long Con and why.
You get the idea. If I left you out, it wasn't personal.
Start talking. Tell me why you're good. Tell me why others are bad. Go.
Stream my music for free: https://epignosis.bandcamp.com/
Re: Day 4- BLUE vs. RED
MM's vote is on notsawyer right now. Why?
Wasn't he your big buddy to help take me down?
Wasn't he your big buddy to help take me down?
Stream my music for free: https://epignosis.bandcamp.com/
Re: Day 4- BLUE vs. RED
I don't understand MM this game. Mr. "I Would Never Kill Epignosis" A) Hasn't killed me and B) Tried to lynch me knowing I wouldn't kill Eloh.
He goes in the naughty pile.
He goes in the naughty pile.
Stream my music for free: https://epignosis.bandcamp.com/
Re: Day 4- BLUE vs. RED
Long Con goes in the naughty pile for being Long Con and asking me to trust him. Fuck that.
Stream my music for free: https://epignosis.bandcamp.com/
Re: Day 4- BLUE vs. RED
thellama73?
This is someone I would lynch. Look at his posts in relation to me. Does he want to accuse me or buddy up to me? Even he doesn't know.
Shit heap. That's where he goes.
This is someone I would lynch. Look at his posts in relation to me. Does he want to accuse me or buddy up to me? Even he doesn't know.
Shit heap. That's where he goes.
Stream my music for free: https://epignosis.bandcamp.com/
Re: Day 4- BLUE vs. RED
DF is back in the naughty pile. Speak. Help civilians win.
Stream my music for free: https://epignosis.bandcamp.com/
Re: Day 4- BLUE vs. RED
I will not suffer a Day phase of Anti-Epi. I want mafia destroyed. Talk ye Democrats.
Stream my music for free: https://epignosis.bandcamp.com/
Re: Day 4- BLUE vs. RED
I'm working on responding to your lengthy request right now.Epignosis wrote:DF is back in the naughty pile. Speak. Help civilians win.
Spoiler: show
Re: Day 4- BLUE vs. RED
Good. I'm going to bed.DFaraday wrote:I'm working on responding to your lengthy request right now.Epignosis wrote:DF is back in the naughty pile. Speak. Help civilians win.
Stream my music for free: https://epignosis.bandcamp.com/
Re: Day 4- BLUE vs. RED
Epignosis wrote:I want to know the following from everybody:
1. Where you stand on notsawyer and why.
I'm leaning bad on Notsawyer because he is tunneling Epi, forcing the facts to fit his suspicion (ie., blaming Epi alone for SVS's lynch), and cites Epi's lack of caught baddies despite the fact that Notsawyer is hardly looking at anyone but Epi, and so has also caught no baddies.
2. Where you stand on Marmot and why.
Rereading his posts, I'm finding him to be pretty inconsistent. First he cites some mild suspicion, decides to vote her over Jack, then the next day says that he's glad everyone is "seeing sense" and voting Jack, despite making a case on Epi and continually pushing it throughout that phase. I'm leaning bad towards MM, but not as much as I am Notsawyer.
3. Where you stand on Floyd and why.
The lack of a kill could indicate that the remaining baddies are uninvolved, which would implicate Floyd more than anyone (and me next, I'm aware). I'm slightly leaning bad on Floyd.
4. Where you stand on DFaraday and why.
Vanilla Civvie all the way.
5. Where you stand on Quin and why.
I don't really recall Quin's activity this game. I'll need to look into him.
6. Where you stand on thellama73 and why.
If I'm right about Notsawyer being bad, it's unlikely Llama also is given the timing of his vote for Notsawyer on Day 1, when the lynch could still have gone that way. His Jack suspicion was also consistent and felt genuine. Leaning civ.
7. Where you stand on Long Con and why.
LC hasn't felt entirely involved in this game, like he's trying to keep out of the limelight. I don't have suspicions of him per se, but I don't really feel civ about him.
You get the idea. If I left you out, it wasn't personal.
Start talking. Tell me why you're good. Tell me why others are bad. Go.
Spoiler: show
- Marmot
- Marmot
- Posts in topic: 185
- Posts: 30973
- Joined: Sat Jan 11, 2014 11:21 am
- Location: Oregon
- Gender: Genderfluid
- Preferred Pronouns: they/them
- Aka: Marmot
- Contact:
Re: Day 4- BLUE vs. RED
If there's a protector, there's no lie detector, remember?Epignosis wrote:Yeah, lie detectable statements really do a lot of good for protectors.Long Con wrote:I didn't protect you, I protected Epignosis!Marmot wrote:Thanks for the protection whoever protected me.
Banners and Stuff
Spoiler: show
Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Wed Dec 16, 2020 7:33 pm Just how many days of "let's yeet them tomorrow" can a mafioso survive?
The answer: all of them, if you are a marmot.
- Marmot
- Marmot
- Posts in topic: 185
- Posts: 30973
- Joined: Sat Jan 11, 2014 11:21 am
- Location: Oregon
- Gender: Genderfluid
- Preferred Pronouns: they/them
- Aka: Marmot
- Contact:
Re: Day 4- BLUE vs. RED
My goal is to lynch the mafia, not take you down.Epignosis wrote:MM's vote is on notsawyer right now. Why?
Wasn't he your big buddy to help take me down?
Yesterday I thought you were mafia. Today I'm doubting that notion. There's not a chance in hell that you and notsawyer are teammates, and I think he looks worse than you at the moment.
I already told you I'm ignoring that assertion. How do you know you weren't attempted to be killed last night.Epignosis wrote:I don't understand MM this game. Mr. "I Would Never Kill Epignosis" A) Hasn't killed me and B) Tried to lynch me knowing I wouldn't kill Eloh.
He goes in the naughty pile.
Lay off you fiend.
Banners and Stuff
Spoiler: show
Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Wed Dec 16, 2020 7:33 pm Just how many days of "let's yeet them tomorrow" can a mafioso survive?
The answer: all of them, if you are a marmot.
- Marmot
- Marmot
- Posts in topic: 185
- Posts: 30973
- Joined: Sat Jan 11, 2014 11:21 am
- Location: Oregon
- Gender: Genderfluid
- Preferred Pronouns: they/them
- Aka: Marmot
- Contact:
Re: Day 4- BLUE vs. RED
I just won $15 playing Texas Hold'em this evening. Take that!
Banners and Stuff
Spoiler: show
Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Wed Dec 16, 2020 7:33 pm Just how many days of "let's yeet them tomorrow" can a mafioso survive?
The answer: all of them, if you are a marmot.
- Marmot
- Marmot
- Posts in topic: 185
- Posts: 30973
- Joined: Sat Jan 11, 2014 11:21 am
- Location: Oregon
- Gender: Genderfluid
- Preferred Pronouns: they/them
- Aka: Marmot
- Contact:
Re: Day 4- BLUE vs. RED
Why does everyone go in the shit heap? There's only two mafia left.Epignosis wrote:thellama73?
This is someone I would lynch. Look at his posts in relation to me. Does he want to accuse me or buddy up to me? Even he doesn't know.
Shit heap. That's where he goes.
Banners and Stuff
Spoiler: show
Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Wed Dec 16, 2020 7:33 pm Just how many days of "let's yeet them tomorrow" can a mafioso survive?
The answer: all of them, if you are a marmot.
- thellama73
- Supatown
- Posts in topic: 179
- Posts: 12623
- Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2013 8:29 pm
- Location: Murder Park
Re: Day 4- BLUE vs. RED
Hey guys, I wanted to quickly note that I've been on a two day intensive video shoot for work, today being the second day, so that's why I haven't been around. I should be finished this after noon and will be back to participate. Sorry for my inactivity, and yay no death!
Epignosis wrote:If llama is good, it means we exist in a universe in which multitasking llama can call out the first of two mafia while simultaneously calling out two civilians.
I don't want to live in that universe.
Spoiler: show
- Quin
- Indecent Bastard
- Posts in topic: 109
- Posts: 10900
- Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2016 1:08 am
- Location: The Future
Re: Day 4- BLUE vs. RED
Is anyone else having an issue where you hit submit on a post and it just doesn't appear? Rip my post
Condensed:
- I haven't been paying attention
- I'll catch up in the morning, but I'll be gone for 2 days from tomorrow
- I still stand by my case on sawyer.
Condensed:
- I haven't been paying attention
- I'll catch up in the morning, but I'll be gone for 2 days from tomorrow
- I still stand by my case on sawyer.
- thellama73
- Supatown
- Posts in topic: 179
- Posts: 12623
- Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2013 8:29 pm
- Location: Murder Park
Re: Day 4- BLUE vs. RED
Wilgy is the other baddie, though.Epignosis wrote:I want to know the following from everybody:
1. Where you stand on notsawyer and why.
I think Sawyer has looked bad from Day 1. His equivocating, his dismissiveness, and his case on you seems forced. He is getting my vote today.
2. Where you stand on Marmot and why.
I currently have no suspicions of Metalmarsh89.
3. Where you stand on Floyd and why.
Floyd is absentee, which could explain the lack of a kill last night, but we've had other kills. He's probably a typical absentee civvie.
4. Where you stand on DFaraday and why.
I do not really understand the case on DF. No reason to distrust him yet.
5. Where you stand on Quin and why.
I'm leaning civ on Quin now after my meta analysis of his past games.
6. Where you stand on thellama73 and why.
Supatown.
7. Where you stand on Long Con and why.
I can't read LC. It wouldn't surprise me if he were bad.
You get the idea. If I left you out, it wasn't personal.
Start talking. Tell me why you're good. Tell me why others are bad. Go.
Epignosis wrote:If llama is good, it means we exist in a universe in which multitasking llama can call out the first of two mafia while simultaneously calling out two civilians.
I don't want to live in that universe.
Spoiler: show
- Long Con
- So Divine
- Posts in topic: 184
- Posts: 22847
- Joined: Sun Oct 20, 2013 12:57 pm
- Location: Canada
- Gender: Dude
- Preferred Pronouns: boy ones
Re: Day 4- BLUE vs. RED
1. Where you stand on notsawyer and why.
I'm kind of okay with notsawyer. Epignosis' suspicion of him has some influence on me, but overall I think this interaction is civ/civ. I think his accusations seem genuine enough, even if I don't agree with them.
2. Where you stand on Marmot and why.
Leaning scum on Marmot. His latest claim, that he was nightkilled but protected, feels like a) an attempt to look civ, and b) an attempt to draw out information from the baddies. That's why I countered him a little with my own jokey misinformation.
3. Where you stand on Floyd and why.
I stand on Floyd in the gutter, because that's where I assume he is lying, dead drunk or just plain dead. Does he get some sort of points for just signing up for Mafia games? I don't get this guy.
4. Where you stand on DFaraday and why.
I feel pretty good about DFaraday, but I don't know why right now. ISO 2
5. Where you stand on Quin and why.
Now both you and DF have said you forgot Quin was playing. I'm getting some alarm bells from Quin's direction. ISO 1.
6. Where you stand on thellama73 and why.
I'm cool with Llama now for reasons I won't really get into.
7. Where you stand on Long Con and why.
I don't think Long Con is trying to be out of the limelight. I think I've done some stand-out stuff. My Llama suspicions, my lie detector stuff... that's not blendy.
I'm kind of okay with notsawyer. Epignosis' suspicion of him has some influence on me, but overall I think this interaction is civ/civ. I think his accusations seem genuine enough, even if I don't agree with them.
2. Where you stand on Marmot and why.
Leaning scum on Marmot. His latest claim, that he was nightkilled but protected, feels like a) an attempt to look civ, and b) an attempt to draw out information from the baddies. That's why I countered him a little with my own jokey misinformation.
3. Where you stand on Floyd and why.
I stand on Floyd in the gutter, because that's where I assume he is lying, dead drunk or just plain dead. Does he get some sort of points for just signing up for Mafia games? I don't get this guy.
4. Where you stand on DFaraday and why.
I feel pretty good about DFaraday, but I don't know why right now. ISO 2
5. Where you stand on Quin and why.
Now both you and DF have said you forgot Quin was playing. I'm getting some alarm bells from Quin's direction. ISO 1.
6. Where you stand on thellama73 and why.
I'm cool with Llama now for reasons I won't really get into.
7. Where you stand on Long Con and why.
I don't think Long Con is trying to be out of the limelight. I think I've done some stand-out stuff. My Llama suspicions, my lie detector stuff... that's not blendy.
- notsawyer540
- The Mark
- Posts in topic: 103
- Posts: 272
- Joined: Wed Nov 16, 2016 1:28 am
Re: Day 4- BLUE vs. RED
I'm going to be out of the house until this evening. I'll catch back up and post my overall thoughts on everyone as soon as I get a chance.
One question I would like answered is: Have I really been forcing evidence to fit my conclusions, or has Epi's Fox-News-style misrepresentation of facts and events fooled too many of you?
One question I would like answered is: Have I really been forcing evidence to fit my conclusions, or has Epi's Fox-News-style misrepresentation of facts and events fooled too many of you?
- Long Con
- So Divine
- Posts in topic: 184
- Posts: 22847
- Joined: Sun Oct 20, 2013 12:57 pm
- Location: Canada
- Gender: Dude
- Preferred Pronouns: boy ones
Re: Day 4- BLUE vs. RED
Ugh, I went back to refresh myself on the background of the "Fox News" accusation. What I found in the latest exchange was Epi citing evidence that he's a Civ, and you asking for the evidence, and Epi putting together a pretty credible-looking post with his evidence... and you never really responded until your latest post just now.notsawyer540 wrote:I'm going to be out of the house until this evening. I'll catch back up and post my overall thoughts on everyone as soon as I get a chance.
One question I would like answered is: Have I really been forcing evidence to fit my conclusions, or has Epi's Fox-News-style misrepresentation of facts and events fooled too many of you?
Explain the Fox News metaphor for me, and let me know which Epi post or posts that I can see it in action.
Right now, this sounds like some sort of slick, sinister salesmanship. I already don't agree that Epi is bad, and the way you phrased that question just rubbed my ass-hair the wrong way.
- Marmot
- Marmot
- Posts in topic: 185
- Posts: 30973
- Joined: Sat Jan 11, 2014 11:21 am
- Location: Oregon
- Gender: Genderfluid
- Preferred Pronouns: they/them
- Aka: Marmot
- Contact:
Re: Day 4- BLUE vs. RED
I don't get it Long Con. What's wrong with trying to draw information out from the baddies?Long Con wrote:2. Where you stand on Marmot and why.
Leaning scum on Marmot. His latest claim, that he was nightkilled but protected, feels like a) an attempt to look civ, and b) an attempt to draw out information from the baddies. That's why I countered him a little with my own jokey misinformation.
Banners and Stuff
Spoiler: show
Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Wed Dec 16, 2020 7:33 pm Just how many days of "let's yeet them tomorrow" can a mafioso survive?
The answer: all of them, if you are a marmot.
- Long Con
- So Divine
- Posts in topic: 184
- Posts: 22847
- Joined: Sun Oct 20, 2013 12:57 pm
- Location: Canada
- Gender: Dude
- Preferred Pronouns: boy ones
Re: Day 4- BLUE vs. RED
EBWOP: *FOR the baddiesMarmot wrote:I don't get it Long Con. What's wrong with trying to draw information out from the baddies?Long Con wrote:2. Where you stand on Marmot and why.
Leaning scum on Marmot. His latest claim, that he was nightkilled but protected, feels like a) an attempt to look civ, and b) an attempt to draw out information from the baddies. That's why I countered him a little with my own jokey misinformation.
- Marmot
- Marmot
- Posts in topic: 185
- Posts: 30973
- Joined: Sat Jan 11, 2014 11:21 am
- Location: Oregon
- Gender: Genderfluid
- Preferred Pronouns: they/them
- Aka: Marmot
- Contact:
Re: Day 4- BLUE vs. RED
FixedLong Con wrote:EBWOP: *FOR the baddies ... because I'm bad.Marmot wrote:I don't get it Long Con. What's wrong with trying to draw information out from the baddies?Long Con wrote:2. Where you stand on Marmot and why.
Leaning scum on Marmot. His latest claim, that he was nightkilled but protected, feels like a) an attempt to look civ, and b) an attempt to draw out information from the baddies. That's why I countered him a little with my own jokey misinformation.
Banners and Stuff
Spoiler: show
Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Wed Dec 16, 2020 7:33 pm Just how many days of "let's yeet them tomorrow" can a mafioso survive?
The answer: all of them, if you are a marmot.
Re: Day 4- BLUE vs. RED
DFaraday wrote:Epignosis wrote:I want to know the following from everybody:
1. Where you stand on notsawyer and why.
I'm leaning bad on Notsawyer because he is tunneling Epi, forcing the facts to fit his suspicion (ie., blaming Epi alone for SVS's lynch), and cites Epi's lack of caught baddies despite the fact that Notsawyer is hardly looking at anyone but Epi, and so has also caught no baddies.
thellama73 wrote:Epignosis wrote:I want to know the following from everybody:
1. Where you stand on notsawyer and why.
I think Sawyer has looked bad from Day 1. His equivocating, his dismissiveness, and his case on you seems forced. He is getting my vote today.
I am of two minds on notsawyer. If he were a Syndicate regular, someone with whom I had experience interacting with, I might have a clearer opinion of him, because a stubborn insistence is a trait I am more likely to believe comes from a civilian. Consider: If he's mafia, then he knows I'm not bad, so what's his exit strategy should he prove successful? I call that short-term gain, long-term loss.Long Con wrote:1. Where you stand on notsawyer and why.
I'm kind of okay with notsawyer. Epignosis' suspicion of him has some influence on me, but overall I think this interaction is civ/civ. I think his accusations seem genuine enough, even if I don't agree with them.
Moreover, notsawyer is taking three votes right from the get-go and his reaction to all this is to double down on his smear campaign:
In his first post since the Day began, he asks a loaded question and uses the phrase "misrepresentation of facts" without mentioning a single fact I misrepresented. And he asked me for evidence, and when I gave him plenty, he had nothing to say about it. That's not encouraging.notsawyer540 wrote:I'm going to be out of the house until this evening. I'll catch back up and post my overall thoughts on everyone as soon as I get a chance.
One question I would like answered is: Have I really been forcing evidence to fit my conclusions, or has Epi's Fox-News-style misrepresentation of facts and events fooled too many of you?
Still, if notsawyer is mafia, then he has accomplished nothing more than setting himself for the lynch today without even the consolation prize of getting me lynched first- and he doesn't seem fazed by that.
Stream my music for free: https://epignosis.bandcamp.com/
Re: Day 4- BLUE vs. RED
Llama, you used a curious word in describing notsawyer: "Equivocating." How does this adjective apply to notsawyer? "Resolute" or "stubborn" is the word I would have used.
Stream my music for free: https://epignosis.bandcamp.com/
- Marmot
- Marmot
- Posts in topic: 185
- Posts: 30973
- Joined: Sat Jan 11, 2014 11:21 am
- Location: Oregon
- Gender: Genderfluid
- Preferred Pronouns: they/them
- Aka: Marmot
- Contact:
Re: Day 4- BLUE vs. RED
I don't know if he realizes that he has votes.Epignosis wrote:Moreover, notsawyer is taking three votes right from the get-go and his reaction to all this is to double down on his smear campaign:
Banners and Stuff
Spoiler: show
Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Wed Dec 16, 2020 7:33 pm Just how many days of "let's yeet them tomorrow" can a mafioso survive?
The answer: all of them, if you are a marmot.
Re: Day 4- BLUE vs. RED
Which means no teammate has informed him of this fact.Marmot wrote:I don't know if he realizes that he has votes.Epignosis wrote:Moreover, notsawyer is taking three votes right from the get-go and his reaction to all this is to double down on his smear campaign:
Stream my music for free: https://epignosis.bandcamp.com/
- Marmot
- Marmot
- Posts in topic: 185
- Posts: 30973
- Joined: Sat Jan 11, 2014 11:21 am
- Location: Oregon
- Gender: Genderfluid
- Preferred Pronouns: they/them
- Aka: Marmot
- Contact:
Re: Day 4- BLUE vs. RED
Epignosis wrote:Which means no teammate has informed him of this fact.Marmot wrote:I don't know if he realizes that he has votes.Epignosis wrote:Moreover, notsawyer is taking three votes right from the get-go and his reaction to all this is to double down on his smear campaign:
I don't know if you're defending him or suggesting he has a teammate who hasn't been around today. Both are plausible.
Banners and Stuff
Spoiler: show
Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Wed Dec 16, 2020 7:33 pm Just how many days of "let's yeet them tomorrow" can a mafioso survive?
The answer: all of them, if you are a marmot.
- Marmot
- Marmot
- Posts in topic: 185
- Posts: 30973
- Joined: Sat Jan 11, 2014 11:21 am
- Location: Oregon
- Gender: Genderfluid
- Preferred Pronouns: they/them
- Aka: Marmot
- Contact:
Re: Day 4- BLUE vs. RED
But I do give you three players who have not been around today.
DrWilgy: Hasn't posted since the start of Night 3.
MacDougall: Hasn't posted since the beginning of Day 4.
TheFloyd73: Hasn't posted since Day 3.
DrWilgy: Hasn't posted since the start of Night 3.
MacDougall: Hasn't posted since the beginning of Day 4.
TheFloyd73: Hasn't posted since Day 3.
Banners and Stuff
Spoiler: show
Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Wed Dec 16, 2020 7:33 pm Just how many days of "let's yeet them tomorrow" can a mafioso survive?
The answer: all of them, if you are a marmot.
Re: Day 4- BLUE vs. RED
I'm only defending him in the sense that I am considering his motivations for posting what he has been posting (something he refuses to do for me, but oh well). Do you agree or disagree with what I've said about him above?Marmot wrote:Epignosis wrote:Which means no teammate has informed him of this fact.Marmot wrote:I don't know if he realizes that he has votes.Epignosis wrote:Moreover, notsawyer is taking three votes right from the get-go and his reaction to all this is to double down on his smear campaign:
I don't know if you're defending him or suggesting he has a teammate who hasn't been around today. Both are plausible.
Stream my music for free: https://epignosis.bandcamp.com/
- Marmot
- Marmot
- Posts in topic: 185
- Posts: 30973
- Joined: Sat Jan 11, 2014 11:21 am
- Location: Oregon
- Gender: Genderfluid
- Preferred Pronouns: they/them
- Aka: Marmot
- Contact:
Re: Day 4- BLUE vs. RED
Some people do have a tendency to fit evidence to a narrative. That's just how they play. I agree that notknowing notsawyer notreally knots my naughty read of him.
But you are not solely responsible for SVS being lynched. I deserve some of the blame for pointing players in that direction, even if I wasn't as vocal or convincing as you were. What I don't understand is why notsawyer has basically ignored my role in that lynch, and followed my suspicion of you. Not only that, but he interacted little with me when I was hounding you. I find that lack of engagement suspicious, especially since you are his top suspect.
But you are not solely responsible for SVS being lynched. I deserve some of the blame for pointing players in that direction, even if I wasn't as vocal or convincing as you were. What I don't understand is why notsawyer has basically ignored my role in that lynch, and followed my suspicion of you. Not only that, but he interacted little with me when I was hounding you. I find that lack of engagement suspicious, especially since you are his top suspect.
Banners and Stuff
Spoiler: show
Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Wed Dec 16, 2020 7:33 pm Just how many days of "let's yeet them tomorrow" can a mafioso survive?
The answer: all of them, if you are a marmot.
Re: Day 4- BLUE vs. RED
So if he's mafia, what's his strategy there?Marmot wrote:Some people do have a tendency to fit evidence to a narrative. That's just how they play. I agree that notknowing notsawyer notreally knots my naughty read of him.
But you are not solely responsible for SVS being lynched. I deserve some of the blame for pointing players in that direction, even if I wasn't as vocal or convincing as you were. What I don't understand is why notsawyer has basically ignored my role in that lynch, and followed my suspicion of you. Not only that, but he interacted little with me when I was hounding you. I find that lack of engagement suspicious, especially since you are his top suspect.
Stream my music for free: https://epignosis.bandcamp.com/
- DrWilgy
- Capo Regime (Street Boss)
- Posts in topic: 150
- Posts: 15184
- Joined: Thu Aug 13, 2015 10:54 am
Re: Day 4- BLUE vs. RED
Video games homieMarmot wrote:But I do give you three players who have not been around today.
DrWilgy: Hasn't posted since the start of Night 3.
MacDougall: Hasn't posted since the beginning of Day 4.
TheFloyd73: Hasn't posted since Day 3.
- Marmot
- Marmot
- Posts in topic: 185
- Posts: 30973
- Joined: Sat Jan 11, 2014 11:21 am
- Location: Oregon
- Gender: Genderfluid
- Preferred Pronouns: they/them
- Aka: Marmot
- Contact:
Re: Day 4- BLUE vs. RED
I believe it's easier to be sincere about one's own thoughts and ideas than it is to discuss those put forth by another person. One can inherently believe everything they say, but they (ideally) have to pick a side when looking at what someone else has to say.Epignosis wrote:So if he's mafia, what's his strategy there?Marmot wrote:Some people do have a tendency to fit evidence to a narrative. That's just how they play. I agree that notknowing notsawyer notreally knots my naughty read of him.
But you are not solely responsible for SVS being lynched. I deserve some of the blame for pointing players in that direction, even if I wasn't as vocal or convincing as you were. What I don't understand is why notsawyer has basically ignored my role in that lynch, and followed my suspicion of you. Not only that, but he interacted little with me when I was hounding you. I find that lack of engagement suspicious, especially since you are his top suspect.
I find my own theories more believable than those of others.
But I suppose this does not make notsawyer bad.
Banners and Stuff
Spoiler: show
Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Wed Dec 16, 2020 7:33 pm Just how many days of "let's yeet them tomorrow" can a mafioso survive?
The answer: all of them, if you are a marmot.