You're now.... mimicking Mac's take on Jack...Turnip Head wrote: ↑Sun Mar 08, 2020 10:48 pmI was wrong but my read looks and feels authentic, you even said so yourself earlier. It wasn't until Mac actually flipped that you've now started calling my reads "disingenuous" and considering my contributions to be "nothing". I will pull your quotes if I have to. I can see now that you were being opportunistic at the time when you called my read of him authentic, and you are being opportunistic again after his flip, calling my reads "disingenuous" and "nothing".JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Sun Mar 08, 2020 10:12 pm Turnip Head on MacDougall:
Spoiler: show
Gripes, starting with colored stuff:
Yellow: TH isn't merely defending Mac, they're telling us what Mac's instincts are. How should they know? That looks bogus to me.
Orange: TH's read on Mac is standout; the language they used and confidence they expressed were one of a kind in his posts. And there's close to nothing to justify that confidence. What follows is as much as there was:
Burnt orange: The read is heavily predicated upon Mac's flip of his nutella read. First of all, the entire premise that this is something mafia don't do is just balogna. Of course they do that. They do it all the time. Second, assigning that assessment to MacDougall of all people is additionally hard to believe. Mac is capable of just about anything, and one needn't play many games with him to determine that. Third, even if one accepts the premise that this was a "good look", it makes no sense to me for the look to be so good that Mac is rendered beyond reproach.
The read looks fake to me.
You're taking advantage of my reads
when
they
suit
your
agenda
You are Mac's actual teammate, I'm the unwitting pawn on your chessboard.
He hadn't flipped yet = turnip's reads look real and good
After Mac flips = I hate all of turnip's read, bullet point by bullet point
Search found 313 matches
Return to “Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [GAME OVER]”
- Sun Mar 08, 2020 10:49 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 8443
- Views: 269873
Re: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [Day 4]
- Sun Mar 08, 2020 10:56 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 8443
- Views: 269873
Re: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [Day 3]
Your shitting in his cornflakes ended as soon as the going got tough.JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Sun Mar 08, 2020 10:54 pmAs you saw in the quote you lol'd, I was favoring the lynch that I had more confidence in. You'll also see a wealth of me shitting in Mac's corn flakes at various other junctures to include when he was in line to be murdered instead of Radish (before the eventual lynching wagon overtook him late).Dom wrote: ↑Sun Mar 08, 2020 10:39 pmWhen I was the loudest voice against Mac where were you with this?JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Sun Mar 08, 2020 10:13 pmI also dislike this post in particular.Turnip Head wrote: ↑Tue Mar 03, 2020 8:18 am The case on Mac is top notch cringe mainly driven by Sig's woman scorned persona
Reducing suspicions of Mac to this is disingenuous.
- Sun Mar 08, 2020 10:59 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 8443
- Views: 269873
Re: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [Day 5]
[VOTE:
sig] aubergine
- Sun Mar 08, 2020 11:03 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 8443
- Views: 269873
Re: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [Day 5]
How am I to think you are genuine in your suspicion of turnip head?
- Sun Mar 08, 2020 11:07 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 8443
- Views: 269873
Re: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [Day 5]
...seems like you're buddying me tbh.
- Sun Mar 08, 2020 11:10 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 8443
- Views: 269873
Re: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [Day 5]
...uhh... I care?
- Sun Mar 08, 2020 11:14 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 8443
- Views: 269873
Re: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [Day 5]
...I'd like to have a nice discourse about Jay v Turnip.
They both sound yucky.
They both sound yucky.
- Sun Mar 08, 2020 11:17 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 8443
- Views: 269873
Re: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [Day 5]
Jay-- put Turnip and sig aside.
Who do we lynch?
Who do we lynch?
- Sun Mar 08, 2020 11:24 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 8443
- Views: 269873
Re: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [Day 5]
Expand
- Mon Mar 09, 2020 12:53 am
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 8443
- Views: 269873
Re: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [Day 5]
...what game are you trying to solve?JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Mon Mar 09, 2020 12:24 amI can't remember posts from him that made me feel like he is innocent. He has floated around and amounted to next to no production or memorable anything.
It isn't this one.
Thought you suspected speedchuck?
- Mon Mar 09, 2020 12:55 am
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 8443
- Views: 269873
Re: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [Day 5]
Since when have you known Jay to try this little, folks?
- Mon Mar 09, 2020 1:00 am
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 8443
- Views: 269873
Re: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [Day 5]
Oh is it?
Tell me, Sloonei, since when does Jay not have extremely detailed reasoning for his suspicions, eagerly share them, and want to solve games?
None of that is happening here?
- Mon Mar 09, 2020 1:00 am
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 8443
- Views: 269873
Re: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [Day 5]
So Sloonei-- I ask you--
sig is off the table.
Who is bad? Why?
sig is off the table.
Who is bad? Why?
- Mon Mar 09, 2020 1:03 am
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 8443
- Views: 269873
Re: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [Day 5]
I believe someone else in this game-- probably SVS-- stated that there is value in re-summarizing.JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Mon Mar 09, 2020 1:00 amI gave you a gut read on speedchuck. There's a whole set of analyses in my posts that can expand.
Click
You can shit on my work after you look at it.
Back your shit up.
- Mon Mar 09, 2020 1:05 am
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 8443
- Views: 269873
Re: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [Night 3]
So folks-- this is Jay's epic takedown of Speedchuck. Ready? I've removed the spoiler tags so you can be FORCED to dine on its glory.
This sums to: "I dunno. Seems possible"
That's Jay's second most favored lynch in this game.
Does that seem off to you, folks?
One paragraph and a line in yellow.JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Thu Mar 05, 2020 6:32 pm speedchuck
speedchuck wrote: ↑Thu Feb 27, 2020 12:33 pmThat said nutella does get a lot more emotional after Mac turns on her. I see why she has votes.juliets wrote: ↑Thu Feb 27, 2020 12:29 pmOk speed thanks for the clarification.speedchuck wrote: ↑Thu Feb 27, 2020 12:19 pmNah, I'm talking about APPEAL to emotion. The idea of 'OMG how could you do this please lynch this person and not me because I'll feel just so awful if you lynch me uwu'
I hate appeal to emotion and it's lost several games to scum on this site.speedchuck wrote: ↑Thu Feb 27, 2020 2:50 pm Upon further reflection of ISOs both of these wagons are shiiiiiiiiiiiny turds.
Nutella I can see why people suspect her. The interactions starting when Mac wagoned on look pretty bad. But lynching nutella D1 after she gets defensive over some tunneling is wonky.
I have no idea why anyone would vote Master Radishes.speedchuck wrote: ↑Sun Mar 01, 2020 3:42 pmI got weird vibes from Ted D1, and then he appeared reluctant to address Dizzy's 'scumslip' on him. It wasn't the slip itself that bothered me, but his forced nonchalance about it? Something like that. Lol at her flipping votes, though.Sloonei wrote: ↑Sun Mar 01, 2020 3:38 pmExpand on this, mr chuckspeedchuck wrote: ↑Sun Mar 01, 2020 3:37 pm Having read over the last two pages, Dys and Dom are my top townreads. Their votes are on people I would like to see lynched.
I got twenty minutes. Lets go.
The Mac read is nothing special. I agree with what Jay said about his Dom post, and a few other sentiments expressed in the past two pages.
Dizzy and Dom both seemed like fairly stable, level heads in the thread D1. I like town dizzy and town dom.
Bonus: I don't care to lynch G-man.speedchuck wrote: ↑Sun Mar 01, 2020 4:24 pmwow okay that sounds good [VOTE: Macdougall] aubergineNANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME wrote: ↑Sun Mar 01, 2020 4:11 pmHey you should vote macspeedchuck wrote: ↑Sun Mar 01, 2020 4:09 pm [VOTE: Ted] aubergine
I could be persuaded to vote Mac pretty easily.speedchuck wrote: ↑Tue Mar 03, 2020 12:28 pmSounds pretty non-subtle as flip-flops go. Do you think scum mac would be subtle or no?Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Tue Mar 03, 2020 11:39 am I 100% disagree about that progression.
Jack was sure Nutella was scum and said so loudly.
Mac said Nutella was town and Jack was scum with basically no explanation.
Then, after nothing changed between Jack and Nutella, Mac adopted the idea that Jack is always right about Nutella and therefore she is bad and if she’s not, whatever. An excuse to pretend that makes Jack scum.
The not tiny part would be an understandable opinion to have if he started with it or he developed it. That didn’t happen. That opinion appears to have spontaneously generated. More likely, Mac saw a way to shade two players who had each accumulated 6ish votes at some point during the day, hoping for a one two lynch and lynch of players not on his team.
It’s worse than no progression. There’s agenda in it.speedchuck wrote: ↑Tue Mar 03, 2020 1:02 pm I would, right now, vote sig, TH, Mac, and anyone who has appealed to emotion. I would murder the emotion right out of this game.speedchuck wrote: ↑Tue Mar 03, 2020 1:06 pmNot sure.
I mean, Sig apparently told him to do so this game. So we should lynch Sig for suggesting it as well.speedchuck wrote: ↑Tue Mar 03, 2020 1:10 pm So we can start with him.
But I have a hit list, and I'm considering putting you on it.
[VOTE: Macdougall] auberginespeedchuck wrote: ↑Tue Mar 03, 2020 2:53 pmOh, right, Multiball.NANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME wrote: ↑Tue Mar 03, 2020 2:52 pmYes. Multiball.speedchuck wrote: ↑Tue Mar 03, 2020 2:51 pm. . .NANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME wrote: ↑Tue Mar 03, 2020 2:49 pm I also think anyone hard pushing the “mac has given up, lol gottem” line should be under a close microscope tomorrow
You're talking about even if Mac is scum, right?
And here I almost sorta agree with you.speedchuck wrote: ↑Tue Mar 03, 2020 4:16 pmLiterally first I've heard of this.
(but if he is don't you think we should lynch Mac first? :P)speedchuck wrote: ↑Tue Mar 03, 2020 4:32 pm I can [VOTE: Sig] aubergine for sure, with Mac on the back burner.speedchuck wrote: ↑Tue Mar 03, 2020 8:26 pmHave you ever been in scumchat with me?MacDougall wrote: ↑Tue Mar 03, 2020 8:20 pmI think the lack of speedchuck's content is a large part of it. I am used to him being a more prominent member of the town. I think that with players like speedchuck sometimes basic is the best way to read them. If he is not living up to the normal standards of contribution then it's probably because he has a non town agenda/is putting a lot of his content elsewhere (ie. scum chat).juliets wrote: ↑Tue Mar 03, 2020 8:17 pmMac can you talk about speedchuck? Is it that he isn't posting frequently or something else/combination of things?MacDougall wrote: ↑Tue Mar 03, 2020 8:13 pmA great deal of people. The constant focus on myself (and now Sig) is very much allowing for a game environment where people who are absolutely failing in their basic civilian duty, or not living up to their usual standards are receiving little to no pressure. I have reservations about all the below;
Epignosis - Does not appear to be earnestly attempting to achieve a civilian wincon.
ColinIsCool - Only appears to be trying when there is pressure on him.
Michelle - Does not match her meta. Hasn't helped the civ cause really at all.
speedchuck - Does not appear to be the same speedchuck that I am used to seeing.
sprityo - Appears to be totally laying low outside of intermittently FPS reading me scum.
Tranq - Has literally made 5 posts or something.
How chatty am I in scumchat, Mac?
linki: my 'extra content' is going into audio editing, yeah. That's not an excuse, so feel free to suspect me and put attention my way. But it's also an unfortunate truth to work around. Binding freelance contracts are more pressing than mafia.speedchuck wrote: ↑Wed Mar 04, 2020 11:29 amI thought the Sig case was more predicated on his knowledge of the nightkill, not of the alignment he supposed for Mac. That would make Sig's slip irrelevant to Mac's alignment, if his team just got it wrong?Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Wed Mar 04, 2020 10:23 amIt is. It’s just the kind of math townies don’t like to listen to, along with logic like “even if I am scum....”
Townies generally want to vote for the player they suspect the most, which is Sig, not the player who is most likely to flip mafia, which is Mac.
It doesn’t really matter because we’re probably lynching them both and they’re probably both flipping mafia but
Tony’s logic is sound.
Lynch Sig and he flips wolf -> lynch Mac
Lynch Sig and he flips town -> lynch Mac
Lynch Mac and he flips bulletproof wolf -> lynch Sig
Lynch Mac and he flips town -> a decent chunk of the Sig case falls away -> maybe don’t lynch Sig.
Logically, mathematically, that makes Mac the best lynch.
Realistically, people suspect Sig the most and Sig will be lynched today. That’s of course fine because there’s good reason for that suspicion. We just need to follow up on Mac tomorrow, especially because he’ll have three teammates running interference and I’m betting we’ll see some new cases starting up on townies tomorrow.
Or did I miss case development overnight?speedchuck wrote: ↑Wed Mar 04, 2020 11:44 amBut there's only one part of that he CAN know, right? Surely there are town roles that can stop a kill?Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Wed Mar 04, 2020 11:41 am His knowledge of the nightkill is “I think the mafia shot Mac and he’s the bulletproof guy in the Master mafia.”
So if we’re to read “I think” as “I know” then the chances of Mac also being scum skyrockets.
...
But nobody would have protected Mac. Oh. Lol.
Yeah I could lynch Mac first. [VOTE: Mac] auberginespeedchuck wrote: ↑Wed Mar 04, 2020 12:29 pm I've had a suspicion of Sig since D1, before the whole slip biz. I really don't care much whether he or Mac get sacked first.speedchuck wrote: ↑Wed Mar 04, 2020 8:24 pmWhat happened to macSloonei wrote: ↑Wed Mar 04, 2020 8:23 pmYesspeedchuck wrote: ↑Wed Mar 04, 2020 8:30 pmYou never responded to my addressing your accusation earlier.
Am I active in scumchat, Mac?
The meat of this stuff is Day 3, starting with the post I highlighted (just as a marker). speed went back and forth between Mac and sig. I believe he voted each of them twice; he ended on sig and didn't appear to call the vote. I note that his willingness to wield those votes was based primarily upon the comparative "value" or validity of lynching either Mac or sig first relative to the other, with less emphasis upon what made them suspicious -- particularly with Mac. That's not my favorite thing. I am not prepared to dissociate them.
Compatibility: Decent
This sums to: "I dunno. Seems possible"
That's Jay's second most favored lynch in this game.
Does that seem off to you, folks?
- Mon Mar 09, 2020 1:06 am
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 8443
- Views: 269873
Re: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [Day 5]
Sounds like you have a suspect that isn't speedchuck.JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Mon Mar 09, 2020 1:06 amBecause I am fairly certain there is at least one bullshitter trying to ply her as a suspect.Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Mon Mar 09, 2020 1:05 amWhy do you give a shit about this?JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Mon Mar 09, 2020 1:04 am General question for everyone in this game:
If you find juliets suspicious, why do you find juliets suspicious?
- Mon Mar 09, 2020 1:08 am
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 8443
- Views: 269873
Re: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [Day 5]
Hey turnip-- is that all it took? Jack asking you to literally back up anything you say?
Are you gonna ignore this post too?
Are you gonna ignore this post too?
- Mon Mar 09, 2020 1:09 am
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 8443
- Views: 269873
Re: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [Day 5]
Sloonei wrote: ↑Mon Mar 09, 2020 1:07 amI can answer this for Jay. I won't. But I can.Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Mon Mar 09, 2020 1:05 amWhy do you give a shit about this?JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Mon Mar 09, 2020 1:04 am General question for everyone in this game:
If you find juliets suspicious, why do you find juliets suspicious?
- Mon Mar 09, 2020 1:15 am
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 8443
- Views: 269873
Re: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [Day 5]
You're hinting at something hear that I do not buy.Sloonei wrote: ↑Mon Mar 09, 2020 1:11 amYou object to Sloonei expressing the opinion that there is value in asking people questions?Dom wrote: ↑Mon Mar 09, 2020 1:09 amSloonei wrote: ↑Mon Mar 09, 2020 1:07 amI can answer this for Jay. I won't. But I can.Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Mon Mar 09, 2020 1:05 amWhy do you give a shit about this?JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Mon Mar 09, 2020 1:04 am General question for everyone in this game:
If you find juliets suspicious, why do you find juliets suspicious?
- Mon Mar 09, 2020 1:17 am
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 8443
- Views: 269873
Re: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [Day 5]
Jay-- more than anyone-- knows that asking for people to restate their opinions is an excelelnt way to catch a baddie.
Didn't expect the snark from a civ Jay.
Didn't expect the snark from a civ Jay.
- Mon Mar 09, 2020 5:32 am
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 8443
- Views: 269873
Re: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [Day 5]
THTonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Mon Mar 09, 2020 1:35 am Who is on Mac’s team?
Everybody. One or two names only. No reasoning allowed. We all have generally good instincts here, who’s given you bad vibes?
??
OR
JJJ
Sloonei
maybe?
- Mon Mar 09, 2020 5:46 am
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 8443
- Views: 269873
- Mon Mar 09, 2020 5:49 am
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 8443
- Views: 269873
Re: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [Day 5]
oh ted is probably bad too, right? wasn't he the one that floated that sprit had checked him?
- Mon Mar 09, 2020 8:24 am
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 8443
- Views: 269873
Re: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [Day 5]
...because there's a baddie who shows up as civ on a check.
Yikes, man.
- Mon Mar 09, 2020 8:25 am
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 8443
- Views: 269873
Re: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [Day 5]
"Look at me! I am civ, the alignment checker said as much."
*alignment checker denies*
*there is a baddie role that shows up as civ on a role check*
:hmmm:
*alignment checker denies*
*there is a baddie role that shows up as civ on a role check*
:hmmm:
- Mon Mar 09, 2020 8:57 am
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 8443
- Views: 269873
- Mon Mar 09, 2020 9:00 am
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 8443
- Views: 269873
Re: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [Day 5]
Wait... there's still someone else on sig's team right?
- Mon Mar 09, 2020 12:12 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 8443
- Views: 269873
Re: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [Day 5]
Am I overreacting or making a point????
- Mon Mar 09, 2020 3:11 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 8443
- Views: 269873
- Mon Mar 09, 2020 3:11 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 8443
- Views: 269873
Re: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [Day 5]
People who say the names of logical fallacies to no end tend to be bad.
- Mon Mar 09, 2020 3:14 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 8443
- Views: 269873
Re: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [Day 5]
I'm not talking about you lol
the incorrect "you're" is killing me.
- Mon Mar 09, 2020 3:24 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 8443
- Views: 269873
Re: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [Day 5]
why is tony voting for nanook?
- Mon Mar 09, 2020 6:53 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 8443
- Views: 269873
Re: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [Roles]
Question:JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Mon Mar 09, 2020 5:46 pmIf this happens I recommend nutella.Long Con wrote: ↑Mon Feb 24, 2020 10:49 pm
The Monitor - You cannot be nightkilled by regular means. By the end of Day 1, you will choose two players to be Harbinger and Pariah. They will know who you are.
If Harbinger is alive, and has not been found by the Anti-Monitor at the start of Day 6, she will choose one player to resurrect.
If they rez SVS and she then dies again later-- do we get another role?
- Mon Mar 09, 2020 7:05 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 8443
- Views: 269873
Re: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [Day 5]
....Turnip Head mind melded with a baddie but not his other civ reads...
Why?
Why?
- Mon Mar 09, 2020 7:11 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 8443
- Views: 269873
Re: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [Day 5]
You're certainly not capable of mindmelding with people you don't engage with.
- Mon Mar 09, 2020 7:12 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 8443
- Views: 269873
- Mon Mar 09, 2020 7:13 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 8443
- Views: 269873
Re: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [Day 5]
TH is playing in bad faith.Turnip Head wrote: ↑Mon Mar 09, 2020 7:09 pmI've lost some faith in my reads so I'm resetting a bit. Almost anyone could be bad and I'd say they've played well, but I can also find reasons to trust most players
Does this make him bad?
- Mon Mar 09, 2020 9:45 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 8443
- Views: 269873
Re: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [Roles]
Then the Monitor, who I think is alive, can go ballistic.Epignosis wrote: ↑Mon Mar 09, 2020 8:38 pmSuppose the Harbinger is mafia.JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Mon Mar 09, 2020 5:46 pmIf this happens I recommend nutella.Long Con wrote: ↑Mon Feb 24, 2020 10:49 pm
The Monitor - You cannot be nightkilled by regular means. By the end of Day 1, you will choose two players to be Harbinger and Pariah. They will know who you are.
If Harbinger is alive, and has not been found by the Anti-Monitor at the start of Day 6, she will choose one player to resurrect.
I doubt this is true.TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Mon Mar 09, 2020 9:08 pm Dizzy is the monitor, known by a mafia member harbinger and killed and janitored day 2 for precisely that purpose
- Mon Mar 09, 2020 9:52 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 8443
- Views: 269873
Re: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [Day 5]
remind me who you voted forJaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Mon Mar 09, 2020 9:50 pmKnowing this website, I think that's entirely believable -- one or even zero on sig. I would bet considerable bucks that at least one Mac teammate voted FOR Mac, and perhaps more than that.Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Mon Mar 09, 2020 9:43 pm Aside from Colin, you are townreading the entire Sig wagon?
You think when Sig was damn near buried and a metric fuckton of players collectively shrugged at the Mac case and voted Sig, that no wolves were among those players except maybe Colin?
Cause Mac had 3 teammates. I think there was more than one wolf who voted Sig. Is have an easier time believing three wolves on that wagon than one.
This is The Syndicate.
- Mon Mar 09, 2020 10:00 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 8443
- Views: 269873
Re: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [Day 5]
Jack, I'm fairly sure you're wrong about juliets.
- Mon Mar 09, 2020 10:02 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 8443
- Views: 269873
Re: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [Day 5]
I agree with that.
- Mon Mar 09, 2020 10:08 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 8443
- Views: 269873
Re: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [Day 5]
[mention]tedxtr[/mention]
You voted G-Man day 2.
What's up with that?
You voted G-Man day 2.
What's up with that?
- Mon Mar 09, 2020 10:25 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 8443
- Views: 269873
Re: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [Night 2]
I'm browsing the thread again and this is a good post.Epignosis wrote: ↑Fri Mar 06, 2020 11:16 pm Nanook doesn't meaningfully engage with sig until Night 2:
While this gets a playful tongue face, it's worth remembering that Nanook had a different role Day 1.NANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME wrote: ↑Mon Mar 02, 2020 9:39 amUh listening to you D1 wouldve TKed me, so....passsig wrote: ↑Mon Mar 02, 2020 9:08 amYea maybe listen to sigs wild theories next time and we could've lynched scum day 1.TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Mon Mar 02, 2020 1:52 am A question: if we all know what a derp looks like, and we all could reasonably emulate it, why don’t you see it more often? I can’t remember the last time scum town cleated themself with something like that.
The only possible example in this game is Sig going after Radish for saying baddie. Sig might have been right. Ironically, because he might have been right, I need to re-examine Sig.
These are two independent trains of thought regardless.NANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME wrote: ↑Mon Mar 02, 2020 10:40 pm To be clear I don’t super care about sig’s theory, but nothing between yesterday and today made me think “oh mac isn’t mafia”
I don't get this. "To be clear" (again, because Nanook must be aware that in some respect he isn't being clear), Mac should die but not "today." Which team were you prioritizing and why? And why were prioritizing teams?NANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME wrote: ↑Mon Mar 02, 2020 10:46 pm To be clear I support a Mac TK and still think he’s >rand scum
Just don’t think he’s scum on the team I’m prioritizing today
SVS and tranq are also votes I’m happy with. Maybe even Dom, though he seems kinda different than what I remember from being his teammate.
And is that "player salad" I detect? "Mac is bad, but Mac isn't on the team I want to lynch, but maybe lynch Dom."
Folks, this is mafia.
This is making excuses for sig instead of making sig explain himself.NANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME wrote: ↑Tue Mar 03, 2020 1:09 am I mean I guess if I squint I can see sig making a bad “slip” read to get pushback (thus discouraging cases against radish) then tying me and radish together and pushing me over him based on me defending him...
Idk I guess I could see it as a stretch but I would TK so many people over him today
"There are at minimum 4 better choices (shrug)" (but I'm not going to name any of them).NANOOKTHEGREATANDFEARSOME wrote: ↑Tue Mar 03, 2020 1:14 am Uh sig isn’t gonna die today, lol. There are at minimum 4 better choices
And I’m saying that as someone who had him as my second blow up choice lol
++++
I'm stopping there.
Lynch Nanook.
- Mon Mar 09, 2020 10:26 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 8443
- Views: 269873
Re: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [Day 5]
uhh.... you?JaggedJimmyJay wrote: ↑Mon Mar 09, 2020 10:20 pm Something comes to mind. In a world where people want to save Mac, the Day 2 lynch is the more interesting one. Mac led by at least three votes late before he was overtaken by a quick Radish push. I’ll look at it later.
i'm bored with this take.speedchuck wrote: ↑Mon Mar 09, 2020 10:22 pm I scumread everyone with a vote right now. Ahhhhhh multiball.
- Mon Mar 09, 2020 10:42 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 8443
- Views: 269873
Re: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [Day 5]
I mix it up.
[VOTE: Jay] aubergine
[VOTE: Jay] aubergine
- Mon Mar 09, 2020 10:51 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 8443
- Views: 269873
Re: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [Day 5]
[mention]G-Man[/mention]
What's your headspace?
What's your headspace?
- Mon Mar 09, 2020 10:54 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 8443
- Views: 269873
- Mon Mar 09, 2020 11:10 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 8443
- Views: 269873
Re: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [Day 5]
I may have missed it. You weren't in my thread, were you? Has it been posted in here?G-Man wrote: ↑Mon Mar 09, 2020 11:05 pmOutside of Day 4, I am still trying to tread water. I’ve been trying to catch up, but today of all days has made that difficult. I feel like the colorized vote post that I made and my reflections on our Day 4 mini-thread were overlooked at best because my name isn’t Jay, Sloonei, Jack, Ted, or Nanook.
- Mon Mar 09, 2020 11:11 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 8443
- Views: 269873
Re: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [Day 5]
I have felt overlooked at times, too G.
- Mon Mar 09, 2020 11:22 pm
- Forum: Previous Sit Downs
- Topic: Champions 2019 - Crisis on The Syndicate [GAME OVER]
- Replies: 8443
- Views: 269873