The Syndicate

I have faith in you rico.

MovingPictures07 wrote:

Golden wrote:Rico is going to be permanently ahead of me in no time at all. But my 4/6 was nice while it lasted.

How do you figure?

Rico is way more competitive than me.

Metalmarsh89 wrote:

MovingPictures07 wrote:Your messages were inspired, G-Man. Not sure how I couldn't tell they were from you earlier!

Awesome stuff, as always, Rico.

Hey, so now both Rico and Golden are at a win % of 57.14% (4 out of 7 games), right behind Nevinera's 63.64%.

Here's a little fun fact. I am the only person on the Syndicate to be lynched on Day 1 and still win in a game (Biblical Mafia).

Technically Golden did the same in Economics, but he replaced back in to a different role.

Here is a fun fact. Technically MM is the only person to do something that technically I also did.

What about DF in the flash. Was he NKed night one?

Rico is going to be permanently ahead of me in no time at all. But my 4/6 was nice while it lasted.

DharmaHelper wrote:

Golden wrote:

DharmaHelper wrote:

Golden wrote:

DharmaHelper wrote:

-- Whether DH used any abilities in the two nights he was alive (and what and on whom)

4-Person poll thingy and protection on myself, I think.

You are to blame for my lynch?

In fairness, your vote was sketchy.

In fairness - you created a poll in which I was virtually a guaranteed lynch with no information except one sketchy vote...

And I was a cop.

My bad.

It was pretty funny, in a way. And somehow I still nearly managed to survive (thanks MM!)

And frankly, I don't think my presence would have been enough to catch russti.

DharmaHelper wrote:

Golden wrote:

DharmaHelper wrote:

-- Whether DH used any abilities in the two nights he was alive (and what and on whom)

4-Person poll thingy and protection on myself, I think.

You are to blame for my lynch?

In fairness, your vote was sketchy.

In fairness - you created a poll in which I was virtually a guaranteed lynch with no information except one sketchy vote...

And I was a cop.

DharmaHelper wrote:

-- Whether DH used any abilities in the two nights he was alive (and what and on whom)

4-Person poll thingy and protection on myself, I think.

You are to blame for my lynch?

I figured Ninja was silk spectre. So did everyone else, I guess.

Yeah, the elo lynch was so wonky from an external perspective. So was the MP lynch. There were a couple of times in this game where I so wanted to be in the thread. I don't really know how cookie and espers managed to last quite as long as they did.

I knew Russ was the guy who should be lynched when I was

In all seriousness though, if I was in this lylo my order would have probably been DDL, rico, made, russ.

Well played guys.

juliets wrote:I am reading DDL at the moment - could someone tell me what "fluffing" means?

Boy, did this take me straight back to high school. The 14 year old in me just did a little dance of glee.

timmer wrote:Many thanks, Epi and Juliets. Sorry guys, I should never have signed up!

He even posts in blue.

Timme, never lose the sadness avatar, it's epic.

Dragon D. Luffy wrote:Also, I love how you all call the vigilante a ninja, when ninja is traditionally a completely different role.

Ninja blooper is literally actually a vigilante. Real life stories here at RM.

The delay makes me wonder if it is an individual person who breaks the tie.

Can't wait to hear MP's thoughts, I don't think he would have voted for me.

And I think llama may have been the comedian. It's why he went all supatown.

Also, I hate voting for MM when he self-voted, but sometimes thats just what you have to do.

I seriously considered voting myself just to put some of the people in my lynch train on rohrshachs list. I think they wanted me to be the easy vote, some of them.

I wouldn't tunnel on DDL, its not like I have info, but I'd really look at him very hard - challenge him, people!

Just in case...

My rainbow

Quite suspect

DDL - please everyone look at the approach he has taken to me. I don't think it's sincere.
Cookie - Might just be struggling with a game in which everyone is active. Could also be struggling with being bad? Not sure how often she has been bad?
Timmer - Deborah. Need I say more

Slightly pingy

espers - only because he claimed he didn't get what MM got
MM - because he claimed to get something and noone else has (didn't think about this earlier, but it makes me more comfortable with an MM vote)
Lorab - wasn't a fan of her bringing up lie detector about the G-Man thing
DH - because of his lack of much of anything

neutral

Russti - haven't seen much here yet
Rico - enigma

Slightly town

Bass - feeling good about him
MP - has done some random things, but overall feels like civ MP to me
Ninja - despite my early reservations, since then I've liked what I've seen
G-Man - I think his effort to comment on everything as he catched up is sincere and good town work
LC - overall feeling decent about him so far.

quite a bit town

Elo - I'm liking her this game

There'es still russti, rico, espers...

I'm hoping at least one of them might come along and believe me.

In fact, looking at the role derf, I think it's pretty clear MP can't vote.

I fell MP would probably have voted by now so I'm assuming his silence comes with an inability to vote?

LoRab wrote:A sock, a rabbi, and a golden (whatever a golden is) walk into a mafia vote...

you coulda gone with kiwi.

At this point it looks probable that my vote is going to be for MM. You never know what happens, I guess.

That makes sense Ninja. That interpretation hadn't occurred to me.

I mean that as a legitimate question to - like, is it colouring your vision.

LoRab wrote:Golden's use of the "I'm a very important civ" defense may have earned him my vote. Because, in my experience, civs don't usually use that defense.

In my experience, I don't often use that defence.

But in this case, it's true.

Are you sure I'm not earning your vote because I keep reminding people I suspect you?

nijuukyugou wrote: Golden, you said he was the only person you'd use as a self-preservation vote because you have slight suspicion of him - why? I'm not seeing it.

Because he said he found himself suspicious, which I found odd. Reminds me of Vomps being Uzziah in Biblical.

But I'll put my self-defence vote wherever it will help me best - he is just my preference.

Oh, yes, I get what you mean now.

G-Man wrote:Taking the easy way out and voting for Russ. His vote for me Day 1 was crap and I don't want to be on Rorschach's hit list if we lynch a civ today.

Golden's recent posts are not very becoming of him and yet it also doesn't quite feel like baddie Golden. After getting schooled by him in Econ and Guess Who, this kind of stumble-fumble collapse doesn't feel right. Could just be an off game.

No real suspicion of Log Con yet and I am still a neutral read on MM.

Why is it an off game? I don't think there has been any stumble or fumble or collapse in my game.

Unless people want to hold me to a higher standard - the kind of standard in which being busy at work isn't actually allowed, and I have to be fully up to speed with the thread at all times. Which is, frankly, unreasonable.

The idea that I wouldn't be honest about exactly how my vote comes about is daft, because I hold a very public view that lying about stuff you don't need to lie about is the height of stupidity as a mafia, and that I always do my best to do exactly what I would do as a civilian. I don't do elaborate set ups like what I've been accused of. It reminds me of when I played in RYM86, which I'm not sure anyone else is around who was playing in that one, but I basically got lynched for being honest about stuff around the vote too.

I'm glad there is someone who voted russti. He would be my preference for a self-defence vote. He is the only person on there I have any slight suspicion of at all.

Dragon D. Luffy wrote:

Golden wrote:

Dragon D. Luffy wrote:Oh ffs Golden, you are better than this.

No, I really think people should lynch you tomorrow.

That's what legacy posts are for, dude. Worried about it because you already know I'm not flipping mafia?

What is even the point of this question?

Of course I'm worried, I can't know for sure if you are mafia, and like anyone else I should avoid being lynched.

Golden wrote:

Dragon D. Luffy wrote:I'm not going to bad tonight knowing I let a possible mafioso live because I didn't believe he would be that obvious.

Stuff like this DDL.

Everyone is a 'possible mafioso'.

Wordplay. I explained why I suspect you at least twice already. You are more suspicious to me than "everyone".

DDL, I don't believe a word you are saying.

If I am lynched today, I suggest everyone takes a long hard look at you tomorrow.

You are primarily worried about me painting you as bad. If you think I am bad, why are you worried? You seem to be overreacting to my suspicion, convinced that you need to defend yourself against the guy who appears to be going down and who you are convinced enough is bad to have been the one person today absolutely sure that your vote could go no other way and that it was worth voting for me so early even though you'd be around.

Honestly, I think your posts today betray that you feel the need to make a pre-emptive defence against my flip, your posts read to me like you already know I'm not bad.

G-Man wrote:I owe MP an apology- he did not bring up the STV-era LD stuff. Golden did. Sorry MP. I still am not a fan of you this game but I must admit that I wrongly accused you of culling up the STV-era LD stuff. It does make me wonder a tad more about Golden though. He brought it up but then backed off of it when others continued on with the subject.

This is incorrect. LoRab brought it up. All I did was suspect LoRab for it, and defend you from accusations of writing your post around it.

Dragon D. Luffy wrote:I'm not going to bad tonight knowing I let a possible mafioso live because I didn't believe he would be that obvious.

Stuff like this DDL.

Everyone is a 'possible mafioso'.

Dragon D. Luffy wrote:Oh ffs Golden, you are better than this.

No, I really think people should lynch you tomorrow.

That's what legacy posts are for, dude. Worried about it because you already know I'm not flipping mafia?

Cookie, I often post my thoughts as I catch up. If someone else has already discussed it, oh well. But I'll have forgotten them by the time I've caught up, so it's better just to do it as I read it. No-one will mind. It's up to you, really, how you want to go about it.

Oh, I forgot G-Man hadn't caught up yet. OK, I take my comment about G-Man back.

But LC is the one I blame the least. You could call his vote self-defensive in the circumstances.

Don't forget these names...

Timmer, Long Con, Cookie, DDL

They are the people who voted before I even came back to the thread.

But of course, as I think everyone knows - I wouldn't have tied it up anyway. Nothing in econ or guess who would lead anyone to believe that would be true.

Which is why you should be treating the bandwagon landslide that is against me hours before the poll should be looked on as being shady as all heck.

FFS G-Man it does not feel calculated to you nor should it to you or anyone else.

When everyone knows that I DO NOT LIE ABOUT THINGS LIKE THAT

To lie about and calculate things like that is honestly stupid. Anyone who does it should be lined up against the mafia wall of shame and shot because it is not an effective tactic as mafia, it would be the stupidest thing you could do as mafia.

If I was mafia and knew I was tying up a vote, I would own it. It's the only way you can spin it to look good later.