The Syndicate

DFaraday wrote:Also, our team had the absolute worst luck. I recruited an inactive, then Nero was lynched right off the bat, THEN my first kill failed. This just wasn't the Maronis' game.

Yah man, you got the shit end of the stick on that one. You hung in there, though, and did your best!

Yay! My first real win on this site!!! it only took 10 months

I can't wait for an actual banner!!

Couldn't have done it without such a great civ team behind me. In hindsight, I'm glad I got killed when I did because I was never (knowingly) night targeted by any inmate including the joker. So that's nice.

I figured TH might have been Batman, and I'm glad I called DFaraday though I should have hit that case home. He was just so calm and collected in his defense I felt iffy. And Dom, I KNEW you weren't a civ from the beginning when you started jumping on me, but I figured maybe you were an inmate up until the end.

Thanks for an awesome game, Epi. I really wish I could have made a connection with Batman so that my messages weren't just air-filled anus cakes of info.

Scotty wrote:
Prisoner 208986 wrote:
MacDougall wrote:Dude I don't want to be sucked back in. I want to die so I can leave the game. Do yo thing.
Wait, what? Why do you want to leave the game? I would hate to see that happen, you're very entertaining.
Umm.

sorry, fixed

Prisoner 208986 wrote:
MacDougall wrote:Dude I don't want to be sucked back in. I want to die so I can leave the game. Do yo thing.
Wait, what? Why do you want to leave the game? I would hate to see that happen, you're very entertaining.

Umm.

oops I'm about 8 pages behind.

Also I'm dead. Rezz pls.

Thanks for the fun game, Epi/LC!

MacDougall wrote:
Scotty wrote:Awesome result! You know what's most comforting about that lynch?

If you all had just voted with me for a non-poster on day 1 in lovedelic, we could have usurped that role sooner, and not had a cop recruited. lol

Why wouldn't the cop have been recruited?

Whoop. Never mind, I read the wrong role. Forget I said that.
My point still stands though.

Awesome result! You know what's most comforting about that lynch?

If you all had just voted with me for a non-poster on day 1 in lovedelic, we could have usurped that role sooner, and not had a cop recruited. lol

Golden wrote:
Turnip Head wrote:
Golden wrote:I really wouldn't object to a low/non-poster vote at this point. I remember in Bullets Over Broadway how much trouble that was giving the civilians in the end, having all these people still alive who weren't even there. With Equivocate, ekeknat, Bubbles, Bass and Floyd all being non-contributory, that number is high.
Chrysanthemums tawdrier maid nag.
I understand, but I mean how do we deal with them? In Bullets Over Broadway they were a significant nuisance. Maybe we should just hound people to be subs?

That is true.
For now, sabie's giving us a good reason to vote her, and I will be with limited service up until eod so I am voting her.
then we can look at other low posters. We do need to start thinning the herd, but I don't think the time is right yet. When Mafia stop killing or we have almost as many no-shows as contributors- that's when I think we'll need to shave off the stubble.

sprityo wrote:Linki: I was getting to that-

I would vote myself or any of Floyd/equivocate/bubbles. I see Sabie is sorta around, but she would be another vote I would consider

In all honesty, j could save myself some trouble and vote myself

What the bajeebus is this.

The only role that would like to be lynched is Ras.
Unless you were Scarecrow'd to kill yourself. If that's the case, then you're probably not a rando cop #7 because that's a silly target to have.

I'm not going back through the woods, Hansel. It got me nowhere with Macintosh. My vote is with you or sabie, cause I just don't have time to play these parlor games.

Dammit phone. Gun to head, not gun to dad. Don't drive and drive, kids.

Dom wrote:
Scotty wrote: Dom, I understand you've outlined somewhere why you're suspicious of MP and to a lesser extent [now?] me, but what does MP have to lose in coming out about the strategy? I think he laid it out quite wholly. I understand never fully trusting in this game, but come on man. I'm just more surprised that I didn't die last night.
....I have said like 5 times now that I'm not looking to lynch MP

Ok, so why even bring up that you don't trust him? It's like saying you think the crazy cat lady next door keeps stealing your potted plants while you're at work but you won't confront her and make her stop.
This might just be one of those things that I won't be able to understand between us this game, Dom. One of the many accruing seeds of misunderstanding that I feel might be sown into a tree of suspicion as the game rains on.

@sprityo Welcome back. Gun to dad, who would you vote for right now?

Linki: I'm not worried she isn't. It will be her undoing if she is bad.

Woohoo press conference!

Well that helps set up the logic puzzle. Only thing is, unless we share in thread our clues, we're most likely at a disadvantage in getting that prize over the mafia, who can spread out and share. With only 5 unique locations and hints, my logic grid is very empty with the info I have. I only hope that the mafia don't have their shit together.

On the flip side of the coin, I've seen sabie lurking a couple times in this thread, and has made no effort to defend herself or answer questions posed to her. At least acknowledge that you're aware, sabie! I am very much leaning to voting her today.

Dom, I understand you've outlined somewhere why you're suspicious of MP and to a lesser extent [now?] me, but what does MP have to lose in coming out about the strategy? I think he laid it out quite wholly. I understand never fully trusting in this game, but come on man. I'm just more surprised that I didn't die last night.

I'm still in the mind that Gordon doesn't know shit and would love to hear from him otherwise, and will be staying out of the juliets/DH drama. I think juliets did give a good response, and I think that DH also laid out good arguments. I laughed, I cried, I looked at old yearbook photos. I'm a shell of my former self.

The continuing disappearance of posters is making my hands sweat, because this is hunting season for mafia to start taking out the people that are still alive and kicking. My fear is that by Day 15 (should we not have hanged all the mafia by then, god help us), there will just be Casper the Ghost and my 5-years-dead grandmother duking it out for the civs. No me gusta.

Dom wrote:
Scotty wrote:Sorry to butt in to this domestic despute, but TheFloyd logged in today. Still hasn't posted in over a week.

We may never get a response from sprityo. How long do we wait?
What do you mean, Scotty?
Why wouldn't we get a response?

We've waited this long. Who knows who is comin back in this game.

Also why are you suspicious of me still???

Sorry to butt in to this domestic despute, but TheFloyd logged in today. Still hasn't posted in over a week.

We may never get a response from sprityo. How long do we wait?

Matt wrote:
Scotty wrote:This also isn't damning or anything because it was two different teams, but I found slightly coincidental: the last person both bea and sig addressed was Glorfindel.
Oh, a theory!

Harvey "Glorfy" Dent held bea hostage last night, and someone targeted Glorfy for a NK.

you solved it Matt. Good work everyone. We can go home

Turnip Head wrote:
Dom wrote:Juliets what did you think when MP came under fire for describing his own civ meta?
Chrysanthemums warming radiated.

Ok TH. Is there something preventing you from using those emojis are responses? Because I'm not sure of your opinion.

Do you agree with DH's points against Juliets?

DharmaHelper wrote:You guys are right total coincidence Gordon mentions MAC and COFFEE in his posts. How dare I think a traditional gossip role would ever put his suspicions into his posts like that's ever happened before lmao.

Does this mean he has insider information? Doubtful.

Turnip Head wrote:
DharmaHelper wrote:See why would I bother looking into it if people already are dismissing my point lmao.
Chrysanthemums awarding dream it. Chrysanthemums awarding dam tire.

I don't like this insanifier. Do we think this is the extension of the Riddler for not figuring out the riddle yesterday?

Sorsha wrote:So they had to have logged in to have talked to their btsc mates?

I know that a couple of the speed games have had btsc threads on the forum here. Are you assuming that this game has them also?

Ohhhhh you have a point. I forgot that aspect. Does Epi usually use chatzy or has anyone seen Epi-hosted games migrating to threads in syndicate for Mafia chat?

This also isn't damning or anything because it was two different teams, but I found slightly coincidental: the last person both bea and sig addressed was Glorfindel.

Speaking of, my man: let's say that you were a vanilla cop. Hypothetically, of course, but which inmate would you want dead? Hypothetically, of course.

Sorsha wrote:Why does them not being logged into the site mean they had nothing to do with the decision to kill bea?

Well, I dunno about you, but if I were Mafia, I wouldn't have even discussed who I'm killing until after the lynch. But maybe I'm being a bit presumptuous. But I don't think anyone operates like that.

Mac brings up a good point in that Gordon probably doesn't know shit about anyone and is just throwing shit together in a pot and stirring. If he wasn't, is he getting it straight from batman? Wouldn't he say so?

Also, sprityo and ekeknat haven't been logged in since before yesterday's lynch, so I while that doesn't absolve them from being secondhand on the mafia team that killed bea, they themselves had nothing to do with the decision to kill her.

MacDougall wrote:Let me tell you about dat Scarecrow, I think it's time we go Scarecrow hunting if y'all know what I mean.

I hope the scarecrow asked you to kill Scarecrow.

juliets wrote:
Scotty wrote:Hmm. That's an odd choice in my book. I didn't see her getting much beef from anyone. A safe kill for mafia maybe?

I don't see the Juliets correlation in what Gordon wrote, DH?? That quote is about coffee.

Linki: what links you and coffee, Juliets? That you take it intravenously or something?
My user name started out being 'juliets coffee' and then i shortened it to juliets. Thats why some people call me JC.

Ah! I had no idea. Well that's interesting. Do you think Gordon is someone that has a lot of history with you, Jules?

Turnip Head wrote:Chrysanthemums awarding rim date.

sprityo wrote:well figuring theres about 8 hours between now and then, that's about one to two pages worth of stuff. i honestly would rather remove lurkers form the game so that we can get off the topic and therefore actually start going after people without any other excuse to not lynch them

8 hours later..

sprityo wrote:Oh gee, who do i vote for?

*glances* guess it's SockFace

Did you vote for Mp because you realize that a lurker wasn't getting lynched, sprityo? Because this isn't helping you form any semblance of consistency.

Inb4 MP votes himself again

Hmm. That's an odd choice in my book. I didn't see her getting much beef from anyone. A safe kill for mafia maybe?

I don't see the Juliets correlation in what Gordon wrote, DH?? That quote is about coffee.

Linki: what links you and coffee, Juliets? That you take it intravenously or something?

DFaraday wrote:Voted the hospital because I haven't been there yet.

Turnip Head wrote:
MovingPictures07 wrote: sprityo -- The d2 lynch doesn't really give us any information about sprityo (he voted last for Nero, and many of his posts have not been particularly thick in content. In addition, his d3 vote for Floyd could be seen as an easily justifiable vote for a lurker to avoid coming up with suspicions. Not a good look. With that said, I am tone reading him as genuine, and he has brought forth insight throughout the game, mainly in the form of questions. I need to really think about him more though; he's the weakest of my town reads and could easily drop to a mafia read if he doesn't pick up more townie points.
Has anyone read sprityo's ISO? It's full of sketch. It's all mechanics questions for the hosts, discussion of mechanics, and last minute votes. In lynches with a clear runaway candidate, sprityo votes with the majority. In tighter lynches which would require him to take a stand, he votes for Floyd or talks about how we should get rid of the nonparticipants. The pattern is clear. sprityo is doing his best to not do anything that will put him in the spotlight. I encourage everyone to reread him. Let's get this guy in the hotseat pronto.
You're right, I just read back over Sprityo's posts and was astonished to see that he has 83 posts, yet I couldn't remember a single comment from him all game. He's been pushing for low/nonposters from Day 1 to the present and asks questions without giving much opinion himself. And, as you said, the bandwagony votes only give him a worse look.

I agree that band wagoners might be something to look at, but at the same time I still think mafia would be putting votes away from the beaten path. Like, I don't really know how you play as mafia, but it sure looks to me like it would be easy to put suspicion on band wagoners because there have been so many.

Your responses have been quite carefully crafted, I feel. I just can't shake that you're playing it safe this game, but I can't put my finger on exactly how that indicts you as a baddie.

Actually I take back what I said.
Doc, save TH tonite. I think he is more important to the civvie cause this game than I have been. And j tend to agree with his most recent post.

Glorf, I have said early on that I am inherently suspicious of nice posters, and you have exuded niceties all game. You're very expressive in your language.
But your general ideas seem fringing on actual theories and illogical paths. I don't mean to discourage you if you're completely genuine. Hell, my first few games here were just throwing out theories and hoping any stuck.
But most of your defenses have been reading as "I don't understand why you suspect me because I'm good" or "I'm not bad, because I'm good".

I don't buy the theory that you are TwoFace. I think Matt is stretching there, nor would I see a point in leaving breadcrumbs for that role. I thought maybe you could be neutral for a long time, and mayhaps you are, but I think you are not civ. Based on your arguments and counter arguments.

MovingPictures07 wrote:For those of you who contend that my actions have resulted in a lynch in which we "learned nothing" and are doubting that there was a point to everything, let me lay out the following:

- The only role with a publicly known lynch stop is Robin. He is a town-friendly independent.
- The only other roles that could be responsible for a lynch stop inevitably are those with *Secrets* qualifiers. There are no GCPD or mafia roles with *Secrets*, thus making the other possibilities inmate-based.

The inmates with *Secrets* in their roles are: Joker (deceased, Black Rock), The Riddler, Poison Ivy, and Bane.

That leaves three distinctly independent possibilities for my actions. Poison Ivy, if you're inclined to believe I was not lying about being poisoned, is not only an illogical fit for my behavior but a thematically unlikely one. Given PI can poison someone every night and her role seems to center around that function, it doesn't stand to reason why she would have a lynch stop. The Riddler and Bane are possible. I will not role hint or role out myself, but I have given you all the following information:

I can only be one of four roles. None of those roles are Mafia roles (or GCPD, for that matter).

So I have the following questions for you:
1) If I am Robin, then what explanation do you see in my ISO for my behavior?
2) If I am The Riddler, then what explanation do you see in my ISO for my behavior?
3) If I am Bane, then what explanation do you see in my ISO for my behavior?

Since we don't know the *Secrets* to The Riddler and Bane, let's talk about Robin.

Robin is rewarded for every mafia (5%) and inmate (12%) lynch, and punished for every GCPD (negative 2%) and Wayne Manor (negative 8%) lynch. Even though the punishment for a dead GCPD may seem minuscule, it is mathematically difficult to reach 100% to begin with, let alone with each additional GCPD death; moreover, it is mathematically impossible for Wayne Manor to win if GCPD do not win.

If I am Robin, therefore, I have no reason to actively work against the GCPD's cause; if anything, I have incentive to work with it. In addition, we all know that the lynch was stopped d1 when Scotty and DrWilgy were tied for the lynch. If anyone recalls my Wilgy = Robin theory, the main result out of it was that I proposed that Scotty is confirmed civilian. If instead I am Robin, I gained by perpetuating that theory because, if I did save Scotty, it gives me a way to disseminate information about a civilian without outing myself.

Note that the Mafia have no incentives whatsoever to kill any of Wayne Manor, since they win once GCPD are dead. Since I am confirmed not to be GCPD, then there is no reason for me to draw any night kills. If I do, then that's a night kill that doesn't go to a civilian, and the mafia are stupid. Conversely, there is no reason for me to be lynched, since GCPD and inmates do not need me dead specifically (again, there are *Secrets*, but we can't speculate on unknown qualities). Regarding Scotty then, since he was nearly lynched d1, he is saved from being lynched subsequently, and if the Mafia want to get rid of him, they will have to use up a night kill to do so. But in doing so, they don't even know whether Scotty actually is GCPD or whether he's Wayne Manor, the latter of which they do not need dead to win.

Now, if I'm The Riddler or Bane, then I want to tell you as little as possible about my *Secrets*, I would imagine, and I would want to float this "I am Robin" theory as much as I can without directly outing myself, since it would be in my own best interest.

It's up to you to decide what role you think my actions reflect. I had been catching suspicion since the start of the game, but it intensified in the aftermath of the d2 lynch. I figured my lynch would be inevitable; rather, I wanted it to be, and I thought it would be best to get it out of the way now before any other variables mess with the plan. In addition, most of my chaos posting specifically designed to get myself lynch was enacted before I was cured of poison, and I wanted to be lynched before the poison could take its toll.

At the bare minimum, now you all know that I can only be less than a handful of roles, and that there is potential additional information. Of course, this is all assuming that none of the roles excluding *Secrets* do not have additional abilities or information.

So, please, tell me how we've "learned nothing".

Doc, save me tonight.

Make that 3 roles, but I'm relatively sure I know which of them it is.
Also a very good chance that the Penguin now knows MP's role.
I actually agree with most of MP's list.
Can we lynch Glorf tomorrow? Please?

Scotty out.

well I got a little bug and was throwing up every hour on the hour last night and am traveling all day today. I will not be on at all and still feel like shit. I'm trying my best not to have the guy next to me get nervous and get me thrown of lf the plane because of Ebola or some shit.

Dom wrote:I don't trust MP. I tink it's become obvious he isn't bad, but I do not trust him.

Who is he then, Dom? Because I thematically see two possibilities, and one of those possibilities I've already expressed interest in before day 4 started. I think MP is nothing but good for town.

Ebwop: fkin phone. Fog = cig = civ

Dom wrote:
S~V~S wrote:Yeah I haven't seen any of the newer Batman films either. So maybe I will dig up Batman & Robin.

As for the lynch, I don't particularly think I have seen evil MP, he finds it so hard to keep that glee out of his tone when he's bad, but if he wants to go he wants to go.

I also still think THs case on Mac had merit, but if everyone is seeing this breadcrumb, I could not find it, but I will take peoples word for it. The fact that TH made the case, then backed off of it hard must make it a fairly substantial one. So I am willing to step back on that, but I don't love it.

I will be in and out today, but will be in for the night well before the poll ends.
I think TH's case has merit too, and I do not see the crumb. I think it's worth noting that when we were going into this day phase Mac was panicking about being lynched and is now not even being considered by most.

DharmaHelper wrote:YO YOU GUYS REMEMBER THAT DUDE WHO SAID HE WAS SURPRISED HE WAS TAKING SUSPICION SINCE HE WAS PLAYING UP HIS TOWN META LMAO

Catch a vote son
tru
Scotty wrote:Wel I'm currently in the mountains with limited service.

I like Faraday's response to my case. But I'm still under suspicion that he could be a smooth operator. Most of my perspective is speculation and the evidence of his voting and reasoning is going to rub suspicious no matter what he says to the contrary.

I know a bunch of you said it was a "nice case" but no one was willing to expand on it or take action. IMO he is not one of the other Mafia so I'm fine with leaving this to tomorrow but I do want to come back to it.

I need to vote soon before I lose service so I will be voting Glorfindel in the off chance that he isn't two face,

Also, for you MP voters- what if Mp is Ras Al Ghul? Do we really want the chance of Nero coming back like a nasty burrito burp?
What if Mac is Ras Al Ghul
What if I am Ras Al Ghul
What if you are Ras Al Ghul
What if....
This argument is so pointless. We have no real reason to think he is Ras Al Ghul. You can say this about any player.

MovingPictures07 wrote:Who else finds it interesting that Dom has been voicing consistent suspicions of me since Day 0, yet hasn't shown the balls to actually vote for me today? Come on, son, I already have 5 votes and I'm begging to be lynched. What the hell is keeping you?
"interesting"
What about it is interesting? What does it tell you?

Maybe Ihaven't even been online since my last post.

MovingPictures07 wrote:Magikarp's splashes are about as effective as my baddie hunting this game. Bork bork bork!
Except Magikarp splashes and you haven't baddie hunted at all.

I think MP thinks he won't win. He insn't defending himself with any vigor like he did in Star Wars where he was bad, but this is also a game that is so out of meta for MP that I can't really tolerate that comparison.

Dom that's literally the only justification I can see in him trying to get lynched.

And @Mac, I never said he was cig friendly. I just don't think he is mafia. And I fear that if he is not fog friendly, then he doesn't have our best interests in mind for getting himself lynched.

I don't think MP is mafia at this point and I'm not sure I want to give in to his demands to kill himself. Assisted suicide is a controversial topic and will be the next major cultural debate in this country, but I don't think we're ready to broach that topic yet.

And are all of you with an MP content with the prospect of him being Ras Al Ghul? It would seem that no one is considering that possibility. We don't know the alignment of Wilgy, zebra or sig. I don't think Wilgy or sig are bad but who the hell knows. I would be very much surprised if MP is in fact bad based on his play thus far

Wel I'm currently in the mountains with limited service.

I like Faraday's response to my case. But I'm still under suspicion that he could be a smooth operator. Most of my perspective is speculation and the evidence of his voting and reasoning is going to rub suspicious no matter what he says to the contrary.

I know a bunch of you said it was a "nice case" but no one was willing to expand on it or take action. IMO he is not one of the other Mafia so I'm fine with leaving this to tomorrow but I do want to come back to it.

I need to vote soon before I lose service so I will be voting Glorfindel in the off chance that he isn't two face,

Also, for you MP voters- what if Mp is Ras Al Ghul? Do we really want the chance of Nero coming back like a nasty burrito burp?

Golden wrote:Matt - explain this.

You think it was zebra, but you got Shakespeare the next day. So you think someone can be cursed after the death of the riddler.

Isn't is possible it was sig, and the same has happened to TH? Couldn't you both be right, in your own way?

In Matt's defense, night powers continue after a death.

Do we think that any of Nero's teammates would have jumped on him early without provacation?

Looking through some people that voted sig, I'm finding DFaraday fishy.

Spoiler: show

This is the first time he mentions Nero, bringing him up as a suspect early on when he hadn't much of any heat. This is the one thing that goes in DFaraday's favor. Why mention Nero, out of all the people her could have named as a potential suspect?

Spoiler: show

This is where DFaraday seems like he might be defending a bit.

Nero complains that he isn't the Riddler. Matt comes in and calls out Nero to be mafia. Then DFaraday swoops in and brings up Enrique's theory that Nero might be the joker BUT BUT BUT then does a good job of waving the carrot on a stick back over to Matt during Day 2, suggesting Matt isn't town, and should be lynched to see if Nero is really the joker.
Ignoring Matt's claim that Nero is mafia instead of the Joker/Riddler.

Spoiler: show

DFaraday keeps with this Joker theory, offering scenarios that Matt could be using to find Nero bad, but settling on the "statistics" that Matt is probably Bad.
"Matt: Why do you suspect Nero?" Is the grandstanding question he uses to size Matt up. I think this could be because DFaraday knew Nero was bad, and wanted to figure out how Matt knew.

Spoiler: show

DFaraday uses zebra's defense of Nero as a springboard. He says he's sorta suspicious of Nero, but puts the blame on the bandwagoners and the "convenience" of his vote. Throwing them under the bus even before the result of Nero's alignment. To further distance, he comes out of nowhere with a 'sig's comments make me feel like he's bad'.

Spoiler: show

He gets on LoRab's case for only claiming Matt is the Joker. Which is calling the kettle black, because that's ALL DFaraday has done concerning Nero.
"Matt has denied claiming Nero as the Joker" -oh, so now he's giving credence to Matt's suggestions?
"you haven't cited any reasons since for still suspecting Nero" -defending again.

He finally settles on sig, but not before feeling suspicious of LoRab, for doing exactly what he was doing.

Nero's team wanted sig dead.

I dunno guys, I don't think DFaraday is looking good from my standpoint.

Golden wrote:
DFaraday wrote:I'd also have to agree with whoever said that MP and Matt aren't helping anything by curse-posting so much.
Maybe curse posting comes with minimum limits. Everyone who has been cursed won't shut up.

I dunno. Matt's just a chatty cathy.
It does give credence to why MP was so involved suddenly and posting in only single responses per post...

I really feel like Matt's curse had an end goal with the changing plays, though. I know he can't comment on it without fear of some penalty or whatever, but I would have liked to see what he meant by "getting a hint to a location of an inmate"

@HOSTS
1. Are we privvy to the knowledge of who has asked to be replaced in this game, or is there a confidentiality agreement for that kind of stuff?
2. How often do you wash your hair? Just wondering. I've started washing every other day and the compliments are rolling in!

Matt wrote:Anyway, I'm gonna go check out some B:TAS (I've been watching since game started, love this show!). If anyone wants a bad guy or two lynched, look no further then fake cursed Turnip or his new best friend Mac.

Matt, did you ever think Poison Ivy could be responsible?

I have a theory that MP was cured from his poison if he was made to vote for sig.
Maybe TH could be cured from poison if he talks like this for a phase. Plus who knows what Bane does.

I'm just saying that it may not be the Riddler at all, if your theory of zebra = riddler is true.

Sorry, I must have missed it, Glorf.

Glorfindel wrote:
bea wrote:
Glorfindel wrote:
Turnip Head wrote:Glorfindel.... any thoughts on which player might have wanted to silence you? You don't have to speculate in the thread, I just want you to think about it.
I've actually been thinking about that a lot and not only who but their possible motives... And no clue yet... I'm actually at work right now which will severely hamper my capacity to post for the next few hours... Sorry!
I'm curious as to whether or not you saw anything from the last phase as a result of being silenced. I'm sorry if someone else already asked you and I've not gotten there yet. It's just sometimes silencing can be a good thing. It's a different experience to read along as things happen but not have to talk. I was curious as to whether or not you saw something the rest of us might have missed.
Hey, bea I'm very pleased to make your acquaintance That's a good point, but no. To be honest, I was more relieved than anything when I found out I was silenced. Do we know who is silenced today? Is everyone accounted for so far?

As far as my suspicions right now, I don't have a lot. The whole Sig situation has shaken my confidence to the core. Typhoony seems rather strange to me this game for reasons I can't quite put my finger on but looking back to Pikmin Mafia, he was Captain Charlie and his identity was revealed only to me. The funny thing was, even though he was Town, had I not know he was, I think I could've been forgiven to think he wasn't. MP is kinda interesting - I was Mafia with him in Star Wars and as a consequence, I have the greatest admiration and respect for his ability. From conversations I've had with him, I honestly can't seem him as one of those 'Self-lynching' types - I think he's too proud for that despite what pressure he may feel from his real life circumstances. We've got a long way to go this Day phase but I have to say I can't see myself voting for him at this stage...

So do you suspect Typh? You say you "could've been forgiven" in thinking Typh was bad when he was good in Pikmin. I'm not even sure how that correlates to this game. Are you saying without the handicap, you would have read him wrong, and now you are nervous you are reading him wrong this game? I feel like your intrigue of him is circular and non-committal.
And MP is "interesting". I agree, he's an interesting sock, indeed. But you say you probably won't vote him, because he's too proud to self-lynch.

So you were away for a day and have no suspicions whatsoever?

You are interesting, Glorfindel.

@HOSTS
If the Scarecrow targets their own role (i.e. Penguin must kill himself) how the hell does that work?

Also, what if MP is trying to kill himself because he needs himself dead to win?

Turnip Head wrote:
Matt wrote:Bullz, I actually think Riddler might've been Zebra.

I was under the impression sig was Bullock based on Zeebs getting hit like that, some players assumed sig to be Montoya, and the Night post hints at sig being a cop of some sort, so I seriously doubt sig was Riddler.

This brings up the question, though...

If Riddler is dead (and I very much believe him to be), and the Joker was lynched yesterday...

What's up with Turnip's "curse" ?
Yuoo ere-a a strunge-a leettle-a mun. I cun cunffurm yuoo ere-a 100% vrung ebuoot thees. Um gesh dee bork, bork!

He's a small town politician from Vermont. Give him a chance!

Turnip Head wrote:
Scotty wrote:Hypothetically, would it ruin the game if you were to come out with this perceived breadcrumb? Because most of us simply don't have time to comb through Mac's finely-braided mane of posts looking for something we may or may not recognize as a breadcrumb. Like, I went through 5 pages of his posts before I realized that I wouldn't even know I was looking at a rolehint if I tried.
I'm nut cumeeng oooot veet unytheeng, su yuoor oonly oopshuns ere-a tu seerch hees pusts cereffoolly oor soospect heem unyvey. Bork bork bork! Ere-a yuoo luukeeng tu fute-a fur Mec? Iff nut, vhy dues it metter?

In zee ifent yuoo ere-a zee rule-a thet Mec hes breedcroombed, I troost it vuoold be-a iesy inuoogh fur yuoo tu feend. Bork bork bork!

I don't know if I'm voting for Mac or not. I hadn't really suspected him, but also I am open to any vote today.
I just feel like you're hyping it up to oblivion, and if it comes out, it's going to be like the Star Wars prequels.

umm ok linki. thanks for not notifying me i got a response. sorry TH

Turnip Head wrote:
Matt wrote:Btw Turnip, Glorfindel obviously claimed Two-Face so I guess we should just take him at his word and stop sussing him now, right?
I cun tell yuoo steell hefe-a nut fuoond Mec's breedcroomb becoose-a iff yuoo deed yuoo vuooldn't be-a mekeeng thees surt ooff nunsenseecel cumment. Um de hur de hur de hur. Mec's croomb is cumpletely deefffferent thun yuoo cleeeming Tvu-Fece-a oon Glurffeendel's behelff. Zeere-a is reesun tu beleeefe-a hees heent is genooeene-a.

I literally just um de hur de hur de hur'd out loud at this statement.
Is it putting Mac in danger to just come out with it?

Glorfindel wrote:
Scotty wrote:
Scotty wrote:RIP sig. I honestly think you were good, or at least town-centric.

So glorf. You have used the argument "I don't know why anyone would view me as bad because I'm obviously good" twice now. That's like walking into McDonalds, standing in the line for 10 minutes without saying anything, tapping your foot and going, "Well? Why is my food not out yet?"

What makes you so obviously civ, Glorf?
This is a rhetorical question, btw Glorf. Because you're no more obviously civ than I am.

I just cringe when I hear that as an argument, and it doesn't make you seem any more civ than I you make yourself out to be.
Now that sig is gone and out of your hair, any better suspicions?
Yes, Scotty - I understand that it was a rhetorical question - hence why you didn't get an answer And with reference to your analogy, yes - and may I have fries with that?

And yeah, I know - you've got absolutely no reason to believe a word I say - I completely understand that too. All I can say is that I've been on both sides of the coin in the two games I've played here at The Syndicate before this one. Now I don't know how it looked to anyone else, but I certainly felt the difference from this side. I don't know how that presents to you but I have to think that it must surely be very obvious

Thanks for patently ignoring my last question there, Glorf.

Turnip Head wrote:
Matt wrote:
Turnip Head wrote:
Matt wrote:Turnip Head, are you still suss of Mac or do you think he's clean based on you finding his supposed breadcrumb?
I'm treeteeng hees cleeem es genooeene-a unteel I see-a reesun tu duoobt it. Um de hur de hur de hu
I think you made a very solid case against Mac the other day and am wondering why you're still not pursuing it. Because Mac made a *claim* in thread?

Tbh, I think it's odd when you made a great case on Mac, a lesser case on Black Rock, vote Black Rock, suddenly day comes around and you've magically found his breadcrumb and you now take whatever that breadcrumb was solely at his word.

My cese-a oon Mec mede-a a lut ooff sense-a boot zeere-a ves elveys zee chunce-a it ves meesgooided. Bork bork bork! In a geme-a vhere-a futes ere-a nut chungeeble-a it's herd tu poot pressoore-a oon peuple-a thet duesn't ind in zeem getteeng lynched. Bork bork bork! I poot es mooch pressoore-a oon Mec es I cuoold tu get a reed oon heem und tooerds zee ind ooff Dey he-a felt genooeene-a tu me-a.Zee breedcroomb oonly edded tu thet feeleeng. I deedn't "megeecelly" feend unytheeng, hefe-a yuoo ifee gune-a tu luuk fur it? Iferyune-a in zee geme-a shuoold, becoose-a iff he's lyeeng zeere-a is et leest oone-a ceefiliun vhu cun deespoote-a it. Um de hur de hur de hur.

Yuoo feend it oodd becoose-a I theenk ve-a eppruech zee geme-a deefffferently. Bork bork bork! Yuoo essoome-a yuoo ere-a reeght und let thet culur yuoor percepshun ooff zee threed. Bork bork bork! I essoome-a zeere-a is elveys a chunce-a thet I em vrung und try my best tu cunseeder ell ungles. Um gesh dee bork, bork!

Hypothetically, would it ruin the game if you were to come out with this perceived breadcrumb? Because most of us simply don't have time to comb through Mac's finely-braided mane of posts looking for something we may or may not recognize as a breadcrumb. Like, I went through 5 pages of his posts before I realized that I wouldn't even know I was looking at a rolehint if I tried.

Dom wrote:Why would the baddies NK someone they suspect is baddie? Why wouldn't they lynch them?

Maybe they tried a couple times, but to no avail...plus why not get rid of your supposed competition?

Scotty wrote:RIP sig. I honestly think you were good, or at least town-centric.

So glorf. You have used the argument "I don't know why anyone would view me as bad because I'm obviously good" twice now. That's like walking into McDonalds, standing in the line for 10 minutes without saying anything, tapping your foot and going, "Well? Why is my food not out yet?"

What makes you so obviously civ, Glorf?

This is a rhetorical question, btw Glorf. Because you're no more obviously civ than I am.

I just cringe when I hear that as an argument, and it doesn't make you seem any more civ than I you make yourself out to be.
Now that sig is gone and out of your hair, any better suspicions?

Search found 177 matches