The Syndicate

Just popped in to see whats happened. Hey we won! Nice one Matt and everyone. Thanks for the game mods.

Really sorry for playing like I did, especially in a champs game. That was shitty but I was and still am legit on holiday and wasn't going to be spending time on here. I just did what I could to not get modkilled cos there was no more replacements.

I know why i survived a nightkill attempt but i have no idea what happened with the lynch thing. If it wasnt just vote manipulation then thanks whoever did that, cool move.

Voting metalmarsh.

Having fun on holiday in case anyone is interested

Draconus wrote:
motel room wrote:I'm in Perth now having a holiday. Voting Draconus.
You voted with me for Wilgy last time.... Da fuq?

Yes? That doesnt mean youre good.

Still not Kubrick. Its hard to get invested cos I dont care here on holiday but hey check it I'm not Kubrick. So Kubrick is still a bad out there. Ok its 2:30am I'm going to bed.

I'm in Perth now having a holiday. Voting Draconus.

Righty-o. Pleasure to be a part of that. I'm off to the zoo.

DharmaHelper wrote:
MacDougall wrote:
DharmaHelper wrote:Question to Mac: Do you think a Sorsha lynch would land a baddie or do you just not want to lynch Wilgy?
I think there's a better chance but it's still low. I think there is an almost 100% chance a Draco lynch does.
Do you think Motel Room is Kubrick?

This fuciking guy again. My mate.

Metalmarsh89 wrote:
motel room wrote:hi I have a couple of minutes while I wait for someone to get ready whats happening?
Hello Stan.

Skimming here but who brought up that I could be Kubrick? Odds on Kubrick being:
whoever brought that up > people silently not mentioning it > whoever agreed

Cos there's at least one joker out there who knows I'm not Kubrick.

hi I have a couple of minutes while I wait for someone to get ready whats happening?

Greetings from adelaide amidst the truckin' lyf. Voting wilgy.

Metalmarsh89 wrote:
motel room wrote:
DharmaHelper wrote:Is Wigly srsly being saved right now? Can we go one lynch without fucking ourselves raw?
wait, why Wilgy? I'm voting marsh cos he's neutral whatever that is

A neutral is not unlike a mason.

How? A mason is a town guy who has a confirmed town buddy and vice versa. What does a neutral do? Some one else can answer if MM specifying is "infodumping" by answering

DharmaHelper wrote:
motel room wrote:
DharmaHelper wrote:Is Wigly srsly being saved right now? Can we go one lynch without fucking ourselves raw?
wait, why Wilgy? I'm voting marsh cos he's neutral whatever that is
Can I take a screenshot of this and frame it for when you flip mafia?

Im not flipping mafia and your first reaction is always dumb snark when I ask a question apparently

DharmaHelper wrote:Is Wigly srsly being saved right now? Can we go one lynch without fucking ourselves raw?

wait, why Wilgy? I'm voting marsh cos he's neutral whatever that is

voting metalmarsh

Draconus wrote:Is Motel Room lurking?

Serious? let me read shit

How does a "neutral" win? Is that just a rogue?

Draconus wrote:
DharmaHelper wrote:How many people feel comfortable with Dr. Wigly, Motel Room, Blooper, Juliet, or Sorsha? Who is willing to bet me one or more of these individuals is mafia? Can we please lynch one of them today to put my mind at east?
Can I bet Smashcoins?
Is Motel Room still playing this game? Do I keep forgetting about him?

Im still a guy in this, yep. Not cursed and not modkilled either by some stroke of luck. I've been busy out the wazoo and I'm about to road trip from Melbourne to Adelaide to Perth. I don't want to just be a seatwarmer though.

im here, did a vote for a position dealie.

i've had no time whatsoever. Getting ridiculous, I probably am. if im too shit lets talk about it later. Jumping on tranq

DharmaHelper wrote:
motel room wrote:
DharmaHelper wrote:
Dom wrote:
DharmaHelper wrote:
MacDougall wrote:
DharmaHelper wrote:Yay!
He says while clenching his buttcheeks and a forced grin with teeth bared.
I'm actually quite pleased to have been wrong. Not sure where this leaves me in terms of suspects, but I'll have a look and see what pops out
Not sure why this would change whether you suspect JJJ or not.
I mean moreso those I thought were bussing LoRab.
Is it this? You dropped names cos you thought we were bussing Lorab?
Are you seriously just pulling quotes and saying shit that makes no sense?

Yes? Feel free to help clarify though dingus.

DharmaHelper wrote:
Dom wrote:
DharmaHelper wrote:
MacDougall wrote:
DharmaHelper wrote:Yay!
He says while clenching his buttcheeks and a forced grin with teeth bared.
I'm actually quite pleased to have been wrong. Not sure where this leaves me in terms of suspects, but I'll have a look and see what pops out
Not sure why this would change whether you suspect JJJ or not.
I mean moreso those I thought were bussing LoRab.

Is it this? You dropped names cos you thought we were bussing Lorab?

DharmaHelper wrote:
motel room wrote:
DharmaHelper wrote:
Ricochet wrote:
motel room wrote:
DharmaHelper wrote:My point being I saw the general circumstances behind the LoRab train to be suspect. I pulled the two most suspicious votes as examples in retrospect, but at the time the train as a whole looked sketchy to me due to the quickness with which it formed and the flimsy nature of some of its supporters.

i.e the same point I've made six million times.
Gonna vote me some DharmaHelper
Hiya what sounds unreasonable to you in that quote?
your defence of not voting Lorab and pointing out specific names of who's votes on the other wagon "rubbed you the worng way" felt like you'd had it up your sleeve and practiced it. You named me and I know I said I was voting to save jjj so that's not really "flimsy", that's a stance. And like someone else pointed out I voted after you so
Homie you didn't read shit I said did you lol

I don't respond to "homie" but I am very very much behind. Catch me up, if so.

DharmaHelper wrote:
Ricochet wrote:
motel room wrote:
DharmaHelper wrote:My point being I saw the general circumstances behind the LoRab train to be suspect. I pulled the two most suspicious votes as examples in retrospect, but at the time the train as a whole looked sketchy to me due to the quickness with which it formed and the flimsy nature of some of its supporters.

i.e the same point I've made six million times.
Gonna vote me some DharmaHelper
Hiya what sounds unreasonable to you in that quote?

your defence of not voting Lorab and pointing out specific names of who's votes on the other wagon "rubbed you the worng way" felt like you'd had it up your sleeve and practiced it. You named me and I know I said I was voting to save jjj so that's not really "flimsy", that's a stance. And like someone else pointed out I voted after you so

MacDougall wrote:Oh wait I didn't realise we were so close to a fun tie. Reserving the right to change my vote again to cause it.

Chaos mac

A lot of the Tranq votes are worded as being dropped tentatively but they're still there.

DharmaHelper wrote:My point being I saw the general circumstances behind the LoRab train to be suspect. I pulled the two most suspicious votes as examples in retrospect, but at the time the train as a whole looked sketchy to me due to the quickness with which it formed and the flimsy nature of some of its supporters.

i.e the same point I've made six million times.

Gonna vote me some DharmaHelper

DharmaHelper wrote:
motel room wrote:
DharmaHelper wrote:
MacDougall wrote:
DharmaHelper wrote:Guys I think a role has been discovered but I'm not sure.
Lol

Wow sucks for HB. Who would he have hidden behind?
Who looked towniest after the LoRab flip?

S~V~S wrote:And To think it all could have been avoided if Hamburger Boy had hidden behind a civvie
It basically says he hid behind Epi
No it doesn't?

Derr ok I see nvm.

Ok I have the whole of the last Day to catch up on.

A 4 way tie? This should be interesting

DharmaHelper wrote:
MacDougall wrote:
DharmaHelper wrote:Guys I think a role has been discovered but I'm not sure.
Lol

Wow sucks for HB. Who would he have hidden behind?
Who looked towniest after the LoRab flip?

S~V~S wrote:And To think it all could have been avoided if Hamburger Boy had hidden behind a civvie

It basically says he hid behind Epi

hi im here I exist, I'll catch up, sorry I missed the vote and missed the boat. I was having a weekend away at the beach.

Pretty interested in JJJ's reaction to this

juliets wrote:
motel room wrote:
juliets wrote:
HamburgerBoy wrote:
juliets wrote:I am taking the position that Tranq is not silenced. I mean, who would silence him he's been silent all game. Now he comes in and votes for Lorab after being in no conversation about the dynamic of this lynch. I am voting him.
Place it where it matters, vote Jimmy to negate Tranq's vote.
Hmmmm - Mac who has played with Jimmy in over 50 games see's his behavior as scum. I said I wasn't going to vote for JJJ but Mac is pretty persuasive. And I don't mind changing my mind at the last minute so ok - I will negate Tranqs vote by voting Jimmy.
yikes
juliets wrote:JJJ I agree with you 100%. I also think the exchange reads genuine on both sides thus it doesn't lead me to believe either of the two are bad. If something else happens that causes me to come back and re-look at this down the road I will. Right now I'm more focused on neither of these two (no chance for Golden) being lynched. Or JJJ either. There are too many people I am leaning good on, i need to find the baddies.

juliets wrote:I am about to read Boomslang as I am not looking at a JJJ vote or a llama vote (though I'll wait to see what Golden says). I will also wait to hear what Boomslang says about the latest thoughts about him.
You said you wouldn't vote him but now voted him based off another person';s read. Are you that sold on LoRab being town?
Another person who has more experience playing with JJJ than anyone in the game. If he fooled me, then he fooled me and I learned a lesson about his play. But he sounded genuine and sure to me. I don't know JJJ hardly at all, i've maybe been in a couple of games with him.

but why him over LoRab?

juliets wrote:
HamburgerBoy wrote:
juliets wrote:I am taking the position that Tranq is not silenced. I mean, who would silence him he's been silent all game. Now he comes in and votes for Lorab after being in no conversation about the dynamic of this lynch. I am voting him.
Place it where it matters, vote Jimmy to negate Tranq's vote.
Hmmmm - Mac who has played with Jimmy in over 50 games see's his behavior as scum. I said I wasn't going to vote for JJJ but Mac is pretty persuasive. And I don't mind changing my mind at the last minute so ok - I will negate Tranqs vote by voting Jimmy.

yikes

juliets wrote:JJJ I agree with you 100%. I also think the exchange reads genuine on both sides thus it doesn't lead me to believe either of the two are bad. If something else happens that causes me to come back and re-look at this down the road I will. Right now I'm more focused on neither of these two (no chance for Golden) being lynched. Or JJJ either. There are too many people I am leaning good on, i need to find the baddies.

juliets wrote:I am about to read Boomslang as I am not looking at a JJJ vote or a llama vote (though I'll wait to see what Golden says). I will also wait to hear what Boomslang says about the latest thoughts about him.

You said you wouldn't vote him but now voted him based off another person';s read. Are you that sold on LoRab being town?

voted LoRab then

So now there's no Boomslang votes after everyone seemed to eye each other off about that wagon.

Ricochet wrote:I want a writer's name, too, once I start ISO'ing.

Rick Coché.

Im thinking JJJ is jenuine. Not gonna vote him today so happy for my vote to help save him maybe.

I think Golden feels good too and

Golden wrote:I'd actually be ok seeing Sorsha or LoRab lynched.

thought Sorsha was ok so not sure why you're anti-her?

Why is JJJ's lynch tally so well hung right now? His apathy?

someone slap me if Im covering old ground. My catch up has been.. choppy.

Draconus wrote:
Ricochet wrote:
Draconus wrote:
Ricochet wrote:How many more "linki " must Draco do before he trademarks it? Compared to, like, posting anything significant about the game development.
TM pending. You're doing just fine keeping chatter up. I already know what I'm going to say for Day 1. Right now I'm just focusing on work while observing the thread.
Say it now. What's worth waiting 1 hour and a half?
I didn't want to distract from current discussion
Also, I just want to save it for my vote post.

Linki: That's quite the quote for 2 sentences

This rubbed me all the wrong ways when I was starting the catch up haul and only just got around to seeing how it played out. Cursed with questions then

Draconus wrote:
Matt wrote:Wow, cool result peeps.

Draconus, who do you think would curse you to ask questions?
Just scrolled the last page and saw this. Good question, Matt. I haven't the slightest clue. But it may have something to do with me saying "I already know what I'm going to say on Day 1" during Night 0. So maybe they wanted to make me look bad by preventing me from getting my thoughts across. Just speculating here

What were you holding out to say Drac? And seriously why not just say it?

Boomslang wrote:I'm running low on time before class, and I don't think I'll be able to vote after that. Quite disappointed in Drac's lack of posting today. I think the JJJ case is overblown; his effort with the smiley curse alone, when as a baddie he could have safely played it cool, makes me lean civ on him. Lorab's defense seems genuine, while sig is much more flippant. I don't like the games he played with smileys in a recent post, in particular; it's self-conscious, not natural. I'll put my vote *on sig* unless I find time on a class break to read more and change my mind.

Boomslang wrote:Damn, a disappointing result. Sorry sig, RIP in peace. I was swayed by incorrect arguments, I suppose; had I been around for the late swell of support on the wagon, I might have changed. Rico might be on to something with the 2/2 mislynch club and Tranq's shifty behavior.

Here you said sig was being flippant which earned your vote for him. Later you said it was incorrect arguments and "swayed" means they weren't your own. Excuses are icky. Both of these posts seem so constructed and practiced too.

Boomslang wrote:Linki w/Golden: Good illustration of the difference between civ read/buddying. Worth keeping in mind, imo.

also lol.

Reading through

Dom wrote:
JaggedJimmyJay wrote:

Dom, I said I don't use appeal to emotion to progress a baddie strategy, not that I never express emotion in any game.
This is so subjective it hurts.

It also seemed like a shot at Bea, tbh.

I didn't read JJJ's stuff up there in any way as a shot at Bea. And that you'd frame it in that way seems gross.

JaggedJimmyJay wrote:
motel room wrote:
JaggedJimmyJay wrote:I don't think my vote will stay there. I put it there a little bit ago so I could see the tally. I am suspicious of MM, but I don't think I have time tonight to push it.

JaggedJimmyJay wrote:
Metalmarsh89 wrote:You are correct. I recognized Ricochet's attempt to get lynched on Day 1, and was trying to counter anything he said and put a stop to it.

Calling zebra confirmed town had more to do with the fact the Ricochet was calling her confirmed scum, and less to do with the person in question.
I like this answer. I won't vote for you today.
Cool reason. You already said you wouldn't be voting him.
Is saying that twice suspicious?

I don't have time to be more thorough. I like his answer.

I am nowhere near current with this game and you might be wearing the supertown pants on pages 33-49 for all i know, but right here on this page it felt water-testing-y.

JaggedJimmyJay wrote:I don't think my vote will stay there. I put it there a little bit ago so I could see the tally. I am suspicious of MM, but I don't think I have time tonight to push it.

JaggedJimmyJay wrote:
Metalmarsh89 wrote:You are correct. I recognized Ricochet's attempt to get lynched on Day 1, and was trying to counter anything he said and put a stop to it.

Calling zebra confirmed town had more to do with the fact the Ricochet was calling her confirmed scum, and less to do with the person in question.
I like this answer. I won't vote for you today.

Cool reason. You already said you wouldn't be voting him.

yeah ok sig

I could help lynch him. My vote's a loose cannon at the moment. How exciting

sig I see you're in the lead where's your vote going?

RIP Bowie. Shit that was devestating kinda, as far as a celeb death goes.

I'm about halfway through. I'm about halfway gone.

any worth in asking what that day 0 poll was about?

Old mate wanted to get lynched, got lynched, is now a permanent but limited part of the game or something? Two nightkills, one town one scum? Day 2 motel room arrives crowd goes nuts? Is that about right?

Search found 51 matches