fingersplints wrote:MovingPictures07 wrote:fingersplints wrote:So I'm a bit torn on MP. I think that the thing that bothers me the most is actually that I feel like a lot of his posts have a "tell me why I'm bad" demanding vibe going on, and I associate that more with a baddie. The timing thing doesn't bother me (although I totes get where Epi is coming from - it could be he just didn't want to answer that question hoping it would be forgotten) and although I think the Gman thing is weird I don't think makes him bad. The same thing could be pointed out about MP - why even bring up the question of if it is faked when it would draw so much attention for it.
Golden and TH are also bothering me by their different play but I'm not sure it makes either bad necessarily.
BR is still my biggest suspect for defending MP and then saying she wasn't defending him. I will probably be voting there.
ALARM BELLS.
You are my new suspect.
Will elaborate fully when I don't have only like 2 minutes away from class.
" no u"
Lol alright MP
This isn't a NO U, especially since you visibly say that "I'm torn" on MP and that you "don't think it makes him bad", as above. I love how you waited for me to explain before denouncing whatever I could possibly come up with as a NO U. It's not that you talked about me only that I suspect you, it's what you've said, but also what you've failed to say. Also, it's VERY ironic that you claim NO U on me here. More on that in a bit.
First, please substantiate your claim (underlined). Can you back up where you are getting that vibe from my posts? Can you explain how that makes me bad or how that's not part of my meta? I frankly don't feel I've been that way at all and that it conflicts with my "cheerful" different style of play you and others have said I have, so that's Strike #1.
The bolded and italicized portion is Strike #2. You specifically say that "the timing thing", aka what Epi has brought up against me, doesn't bother you, yet you then proceed to follow it by you totally understand where Epi is coming from, so you're sending vague mixed signals to the thread. You do the same thing with the G-Man portion. What was the point of all of this? I suppose I don't understand how it relates to your read of me at all.
"Golden and TH are also bothering me by their different play but I'm not sure it makes either bad necessarily." What does this statement serve? It plants seeds of people hopping onto either play because weird = bad, and then when that comes up, you can say, 'Oh, well, I didn't say that, because I'm not sure it makes either bad!' I don't understand why you said this or what relevance it has to your reads on both players. It's incredibly vague. That's Strike #3.
Strike #4 is the biggest strike BY FAR and that is your suspicion of BR. First off, you NO U'd her 100%, which makes your incorrect "NO U" against me ironic to the highest degree. Second:
Black Rock wrote:
I will explain my MP post. Yes it does look like a defense. I don't consider it a defense because I was just stating fact as I seen it. I often don't explain everything going on in my mind, I like to keep my cards close to the vest. I only commented on it because I thought Elohcin's reasoning was off and it pinged me. I was waiting to see more before I announced her as a suspicion. I am very surprised that Splints thought I was suspicious because of this. She knows my play style better than most people playing this game. I'll be watching her as well.
How did this explanation not satisfy you? Can you elaborate? Again, you're vague.
Now, all of that said, I do want to try to avoid my prior style of railroading players, so I apologize if you felt put on the spot by "ALARM BELLS", and I definitely want to hear your response. I just happened to read your post and only had a few minutes, knew I wouldn't get the soonest possible chance to properly respond until at least 12:15PM Central, and wanted to at least indicate to you and others that I had sudden thoughts on your post that I would elaborate upon later.