Recruitment Mafia IV: Dawn of the Clans (End Game)

#5701

Roxy wrote:I had forgot I am playing with so many perfect people.

I was silenced.
I had posted before I went to my PM's bc I am hosting and was facing 17 PM's that morning.

I cannot believe not one of you thought of that. You just immediately went to - she is being nefarious, she has a lot of explaining to do, I think she is doing it on purpose

I did not know you were hosting... Sorry!

#5702

Stop thinking in only four dimensions.

#5703

Well well well.

#5704

Roxy wrote:I had forgot I am playing with so many perfect people.

I was silenced.
I had posted before I went to my PM's bc I am hosting and was facing 17 PM's that morning.

I cannot believe not one of you thought of that. You just immediately went to - she is being nefarious, she has a lot of explaining to do, I think she is doing it on purpose

So can you explain your entirely contradictory statements?

And did anyone else get told that they couldn't use their power on the second round of the last night?

#5705

Hello players. How are you? Fantastic. Does your role look like me? No. Can it smell like me? Yes. Should you vote for position 5? I don't know. Do you like Children of Serenity who are unkillable or capable of restarting days and corrupting powers? Do you want Brothers of the Inner Eye with triple votes, handing out powers, punishing people, learning targets and protecting people? Of course you do.

Swan dive!

Into the best position of your life. So players, should your vote smell like an Old Spice vote?

You tell me.

#5706

LoRab wrote:
Roxy wrote:I had forgot I am playing with so many perfect people.

I was silenced.
I had posted before I went to my PM's bc I am hosting and was facing 17 PM's that morning.

I cannot believe not one of you thought of that. You just immediately went to - she is being nefarious, she has a lot of explaining to do, I think she is doing it on purpose
So can you explain your entirely contradictory statements?

And did anyone else get told that they couldn't use their power on the second round of the last night?

I assume she meant she was told she couldn't use her powers twice last night. Whether that was enough to convince her she was wrong about there being two nights, I'm not sure, but I got the impression that she doesn't care :P

#5707

LoRab wrote:
Roxy wrote:I had forgot I am playing with so many perfect people.

I was silenced.
I had posted before I went to my PM's bc I am hosting and was facing 17 PM's that morning.

I cannot believe not one of you thought of that. You just immediately went to - she is being nefarious, she has a lot of explaining to do, I think she is doing it on purpose
So can you explain your entirely contradictory statements?

And did anyone else get told that they couldn't use their power on the second round of the last night?

Contradictory in YOUR opinion.
I used my power the first night the second night I was told I could not.Ergo there was two nights in a row.
maybe bc it is a wonky power idk but I am not going to role/ability out nor am I going to info dump - sorry.
was I silenced the first night - no but I was the second night

Why is it so hard to understan there was 2 nights in a row?
Not a delayed night with inevitable results.

Sorry if you do not agree but I am entitled to my own opinion.

#5708

Roxy wrote:
LoRab wrote:
Roxy wrote:I had forgot I am playing with so many perfect people.

I was silenced.
I had posted before I went to my PM's bc I am hosting and was facing 17 PM's that morning.

I cannot believe not one of you thought of that. You just immediately went to - she is being nefarious, she has a lot of explaining to do, I think she is doing it on purpose
So can you explain your entirely contradictory statements?

And did anyone else get told that they couldn't use their power on the second round of the last night?
Contradictory in YOUR opinion.
I used my power the first night the second night I was told I could not.Ergo there was two nights in a row.
maybe bc it is a wonky power idk but I am not going to role/ability out nor am I going to info dump - sorry.
was I silenced the first night - no but I was the second night

Why is it so hard to understan there was 2 nights in a row?
Not a delayed night with inevitable results.

Sorry if you do not agree but I am entitled to my own opinion.

I don't see how your opinion makes sense. If there were 2 nights in a row, why did we not have 2 nights' worth of results?

No one is asking you to info dump. I don't think you are being honest. Your response to people asking questions is to accuse them of being unfair to you--to asking you to break the rules and to not simply accept that you were silenced (when we don't, in fact, know that was the case--and, really, while it was brought up, it was said again and again that you could be silenced--why the accusatory tone at people questioning it?)

Yes, you are entitled to your opinion. But that doesn't mean that your posts don't make you seem bad.

#5709

I am neutral.

You are entitled to your opinion.

I am accusatory bc people are accusing me of lying about A - my stance of there being two nights and B - my silenceing.

Riddle me this - if there was not 2 nights why was I not silenced the first but I was the second night?

I think you are trying to set me up for lynch but it will only serve to make you look bad when I flip Neutral but by all means follow your heart.

#5710

neutral ftw

#5711

I'm more than happy to win with any of you fine folks. Let's do this.

#5712

Roxy wrote:I am neutral.

You are entitled to your opinion.

I am accusatory bc people are accusing me of lying about A - my stance of there being two nights and B - my silenceing.

Riddle me this - if there was not 2 nights why was I not silenced the first but I was the second night?

I think you are trying to set me up for lynch but it will only serve to make you look bad when I flip Neutral but by all means follow your heart.

I think you are wrong Roxy, and all empirical evidence points to you being wrong. This includes roles, host posts, and amount of kill attempts. Your silencing does not at all prove that you are right.

I don't think you are bad for being wrong, I'm just confused as to why you don't think you're wrong.

I'm probably going to stop talking about this, because I think it's clear to everyone else playing that you are wrong.

#5713

Not wrong and it will be proven end game or my death.

I am good with everyone thinking I am wrong.

#5714

Sorry everyone. Just realized I had replaced back into this game. Too tired to read anything tonight, but I'll start catching up again tomorrow afternoon/evening after work.

#5715

Roxy wrote:I am neutral.

You are entitled to your opinion.

I am accusatory bc people are accusing me of lying about A - my stance of there being two nights and B - my silenceing.

Riddle me this - if there was not 2 nights why was I not silenced the first but I was the second night?

I think you are trying to set me up for lynch but it will only serve to make you look bad when I flip Neutral but by all means follow your heart.

From the host posts themselves, both nights were the same night.
From you - you have weird night powers.

I can see (not a specific role as every new position I have to look to see what my powers are) how both of these could be true.

I guess my point is, I wasn't trying to lead you to a lynch, nor would I buy one that lead to you based on last night alone.

I *think* that you sawyer and I could possibly be the last neutrals out there. No one else is claiming it anyway.

TEEFIES IS BAD!!! BURN THE WITCH!!! BURRRN HER!! um, I mean him! WB Teefies!

#5716

#5717

I love me some Sam Seaborn. Even when he's working in the Parks Department. But really??!!! wtf is up with that pict???!!! They could have totes used a better Parks pict!!

#5718

bea wrote:I *think* that you sawyer and I could possibly be the last neutrals out there. No one else is claiming it anyway.

I can confirm you are wrong

#5719

Roxy wrote:I am neutral.

You are entitled to your opinion.

I am accusatory bc people are accusing me of lying about A - my stance of there being two nights and B - my silenceing.

Riddle me this - if there was not 2 nights why was I not silenced the first but I was the second night?

I think you are trying to set me up for lynch but it will only serve to make you look bad when I flip Neutral but by all means follow your heart.

Because, night 9 1.0 didn't happen--only night 2.0 happened. The targets from the first time didn't amount to anything because they didn't actually happen. Only the targets from the second time around counted. The night restarted. It was not that day was skipped or that there were 2 nights in a row. Day restarted.

Again, if day happened twice, why didn't we have twice the results?

I'm not saying you are necessarily bad. But I can't see a way to understand your posts without thinking you are manipulating facts.

#5720

Turnip Head wrote:
bea wrote:I *think* that you sawyer and I could possibly be the last neutrals out there. No one else is claiming it anyway.
I can confirm you are wrong

Then I am honored, sir, to finally be knowingly on a loosely based collective with you.

#5721

tranq - why did you vote the position you voted?

#5722

Turnip Head wrote:
bea wrote:I *think* that you sawyer and I could possibly be the last neutrals out there. No one else is claiming it anyway.
I can confirm you are wrong

Me too!

#5723

LoRab wrote:
Roxy wrote:I had forgot I am playing with so many perfect people.

I was silenced.
I had posted before I went to my PM's bc I am hosting and was facing 17 PM's that morning.

I cannot believe not one of you thought of that. You just immediately went to - she is being nefarious, she has a lot of explaining to do, I think she is doing it on purpose
So can you explain your entirely contradictory statements?

And did anyone else get told that they couldn't use their power on the second round of the last night?

I did not, I only got a reply to my night 9.2 pm

#5724

Sorsha wrote:
Turnip Head wrote:
bea wrote:I *think* that you sawyer and I could possibly be the last neutrals out there. No one else is claiming it anyway.
I can confirm you are wrong
Me too!

Confirmed because you know info about bea, reywas and Roxy?

#5725

Night will be over in about 20 mins, post coming soon after.

#5726

Scotty wrote:
Sorsha wrote:
Turnip Head wrote:
bea wrote:I *think* that you sawyer and I could possibly be the last neutrals out there. No one else is claiming it anyway.
I can confirm you are wrong
Me too!
Confirmed because you know info about bea, reywas and Roxy?

Noooo.... Confirming that bea is wrong about them being the only neutrals left. Because I'm not recruited either.

#5727

At this stage, I find the unrecruited claims bullshit. It's Night 10. Stop pretending that shit.

By Night 10 of RM3, recruitments were finished and no one was left unrecruited.

So get out of here with that, number one.

Number two, if you are unrecruited, you still have an allegiance.

#5728

Epignosis wrote:At this stage, I find the unrecruited claims bullshit. It's Night 10. Stop pretending that shit.

By Night 10 of RM3, recruitments were finished and no one was left unrecruited.

So get out of here with that, number one.

Number two, if you are unrecruited, you still have an allegiance.

Are you recruited, Epi?

#5729

Recruitments in this game have been completely by choice and I haven't submitted to any of the recruitment calls so no epi, you're wrong.

#5730

Sorsha wrote:
Turnip Head wrote:
bea wrote:I *think* that you sawyer and I could possibly be the last neutrals out there. No one else is claiming it anyway.
I can confirm you are wrong
Me too!

so - me, you, th, sawyer, and roxy? right? that's 5. A potential 5 person voting block who could or could not decide to be a team or not a team - or vote any wich way they want to vote

I'm not gonna lie, that's cool as shit!!

I love you hosts

sounds like the teams better start playing mafia if they want our votes..

Also from here on out. If you WANT to vote me for being uninvolved do so. But please quit hiding behind "bea must be bad she's so not involved."

Own it. Vote me for my involvement not what side you think I'm on. Cuz if you are baddie hunting with me you are either flat out wrong, or happy for the distraction. ;

llini with Sorsha but not epi - I also have not competed in a single recruitment. I'm too busy for that crap tbh. I am only here because it's the rare one night I got done early, my staff knnws I'm about to bust and I have some thinking beers.

#5731

Scotty wrote:
Epignosis wrote:At this stage, I find the unrecruited claims bullshit. It's Night 10. Stop pretending that shit.

By Night 10 of RM3, recruitments were finished and no one was left unrecruited.

So get out of here with that, number one.

Number two, if you are unrecruited, you still have an allegiance.
Are you recruited, Epi?

I'm not answering that.

Sorsha wrote:Recruitments in this game have been completely by choice and I haven't submitted to any of the recruitment calls so no epi, you're wrong.

They have?

#5732

I'm not sure I believe that everyone who is saying they are still neutral actually are. I'm just calling bullshit on epi calling bullshit.

#5733

Sorsha wrote:I'm not sure I believe that everyone who is saying they are still neutral actually are. I'm just calling bullshit on epi calling bullshit.

Then you're calling bullshit on yourself. And you're being defensive about it.

#5734

Epignosis wrote:
Scotty wrote:
Epignosis wrote:At this stage, I find the unrecruited claims bullshit. It's Night 10. Stop pretending that shit.

By Night 10 of RM3, recruitments were finished and no one was left unrecruited.

So get out of here with that, number one.

Number two, if you are unrecruited, you still have an allegiance.
Are you recruited, Epi?
I'm not answering that.

Sorsha wrote:Recruitments in this game have been completely by choice and I haven't submitted to any of the recruitment calls so no epi, you're wrong.
They have?

Well... Except for the first one I guess. The leaders submitted names for the first recruitment. But all the other ones have been asking for a story or some other submission from the player to a team.

Haven't they?

#5735

Epignosis wrote:
Sorsha wrote:I'm not sure I believe that everyone who is saying they are still neutral actually are. I'm just calling bullshit on epi calling bullshit.
Then you're calling bullshit on yourself. And you're being defensive about it.

No I'm just at saying you're wrong about there being no unrecruited neutrals out here.

#5736

Consider this:

It's recruitment Mafia.

No one submits anything for recruitment.

No one gets recruited.

Everyone but the recruiters remain unrecruited.

Boring.

That doesn't happen.

That isn't what is happening.

That isn't what has happened.

Do I need to exhaust my verb tenses here?

It's Night 10. Lines in the sand.

#5737

Sorsha wrote:
Epignosis wrote:
Sorsha wrote:I'm not sure I believe that everyone who is saying they are still neutral actually are. I'm just calling bullshit on epi calling bullshit.
Then you're calling bullshit on yourself. And you're being defensive about it.
No I'm just at saying you're wrong about there being no unrecruited neutrals out here.

I didn't say there were no unrecruited neutrals out there.

#5738

Epignosis wrote:At this stage, I find the unrecruited claims bullshit. It's Night 10. Stop pretending that shit.

By Night 10 of RM3, recruitments were finished and no one was left unrecruited.

So get out of here with that, number one.

Number two, if you are unrecruited, you still have an allegiance.

Then what are you saying here?

#5739

At this stage, I find the unrecruited claims bullshit. It's Night 10. Stop pretending that shit.

#5740

Multiple people have claimed "neutral."

I don't believe any of them.

#5741

Epignosis wrote:Consider this:

It's recruitment Mafia.

No one submits anything for recruitment.

No one gets recruited.

Everyone but the recruiters remain unrecruited.

Boring.

That doesn't happen.

That isn't what is happening.

That isn't what has happened.

Do I need to exhaust my verb tenses here?

It's Night 10. Lines in the sand.

Lol... Ok Epi. Some players obviously have been applying for the recruitments, but not everyone has. I have not. I'm sure I'm not the only one. Of course I'm playing for the civvie side though so if you want to say I'm not actually neutral then fine. I'm still unrecruited.

#5742

I can see good reason for any recruited player to claim unrecruited. Thus, it is almost pointless to discuss it.

It seems I am stifling discussion.

#5743

There are still unrecruited roles out there in their post they specifically said that neutral roles were going to be limited. In thiI kns last challenge - that if I remember correctly was supposed to go to the baddies, and it was the last recruitment opportunities that the hosts talked about.

I know I'm so very uninvolved that I've not compeleted a single thing that would recruit me to a team and no team who could have recrutied me based on my roll found me usefull enough to take.

Here's what I 100 percent know - I'm a neautral and I'm mostly drunk and it's the first time in days I've had free time to actually engage and play the game.

epi - take it for what you will.

also more linki - epi - in the win conditions there is a space for neutrals. it's in the win cons Is it really so hard to belive that thare might be a player or two or 5 who might fall into the catagory that the hosts saw potentially happening?

#5744

Sorsha wrote:
Epignosis wrote:Consider this:

It's recruitment Mafia.

No one submits anything for recruitment.

No one gets recruited.

Everyone but the recruiters remain unrecruited.

Boring.

That doesn't happen.

That isn't what is happening.

That isn't what has happened.

Do I need to exhaust my verb tenses here?

It's Night 10. Lines in the sand.
Lol... Ok Epi. Some players obviously have been applying for the recruitments, but not everyone has. I have not. I'm sure I'm not the only one. Of course I'm playing for the civvie side though so if you want to say I'm not actually neutral then fine. I'm still unrecruited.

We'll see.

#5745

Metalmarsh89 wrote:I can see good reason for any recruited player to claim unrecruited. Thus, it is almost pointless to discuss it

Agreed.

#5746

People claiming neutral:

bea
rey
Sorsha
Roxy
Turnip Head (probably)

That's five people on Night 10. If you think they are all telling the truth, you are mistaken. I will be examining these five persons in order to determine my vote.

#5747

Sorsha wrote:
Metalmarsh89 wrote:I can see good reason for any recruited player to claim unrecruited. Thus, it is almost pointless to discuss it
Agreed.

It's the same reason someone will claim to be a civilian in a normal game.

#5748

Lol... Just vote for me! I want to prove you wrong!

#5749

all I'm really saying is there is room for the unrecruitedd.It was built into the game and I am one of them. I can't say who if any of the others are that are in the same boat as me. I think that claiming it is interesting. I know that I'm willing to go on the chopping block to prove we still exist. I .on't know if any of the other unrecruited feel the same way,

#5750

bea wrote:all I'm really saying is there is room for the unrecruitedd.It was built into the game and I am one of them. I can't say who if any of the others are that are in the same boat as me. I think that claiming it is interesting. I know that I'm willing to go on the chopping block to prove we still exist. I .on't know if any of the other unrecruited feel the same way,

How's BTSC treatin' you?

Full Games	Civilian: Mafia: Independent:
Speed Games	Civilian: Fiddler on the Roof Mafia:
Heists	Civilian: MVP: RED vs BLUE
Burglaries	Independent: The Theme Is Literally a Burglary
Special Games	Civilian: Independent:

2014 Sockys
2015 Sockys
Miscellaneous

Game End!