Battlestar Galactica Mafia - GAME OVER

#3401

The other reason I am convinced Lorab is bad is that she's supposedly immune right now. She has no reason to spend her time right now telling us how much she is telling the truth, how "civ" she is, blah blah blah. She's spending her time telling us how much we need to lynch them bad guys without putting forth any effort herself. She's using her borrowed time telling us what to do instead of doing it herself. If she knows she's good, then she should be putting forth the effort to find mafia and PROVE her innocence as best she can. Instead, she's telling us we have no choice but to consider her fate the next Day.

Lorab, you are not a civilian.

Addendum: Exactly.

#3402

Epignosis wrote:The other reason I am convinced Lorab is bad is that she's supposedly immune right now. She has no reason to spend her time right now telling us how much she is telling the truth, how "civ" she is, blah blah blah. She's spending her time telling us how much we need to lynch them bad guys without putting forth any effort herself. She's using her borrowed time telling us what to do instead of doing it herself. If she knows she's good, then she should be putting forth the effort to find mafia and PROVE her innocence as best she can. Instead, she's telling us we have no choice but to consider her fate the next Day.

Lorab, you are not a civilian.

Addendum: Exactly.

I am ,though. Civ that is.

I wish people would stop talking about me.

I'm going to

vote Bea.

Her post last night in response to accusations of a slip make me believe that she is bad.

I hope to see a civ lynched tonight.

#3403

you hope to see a civ lynched tonight????

#3404

Did I just read that right or what?

#3405

The risk is that we lynch someone else instead of burning the lynch with Lorab, and that a civilian dies. The upside is that we lynch Mafia and then lynch Lorab after that. It's a risk, but I'm willing to take it.

#3406

sig wrote:you hope to see a civ lynched tonight????

LOL, I'm just drugged. I meant to say I hope to see a baddie lynched tonight. I starting saying a civ not lynched, but then changed it, and then didn't change the rest of the sentence. #whyishouldntdrinkandplay

@Epi: SO plan to have me as the top vote getter and someone you think is bad in second. There's no risk with that.

#3407

I see it could be a scum slip, but I'm not sure it is. More importantly what are you drinking and do you have enough to share with the rest of the thread?

Also I'm seriously considering voting for Glorfindel he only answered one portion of Gman's case and he seemed super defensive which I seem to remember is a baddie tell of his. However, I need to think on it since I have been wrong about him before.

Another thing which bothered me is him civ reading me. Civ Glorfindel always thinks I'm mafia or at the very least he is paranoid agaisnt me, he seemed to civ read me way to quickly this game. It could be an attempt to buddy me or just to get credit if I flipped.

#3408

Glorfindel wrote:
G-Man wrote:Finally he chastises Sokoth for finally forming some opinions because Sokoth takes aim at Glorfindel for what looks like a hasty "NO U" reaction.
Is that REALLY how you see that exchange my friend? I was chastising 'Sokoth' for precisely the opposite - I don't consider random, unsubstantiated accusations 'opinions'. I seriously doubt that anyone else here would. I AM genuinely trying to figure out this game and although I may be 'tinfoiling' for the first time I seriously think there is more to this game than the simplistic black and white view some people have adopted. Personally, I think what you've painted there is a pretty flimsy case almost rivaling the 'Two Face' accusation leveled at me in my last game here. Nonetheless, if that's the best you can do in finding a Mafia Team member, good for you.

One thing that has concerned me for some time time now is my initial exchange with IAWY. As I stated in the Sign-up thread, he was the reason I even signed up for this game. In the last game we played together, I defended him from the 'get go'. Given our history together, I find it extraordinary that he would make an accusation against me Day 1 like he did. After Dr Wilgy replaced him, gave him the benefit of the doubt and have heard practically nothing since. Then there was the exchange between IAWY and Magnus (Nerolunar). In retrospect, the whole 'No, you!' exchange doesn't really look as convincing as it did at the time. Distancing, perhaps...

Admittedly, by the time I got to the NO U I was feeling pretty cynical toward you. It happens when you case somebody. There's a point of no return in regards of suspecting someone. Once you cross that point you read them like a baddie no matter what the say. That's where I was with you at that point.

#3409

sig wrote:I see it could be a scum slip, but I'm not sure it is. More importantly what are you drinking and do you have enough to share with the rest of the thread?

Prescription stuff and a glass or 2 of wine.

#3410

Glorf what about the rest of his post about you? Also could I get a few quick reads?

linki: Wine is good, but I have school tomorrow so no thanks. :P
However, upon further consideration I don't think

#3411

*what you said was a scum slip.

#3412

I don't think discussion with Lorab is a priority right now.

#3413

True, but if her wording was a slip then we could've almost lock cleared Bea, who she was slightly pushing for.

What do you think of Glorfidnel?

#3414

Glorfindel, have you finished your response to G-Man? He had a lot of points.

#3415

sig wrote:Also I'm seriously considering voting for Glorfindel he only answered one portion of Gman's case and he seemed super defensive which I seem to remember is a baddie tell of his. However, I need to think on it since I have been wrong about him before.

Another thing which bothered me is him civ reading me. Civ Glorfindel always thinks I'm mafia or at the very least he is paranoid agaisnt me, he seemed to civ read me way to quickly this game. It could be an attempt to buddy me or just to get credit if I flipped.

Sig, G-Man's post was quit extensive but without a lot of content that I feel I can adequately address in the short time I have at my disposal (I am actually at work...)

I am not super defensive at all. Someone actually goes to the trouble of putting a case together against me (even though he's wrong, I appreciate his effort - seems it's beyond some players here...) and I'm asked to refute those claims. I do, and you accuse me of being super-defensive? REALLY?

Yes, I believe you're Town, There, said it. I don't see you're problem with that opinion. I'd never 'buddy you' and if you honestly believe that...

After all this time, if I don't know Town Sig by now... I don't see your problem - unless I'm wrong about you?

#3416

That also answered my question.

#3417

Alright, well, I still feel pretty good about my Glorfindel case and I will most likely vote for him. That law is making this a frustrating lynch. Best case scenario if LoRab isn't a Toaster is that she's the secret role and has some kind of anti-town angle and she gets lynched. If she's just a civvie and bluffing, then we could be in for a whole lot of suck depending on her role.

#3418

Epignosis who are you leaning toward for a vote tonight? And why unless you've already said.

#3419

juliets wrote:Epignosis who are you leaning toward for a vote tonight? And why unless you've already said.

I have not. I had to host. I'm going to take five and then make that decision.

#3420

Epignosis wrote:
juliets wrote:Epignosis who are you leaning toward for a vote tonight? And why unless you've already said.
I have not. I had to host. I'm going to take five and then make that decision.

ok thanks.

#3421

VOTE: NeroLunar

#3422

ObscureAllure wrote:VOTE: NeroLunar

This tells me you are not interested in recent revelations, and therefore are content to spread the votes further, when the no-lynch is seven long.

#3423

Epignosis wrote:
ObscureAllure wrote:VOTE: NeroLunar

This tells me you are not interested in recent revelations, and therefore are content to spread the votes further, when the no-lynch is seven long.

#3424

ObscureAllure wrote:
Epignosis wrote:
ObscureAllure wrote:VOTE: NeroLunar

This tells me you are not interested in recent revelations, and therefore are content to spread the votes further, when the no-lynch is seven long.

Oh right.

#3425

Epignosis wrote:
ObscureAllure wrote:
Epignosis wrote:
ObscureAllure wrote:VOTE: NeroLunar

This tells me you are not interested in recent revelations, and therefore are content to spread the votes further, when the no-lynch is seven long.

Oh right.

#3426

If Lorab is bad with BTSC, and she knew she could claim "Sanctuary!"

How does that make you feel about these persons?

Polo (10), a2thezebra (11), Vompatti (12), Ricochet (13), S~V~S (14), DFaraday (15), JaggedJimmyJay (16)

#3427

That's to anybody.

#3428

I feel better about them, because obviously, she would prefer not to have to do it at all. Claiming you are a cylon is a last ditch resort.

#3429

So teammates would be asked to hold their votes is possible. And we have a lot of voteholders in this room

#3430

Epignosis wrote:If Lorab is bad with BTSC, and she knew she could claim "Sanctuary!"

How does that make you feel about these persons?

Polo (10) , a2thezebra (11) , Vompatti (12), Ricochet (13), S~V~S (14) , DFaraday (15) , JaggedJimmyJay (16)

NeroLunar

S~V~S wrote:I feel better about them, because obviously, she would prefer not to have to do it at all. Claiming you are a cylon is a last ditch resort.

#3431

It's true, OA.

#3432

S~V~S wrote:I feel better about them, because obviously, she would prefer not to have to do it at all. Claiming you are a cylon is a last ditch resort.

One or more of them voting a teammate who is about to claim Cylon, and you feel better about them....you see there this goes down the black rabbit hole.

#3433

Epignosis wrote:
S~V~S wrote:I feel better about them, because obviously, she would prefer not to have to do it at all. Claiming you are a cylon is a last ditch resort.
One or more of them voting a teammate who is about to claim Cylon, and you feel better about them....you see there this goes down the black rabbit hole.

No, not really. Because someone would say what you are saying. I know I would not in a million years vote for a teammate about to role claim baddie. I would vote some tangent vote, or hold my vote until after she did it.

#3434

So would you, I am sure

#3435

#3436

But that doesn't make it untrue.You would do that too, OA.

#3437

I think at least one of those voters are a baddie cylon. However, it isn't enough to vote on.

#3438

Polo (10), a2thezebra (11), Vompatti (12), Ricochet (13), S~V~S (14), DFaraday (15), JaggedJimmyJay (16)

That looks pretty good to me.

#3439

I don't like OA's vote why did she go rouge and do that? It seems like a bad move at this time.

How about Zebra? She's been off to me all game and she came out looking worse from her interaction with 3J

#3440

This is quite exciting, everyone just want to leave it up to chance, assuming Lorab's claim of being a Cylon is true? By that I mean it's a big fat six-player tie right now.

#3441

S~V~S wrote:But that doesn't make it untrue.You would do that too, OA.

Long Con wrote:Polo (10), a2thezebra (11), Vompatti (12), Ricochet (13), S~V~S (14), DFaraday (15), JaggedJimmyJay (16)

That looks pretty good to me.

#3442

Epignosis wrote:If Lorab is bad with BTSC, and she knew she could claim "Sanctuary!"

How does that make you feel about these persons?

Polo (10), a2thezebra (11), Vompatti (12), Ricochet (13), S~V~S (14), DFaraday (15), JaggedJimmyJay (16)

I feel fine with Zebs, and Jimmy. I think Polo, Ricochet and S-V-S are alright. Jury is still out on DFaraday and Vompatti.

#3443

Actually, I don't think that ANY smart player in those circumstances would vote for their teammate. Would ANY of you do that?

I didn't think so.

Linki, of course it does, LC. That is a list of civvies up there, LC. Every single one, in my opinion. And I think you know it,too.

#3444

sig wrote:I don't like OA's vote why did she go rouge and do that? It seems like a bad move at this time.

How about Zebra? She's been off to me all game and she came out looking worse from her interaction with 3J

#3445

Bea, DrWilgy, Nerolunar, Ricochet, S~V~S, sig

A second vote for any of these folks could doom them. Or make them admit to being a Cylon. Come one, folks, let's make something happen NOW, not five minutes before deadline.

ONE person vote someone, and they will be squeezed.

#3446

Glorfindel wrote:
Epignosis wrote:If Lorab is bad with BTSC, and she knew she could claim "Sanctuary!"

How does that make you feel about these persons?

Polo (10), a2thezebra (11), Vompatti (12), Ricochet (13), S~V~S (14), DFaraday (15), JaggedJimmyJay (16)
I feel fine with Zebs, and Jimmy. I think Polo, Ricochet and S-V-S are alright. Jury is still out on DFaraday and Vompatti.

You just named the easiest two players to lynch.

#3447

Long Con wrote:Bea, DrWilgy, Nerolunar, Ricochet, S~V~S, sig

A second vote for any of these folks could doom them. Or make them admit to being a Cylon. Come one, folks, let's make something happen NOW, not five minutes before deadline.

ONE person vote someone, and they will be squeezed.

I don't want to help you until you help me.

#3448

Is Lorab going to claim Cylon?

By the way, I am a Cylon. Who wants to claim with me?

#3449

Epignosis wrote:
Long Con wrote:Bea, DrWilgy, Nerolunar, Ricochet, S~V~S, sig

A second vote for any of these folks could doom them. Or make them admit to being a Cylon. Come one, folks, let's make something happen NOW, not five minutes before deadline.

ONE person vote someone, and they will be squeezed.
I don't want to help you until you help me.

Don't start that again, I'm not playing that game with you, Cylon.

#3450

S~V~S wrote:Actually, I don't think that ANY smart player in those circumstances would vote for their teammate. Would ANY of you do that?

I didn't think so.

Linki, of course it does, LC. That is a list of civvies up there, LC. Every single one, in my opinion. And I think you know it,too.

Epignosis wrote:If Lorab is bad with BTSC, and she knew she could claim "Sanctuary!"

Epignosis wrote:One or more of them voting a teammate who is about to claim Cylon

Full Games	Civilian: Mafia: Independent:
Speed Games	Civilian: Fiddler on the Roof Mafia:
Heists	Civilian: MVP: RED vs BLUE
Burglaries	Independent: The Theme Is Literally a Burglary
Special Games	Civilian: Independent:

2014 Sockys
2015 Sockys
Miscellaneous

Who be you lynching today?