G-Man's voting record:
Day 1 - Marmot
Day 2 - nutella
Day 3 - Glorfindel
Day 4 - No vote
Day 5 - Glorfindel
Day 6 - Glorfindel
Day 7 - Glorfindel
Day 8 - DrumBeats
Day 9 - S~V~S
Day 10 - Dex
Day 11 - Spacedaisy
I'm not concerned with the timing of votes. I will look back into every single day here and decide whether G-Man's vote was the result of fair deliberation and consideration, or simply a "default" vote.
Day 1 - Marmot
The following content relates to Marmot:
G-Man wrote:Metalmarsh89 seemed initially silly but that Epi vote out of nowhere for no reason has me scratching my head. His posts haven't bore much substance but I feel like that's not out of the ordinary for him. That barking marmot gif he posted felt a little passive-aggressive though.
G-Man wrote:Alright you guys are posting too fast for me to catch up. I'm only back up to page 22 and it's bedtime. The only thing that still has me feeling uneasy is MM because I'm reading in a hurry and almost nothing is sinking in. I'm sorry that this vote is probably lame and wrong but I have to vote somewhere.
vote: Marmot
Oh good grief the wall of linki!
In his oft-criticized list of notes, he was barely critical of MM but also granted that MM's behavior wasn't out of the ordinary. I could say his assessments of LoRab and Matt were more "negative" by the standards of neutral note-taking. This is the definition of a default vote.
Day 2 - nutella
"Lazy Rotten Debra Vibes
This is G-Man's first acknowledgment of nutella's existence in the game, on Day 2, save for one moment of off-topic banter. It came after my case when the thread climate for nutella was quickly worsening. This criticism is vague. I don't like that he didn't refer to anything specific, like perhaps something from my case or something different he observed. Instead it's just "Lazy Rotten Debra".
G-Man wrote:As for Glorfindel, he's my Lazy Rotten Debra of the game so far. He's made
13 posts and a few of them are of the "catching up
" variety. He posts a few civvie vibes, agrees with a lot of other people's thoughts, gets sidetracked into lore/mechanics discussions, and tells us who he won't vote for. What's missing is independent thought and any mention of his own suspicions. That's almost exactly what Debra did in Biblical Mafia, hence the term Lazy Rotten Debra.
linki: Indiglo, I can take the 11:49 a.m. again tomorrow if you need someone
His meaning for that term can be observed here -- basically any typical low-content player who is struggling to keep up. So that he ended up sticking this label on nutella after my case strikes me as a curiosity, since I don't think nutella even fit that description. There were more substantial reasons to suspect her, and this looks cooked to me.
Days 3 through 7 - Glorfindel 4 out of 5 times
There are a ton of posts, I'll only reference those that interest me.
G-Man wrote:#26- Glorfindel votes last and bring LC within one, opening the reults up to shenanigans if certain roles are in play.
He gave Glorfindel crap for "opening the results up to shenanigans" during the nutella lynch -- there
were no shenanigans. I don't understand this mindset.
Larger case against Glorfindel on Day 3
A lot of this is observational more than drawing conclusions, and verbose expressions of "he hasn't provided a lot of content".
Expanded case on Day 5
Gripes that Glorfindel didn't address his concerns adequately, continues to accuse him of posting fluff. This isn't terribly different from the general criticism Glorfindel faced from a number of other people, so whatever.
The worst thing about his Glorfindel votes is probably that there were so many of them -- it was a narrow tunnel he squeezed himself into. He did speak of other players during this period, but he never strayed from pursuing this lynch. It ended up being a mislynch. Eh.
I'll also stick this here, his reaction to the Glorfindel lynch and Boomer flip:
G-Man wrote:Awesome night! I was right about Glorfindel, plus the Penguins and Warriors won.
(modkill me if you must, Golden the Coward 
but Curry4Life!)
I've got to do some reading and thinking today because my player reads aren't all what they were last time I posted lists.
Day 8 - DrumBeats
G-Man wrote:And now for DrumBeats' votes:
Day 1 he votes mid-pack for Rico. Consistent with his Day 1 suspicion of Rico. Day 1 is still too spread out for me to make anything of it.
Day 2 vote comes next to last overall and isn't necessary to seal the deal on her lynch. It is at least consistent with his suspicion of her but I thought his suspicions were soft.
Day 3 is that Nero vote.
Day 4 he is the first to vote overall and votes for the obvious target: LoRab. Eager to attone for his Day 3?
Day 5 he misses the vote. Was he being punished or was it a miss? I can't recall just now.
Day 6 is when he nearly repeats his Day 3 by voting sig.
Day 7 is another miss. He was in the brig.
That's three missing votes out of seven. The remaining votes look suspect in varying degrees and they aren't helped by the absence of other votes that could make him look better.
The vote is almost entirely based on DB's voting record. The worst criticisms G-Man seemed to have for that voting record was missed votes.
Day 9 - S~V~S
Calls her a "bad" read at the Admiral's orders.
He ended up voting for her purely on the basis that we shouldn't be voting for Epignosis. Earlier in the game he had been reading her as a townie, and that started to change on Day 3:
G-Man wrote:Matt wrote:Snap. I'm not gonna wait.
S~V~S
She makes less sense then I do, and that's cause for concern.
Although I still have her on my Possible Civvie list, S~V~S is hanging onto that spot by a thread. She gave me good vibes because of the pressure she put on me early because it felt the same as in Spirited Away. In that game though, she kept the pressure on me beyond my first set of reads. There hasn't been the same kind of follow-up this time but I'm also not posting in haikus like I did during Spirited Away.
I saw some of your posts and maybe someone else's touching on her earlier. Since she was on my Possible Civvie list at the time, the issue of her wasn't on my radar. Can you give me a post or two to use as a starting point? I'll try to look her over once I finish my hunch on Glorfindel.
The highlighted portion is a little yikes at face value. Generally I do think his interactions with S~V~S are the best thing going for him, but it's not clear cut. If he's bad then both of them showed a bus-first mentality for most of the game. I don't care about his vote for her though, that means nothing to me.
Day 10 - Dex
G-Man wrote:Dex wrote:Dex wrote:SO SAY WE ALL!
#1
SUSPECTS JOHN CAVIL
For my own part, I doubt that a vote for Cavil will do anything more than to buy him more time. I have to agree that a focus on the 4ofF5 is our most productive approach, even though that includes me. If we have to eliminate Cavil's team to get to Cavil, one or two of them are there, and that's a small pool of suspects to search.
Nero's throwing S~V~S to the brig is behaviorally positive civ cred, albeit very easy. If I was nero and mafia, I'd do the same. Meanwhile, Julliettes has chosen to pursue some arcane issue with Sok that seems rather beside the point. SpaceDaisy seems to be mostly lurking. There is little left to go by than reads, and I'm terrible at reads.
I find it ironic, though, that I have spent the entire game trying to defend civ cylons, only to find myself in their very predicament.
Trust you before resurrection I did but a question I have. Why in quotes is your post? Suspicious this looks. Yes, suspicious. As if in another thread you wrote it once before and for posting here copied it you did.
Broken my ice bag has. Peed the couch my wife will think when home she returns. Ooh hee hee hee!
Ehhhhhhh.
Day 11 - Spacedaisy
G-Man wrote:2) Juliets voted sideways for Sokoth Day 9, which I wasn't crazy about but at least she voted for someone I'm suspicious of. I want her to be civ because she's Hot Dog. If she's civ, Cavil can't risk NK'ing her without potentially killing one of his minions. For that reason I say juliets is civ. I think Nero is civ as well because he put Cavil in the brig. Night 9 was the time for him to screw the civs over and make himself an easy target if he was going to. Cavil would have killed someone and we'd have lost a day to little discussion as we lynched Nero. Spacedaisy seems like she's trying to fit in, which is what a baddie Final Fiver would do. I'll double check her posts but her thoughts and opinions have felt soft since she rezzed. Baddie on her.
Ehhhhhhh.
G-Man wrote:At a farewell picnic for our pastor. Be back later for discussion.
If we decide to vote for a Final Five, I'd vote Spacedaisy. If we're voting on general suspicions, I'd keep Drum and Sokoth in the mix. Having a good day pain-wise. I ought to be able to spend some time at the computer this afternoon and update technicolors and go over the votes and why I think vote records clear some and implicate others.
I won't vote Epi. I need to read up on the Wilgy argument. Still not leaning his way but I'll see what his votes tell me.
@sig- why am I on your list?
Now his eventual Spacedaisy vote is based purely on her being a Final Fiver, not on "general suspicions". "She's trying to fit in" strikes me as a general suspicion.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
G-Man, this does you no favors. I suspect you more than before.
[-Mass Effect Mafia banner-]
