DrWilgy and jack both snuck in with votes on SVS. That's interesting.
Jack would get no credit if he voted on the lynch of a mafia member. He doesn't have a lot to gain by putting his vote there if SVS is his teammate, especially to tie the lynch the way it is.
But hey, the day isn't over yet, things could happen.
Marmot wrote:Oh, and of course, WIFOM is a thing here, and the true enemy of the state.
I agree that SVS has had strange behavior this game. I still think we should lynch the confirmed baddie though.
Epignosis wrote:If llama is good, it means we exist in a universe in which multitasking llama can call out the first of two mafia while simultaneously calling out two civilians.
Epignosis wrote:If llama is good, it means we exist in a universe in which multitasking llama can call out the first of two mafia while simultaneously calling out two civilians.
Baddies are JoH, SVS/DF, Quin/Sawyer, and llamotnosis.
Linki - Marmot my vote wasn't sneaky! I stated so in the chat. SVS is a better option to Jack, but I have my doubts on this one. I feel that Baddie SVS generally goes harder than what we see here but I could be wrong. I skimmed her ISO and I found that she had no strong suspicions/jack interactions and I'm semi-justifying my vote to myself that way. Besides, I don't believe SVS and DF are ok n the same team. If SVS flips civilian I can lynch DF w/o second thought.
nutella wrote: ↑Wed Feb 21, 2018 2:56 pm
@DrWilgy don't post any more k
JaggedJimmyJay wrote:Wilgy's vote is an enigma of science. Philosophers are known to throw their tomes across the auditorium in a fit of frustration after failing to solve its mystery.
insertnamehere wrote: ↑Wed Jun 28, 2017 11:50 pm
WTF was up with Wilgy's entire deal?
JaggedJimmyJay wrote:Wilgy's vote is an enigma of science. Philosophers are known to throw their tomes across the auditorium in a fit of frustration after failing to solve its mystery.
insertnamehere wrote: ↑Wed Jun 28, 2017 11:50 pm
WTF was up with Wilgy's entire deal?
JaggedJimmyJay wrote:Wilgy's vote is an enigma of science. Philosophers are known to throw their tomes across the auditorium in a fit of frustration after failing to solve its mystery.
insertnamehere wrote: ↑Wed Jun 28, 2017 11:50 pm
WTF was up with Wilgy's entire deal?
Marmot wrote:DrWilgy and jack both snuck in with votes on SVS. That's interesting.
Jack would get no credit if he voted on the lynch of a mafia member. He doesn't have a lot to gain by putting his vote there if SVS is his teammate, especially to tie the lynch the way it is.
But hey, the day isn't over yet, things could happen.
Sure he does, he makes it look like he's cool with lynching her. If she's his teammate, that WIFOMy bluffery can definitely be a gain.
Marmot wrote:DrWilgy and jack both snuck in with votes on SVS. That's interesting.
Jack would get no credit if he voted on the lynch of a mafia member. He doesn't have a lot to gain by putting his vote there if SVS is his teammate, especially to tie the lynch the way it is.
But hey, the day isn't over yet, things could happen.
Sure he does, he makes it look like he's cool with lynching her. If she's his teammate, that WIFOMy bluffery can definitely be a gain.
I don't care where Jack votes. I'm not reading into it one way or another. However, I would encourage the civilians to ensure that there is enough of a difference that his vote doesn't matter. Remember:
G-Man wrote:5) A tied lynch will result in no lynch. Votes matter.
FZ. wrote:Hmm, at the risk of playing the devil's advocate, I don't think the fact SVS celebrated first and then asked about the alignments necessarily makes her bad. You come in, you skim the results, see it's not a civ, and also that there is something going on and the others' posts look like something good happened, so you celebrate. Only then do you actually dive into the results.
The part where SVS doesn't really give any suspects or tries to hunt for them makes me much more worried than the thing mentioned above, though. She claims that it just annoys her that we're not voting Jack, but why not discuss things in the meantime anyway?
I always expect baddies to do a better job and look like they are actually hunting, so I don't like to lynch those not trying hard enough, because it seems too easy. But playing on this site has taught me that plenty of baddies don't try hard enough, so I don't know. Maybe SVS is not in the mood to play that much and didn't like getting to be a baddie.
If there's anything giving me pause, it's this.
Does anyone have any reason to believe S~V~S is a civilian?
DrWilgy wrote: Besides, I don't believe SVS and DF are ok n the same team. If SVS flips civilian I can lynch DF w/o second thought.
What gives you that impression?
Just DF's interaction with SVS.
DrWilgy wrote:Baddies are JoH, SVS/DF, Quin/Sawyer, and llamotnosis.
Linki - Marmot my vote wasn't sneaky! I stated so in the chat. SVS is a better option to Jack, but I have my doubts on this one. I feel that Baddie SVS generally goes harder than what we see here but I could be wrong. I skimmed her ISO and I found that she had no strong suspicions/jack interactions and I'm semi-justifying my vote to myself that way. Besides, I don't believe SVS and DF are ok n the same team. If SVS flips civilian I can lynch DF w/o second thought.
I need you to elaborate on this. What's the connection?
FZ. wrote:Hmm, at the risk of playing the devil's advocate, I don't think the fact SVS celebrated first and then asked about the alignments necessarily makes her bad. You come in, you skim the results, see it's not a civ, and also that there is something going on and the others' posts look like something good happened, so you celebrate. Only then do you actually dive into the results.
The part where SVS doesn't really give any suspects or tries to hunt for them makes me much more worried than the thing mentioned above, though. She claims that it just annoys her that we're not voting Jack, but why not discuss things in the meantime anyway?
I always expect baddies to do a better job and look like they are actually hunting, so I don't like to lynch those not trying hard enough, because it seems too easy. But playing on this site has taught me that plenty of baddies don't try hard enough, so I don't know. Maybe SVS is not in the mood to play that much and didn't like getting to be a baddie.
If there's anything giving me pause, it's this.
Does anyone have any reason to believe S~V~S is a civilian?
FZ. wrote:Hmm, at the risk of playing the devil's advocate, I don't think the fact SVS celebrated first and then asked about the alignments necessarily makes her bad. You come in, you skim the results, see it's not a civ, and also that there is something going on and the others' posts look like something good happened, so you celebrate. Only then do you actually dive into the results.
The part where SVS doesn't really give any suspects or tries to hunt for them makes me much more worried than the thing mentioned above, though. She claims that it just annoys her that we're not voting Jack, but why not discuss things in the meantime anyway?
I always expect baddies to do a better job and look like they are actually hunting, so I don't like to lynch those not trying hard enough, because it seems too easy. But playing on this site has taught me that plenty of baddies don't try hard enough, so I don't know. Maybe SVS is not in the mood to play that much and didn't like getting to be a baddie.
If there's anything giving me pause, it's this.
Does anyone have any reason to believe S~V~S is a civilian?
I also have to say not really.
Not really.
Epignosis wrote:If llama is good, it means we exist in a universe in which multitasking llama can call out the first of two mafia while simultaneously calling out two civilians.
Epignosis wrote:If llama is good, it means we exist in a universe in which multitasking llama can call out the first of two mafia while simultaneously calling out two civilians.
DrWilgy wrote: Besides, I don't believe SVS and DF are ok n the same team. If SVS flips civilian I can lynch DF w/o second thought.
What gives you that impression?
Just DF's interaction with SVS.
DrWilgy wrote:Baddies are JoH, SVS/DF, Quin/Sawyer, and llamotnosis.
Linki - Marmot my vote wasn't sneaky! I stated so in the chat. SVS is a better option to Jack, but I have my doubts on this one. I feel that Baddie SVS generally goes harder than what we see here but I could be wrong. I skimmed her ISO and I found that she had no strong suspicions/jack interactions and I'm semi-justifying my vote to myself that way. Besides, I don't believe SVS and DF are ok n the same team. If SVS flips civilian I can lynch DF w/o second thought.
I need you to elaborate on this. What's the connection?
I don't consider DF's interactipn with SVS to be that of two who are on a team, yet I'm suspicious of both of them for similar reasons. I'm proably wrong on 1 and right on the other.
nutella wrote: ↑Wed Feb 21, 2018 2:56 pm
@DrWilgy don't post any more k
JaggedJimmyJay wrote:Wilgy's vote is an enigma of science. Philosophers are known to throw their tomes across the auditorium in a fit of frustration after failing to solve its mystery.
insertnamehere wrote: ↑Wed Jun 28, 2017 11:50 pm
WTF was up with Wilgy's entire deal?
DrWilgy wrote: Besides, I don't believe SVS and DF are ok n the same team. If SVS flips civilian I can lynch DF w/o second thought.
What gives you that impression?
Just DF's interaction with SVS.
DrWilgy wrote:Baddies are JoH, SVS/DF, Quin/Sawyer, and llamotnosis.
Linki - Marmot my vote wasn't sneaky! I stated so in the chat. SVS is a better option to Jack, but I have my doubts on this one. I feel that Baddie SVS generally goes harder than what we see here but I could be wrong. I skimmed her ISO and I found that she had no strong suspicions/jack interactions and I'm semi-justifying my vote to myself that way. Besides, I don't believe SVS and DF are ok n the same team. If SVS flips civilian I can lynch DF w/o second thought.
I need you to elaborate on this. What's the connection?
I don't consider DF's interactipn with SVS to be that of two who are on a team, yet I'm suspicious of both of them for similar reasons. I'm proably wrong on 1 and right on the other.
DrWilgy wrote: Besides, I don't believe SVS and DF are ok n the same team. If SVS flips civilian I can lynch DF w/o second thought.
What gives you that impression?
Just DF's interaction with SVS.
DrWilgy wrote:Baddies are JoH, SVS/DF, Quin/Sawyer, and llamotnosis.
Linki - Marmot my vote wasn't sneaky! I stated so in the chat. SVS is a better option to Jack, but I have my doubts on this one. I feel that Baddie SVS generally goes harder than what we see here but I could be wrong. I skimmed her ISO and I found that she had no strong suspicions/jack interactions and I'm semi-justifying my vote to myself that way. Besides, I don't believe SVS and DF are ok n the same team. If SVS flips civilian I can lynch DF w/o second thought.
I need you to elaborate on this. What's the connection?
I don't consider DF's interactipn with SVS to be that of two who are on a team, yet I'm suspicious of both of them for similar reasons. I'm proably wrong on 1 and right on the other.
Why is that more probable than wrong on both?
Simply because I want to be right.
nutella wrote: ↑Wed Feb 21, 2018 2:56 pm
@DrWilgy don't post any more k
JaggedJimmyJay wrote:Wilgy's vote is an enigma of science. Philosophers are known to throw their tomes across the auditorium in a fit of frustration after failing to solve its mystery.
insertnamehere wrote: ↑Wed Jun 28, 2017 11:50 pm
WTF was up with Wilgy's entire deal?
While I think SVS is Mafia and ordinarily would vote for her I KNOW Jack is and voting for him today seems a better idea to me. Cool we managed to find a great day 3 lynch candidate already but how can we truly justify lynching SVS before Jack?
FZ. wrote:Hmm, at the risk of playing the devil's advocate, I don't think the fact SVS celebrated first and then asked about the alignments necessarily makes her bad. You come in, you skim the results, see it's not a civ, and also that there is something going on and the others' posts look like something good happened, so you celebrate. Only then do you actually dive into the results.
The part where SVS doesn't really give any suspects or tries to hunt for them makes me much more worried than the thing mentioned above, though. She claims that it just annoys her that we're not voting Jack, but why not discuss things in the meantime anyway?
I always expect baddies to do a better job and look like they are actually hunting, so I don't like to lynch those not trying hard enough, because it seems too easy. But playing on this site has taught me that plenty of baddies don't try hard enough, so I don't know. Maybe SVS is not in the mood to play that much and didn't like getting to be a baddie.
If there's anything giving me pause, it's this.
Does anyone have any reason to believe S~V~S is a civilian?
You've played with her more than I have. How many times have you seen her as a baddie not trying to look like she's looking for baddies?
I have to agree with Wilgy on DF and SVS not being together. It felt like he had absolutely no problem voting her. At this stage, I would try harder to lynch a civ and not one of my own. And he could easily go with the Jack option if all of them were bad.
MacDougall wrote:While I think SVS is Mafia and ordinarily would vote for her I KNOW Jack is and voting for him today seems a better idea to me. Cool we managed to find a great day 3 lynch candidate already but how can we truly justify lynching SVS before Jack?
MacDougall wrote:While I think SVS is Mafia and ordinarily would vote for her I KNOW Jack is and voting for him today seems a better idea to me. Cool we managed to find a great day 3 lynch candidate already but how can we truly justify lynching SVS before Jack?
How is that suspicious? Also answer my question. You aren't even a civ read of mine so I'm super interested in how you can justify your wagon creation here as well as this arrogant single smiley post response to a very fair question. The vote is too close now to not lynch Jack.
JaggedJimmyJay wrote:Wilgy's vote is an enigma of science. Philosophers are known to throw their tomes across the auditorium in a fit of frustration after failing to solve its mystery.
insertnamehere wrote: ↑Wed Jun 28, 2017 11:50 pm
WTF was up with Wilgy's entire deal?
GREG: Thank you for watching the Greg Gutfeld Show this crazy Sunday evening, folks. The burning question of the night is this: can the Clinton Administration possibly do anything right? I mean, my God, it's the second full day that she's been President and it's been one embarrassing disaster after another. WikiLeaks, the inauguration video, secret power grab documents- have we ever had such a disastrous start to a Presidency?
And now today, it looks like it's all repeating itself. Not long after the Clinton Administration held a press conference and blamed Russia for the shocking video of Pamela Brown- who nobody know the whereabouts of I might add- Florida Congresswoman and disgraced ex-DNC chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz showed up at FBI headquarters and confessed to being involved with this Operation Cobalt mission designed to sabotage the Trump campaign. Schultz looked ragged, like she hadn't eaten or slept in a couple of days, and begged for protective custody. God only knows what's going to come from this but if the ex-DNC chair, who was in charge of the DNC while this secret operation was underway, was part of this conspiracy, is it such a stretch to assume that Hillary Clinton might have known about this?
And now you've got someone leaking information out of the White House. I don't know if it's a whistle-blower or just a pissed off employee, but dear Lord is this a bombshell. Last Fall, Julian Assange promised to dish out some dirt on Clinton. The morning of the inauguration, he does, by way of the Podesta emails. The next day, Assange dies in a freak explosion. Today, documents were leaked showing that Hillary Clinton's Vice President, Tim Kaine, ordered a stealth drone strike on the Ecuadorian embassy in London to take Assange out. He's the Vice President! He doesn't have the authority to make that call. Either someone with real power made the final decision (and there's only one person higher on in the food chain) or Kaine is guilty of an insane level of overreach.
Is Hillary Clinton's presidency already in a death spiral? If not, what on earth could happen next?
JaggedJimmyJay wrote:Wilgy's vote is an enigma of science. Philosophers are known to throw their tomes across the auditorium in a fit of frustration after failing to solve its mystery.
insertnamehere wrote: ↑Wed Jun 28, 2017 11:50 pm
WTF was up with Wilgy's entire deal?