Make a donation to a charity of your choice and you can be my Supreme Leader instead.

Moderator: Community Team
Will you lynch him with me tomorrow then? It's my last chance.Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Sat Nov 04, 2017 7:54 pm It's DDL. The embargo happened the night after he spawned on the 5s floated stopping the primes.
Yes.Long Con wrote: ↑Sat Nov 04, 2017 8:13 pmWill you lynch him with me tomorrow then? It's my last chance.Jackofhearts2005 wrote: ↑Sat Nov 04, 2017 7:54 pm It's DDL. The embargo happened the night after he spawned on the 5s floated stopping the primes.
What DID you expect it to look like?
Uh from the in thread chatter I thought DDL killed LC. But apparently not.
Very much so.
I'm made of candy.
Funny thing is, at least in my experience, a team could have more players on it than are in the chat.sig wrote: ↑Sun Nov 05, 2017 3:55 pm So just going to throw this out there but if we all don't want to be total asses to each other, I suggest we lynch the inactive players starting phase 2. I'd say we should also kill them, but I doubt many players will agree to that. And keep in mind this suggestion could very well hurt my current team and almost everyone except for the primes.
Players who haven't posted in like forever, if they don't have any posts in say the last 72+ hours they're inactive for sure, I'd say even in the last 36 hours unless they specify in thread they're busy. This is imo, just a way to trim the fat and get ride of the players who aren't even playing the game. Plus its more polite then lynching people who are active and want to win and leaving alive people who are inactive and don't want to win for longer.
Please take into consideration that I am still in the hospital and kind of out of it a lot of the time leaving it difficult for me to concentrate. I do not mean to be inactive it's just my situation is a little difficult. The past 48 hours have been particularly hard. I'm very interested in playing this through to the end. It looks like I will be leaving the hospital early in the week and I'm hopeful I will be more available.sig wrote: ↑Sun Nov 05, 2017 4:54 pmPlayers who haven't posted in like forever, if they don't have any posts in say the last 72+ hours they're inactive for sure, I'd say even in the last 36 hours unless they specify in thread they're busy. This is imo, just a way to trim the fat and get ride of the players who aren't even playing the game. Plus its more polite then lynching people who are active and want to win and leaving alive people who are inactive and don't want to win for longer.
That is understandable.juliets wrote: ↑Sun Nov 05, 2017 5:04 pmPlease take into consideration that I am still in the hospital and kind of out of it a lot of the time leaving it difficult for me to concentrate. I do not mean to be inactive it's just my situation is a little difficult. The past 48 hours have been particularly hard. I'm very interested in playing this through to the end. It looks like I will be leaving the hospital early in the week and I'm hopeful I will be more available.sig wrote: ↑Sun Nov 05, 2017 4:54 pmPlayers who haven't posted in like forever, if they don't have any posts in say the last 72+ hours they're inactive for sure, I'd say even in the last 36 hours unless they specify in thread they're busy. This is imo, just a way to trim the fat and get ride of the players who aren't even playing the game. Plus its more polite then lynching people who are active and want to win and leaving alive people who are inactive and don't want to win for longer.
How about fuck politeness?sig wrote: ↑Sun Nov 05, 2017 4:54 pmPlayers who haven't posted in like forever, if they don't have any posts in say the last 72+ hours they're inactive for sure, I'd say even in the last 36 hours unless they specify in thread they're busy. This is imo, just a way to trim the fat and get ride of the players who aren't even playing the game. Plus its more polite then lynching people who are active and want to win and leaving alive people who are inactive and don't want to win for longer.
I haven't decided yet what strategy is best for me for Stage 2. I'll be considering different options.Ricochet wrote: ↑Sun Nov 05, 2017 5:20 pmThat is understandable.juliets wrote: ↑Sun Nov 05, 2017 5:04 pmPlease take into consideration that I am still in the hospital and kind of out of it a lot of the time leaving it difficult for me to concentrate. I do not mean to be inactive it's just my situation is a little difficult. The past 48 hours have been particularly hard. I'm very interested in playing this through to the end. It looks like I will be leaving the hospital early in the week and I'm hopeful I will be more available.sig wrote: ↑Sun Nov 05, 2017 4:54 pmPlayers who haven't posted in like forever, if they don't have any posts in say the last 72+ hours they're inactive for sure, I'd say even in the last 36 hours unless they specify in thread they're busy. This is imo, just a way to trim the fat and get ride of the players who aren't even playing the game. Plus its more polite then lynching people who are active and want to win and leaving alive people who are inactive and don't want to win for longer.
We can always stick to the plan to remove the Prime Alliance and give the rest of the field the fair chance of "playing this through the end".
You in?
Bad answer. There's only one beneficial strategy to go forward with. Unless... y'know...juliets wrote: ↑Sun Nov 05, 2017 6:10 pmI haven't decided yet what strategy is best for me for Stage 2. I'll be considering different options.Ricochet wrote: ↑Sun Nov 05, 2017 5:20 pmThat is understandable.juliets wrote: ↑Sun Nov 05, 2017 5:04 pmPlease take into consideration that I am still in the hospital and kind of out of it a lot of the time leaving it difficult for me to concentrate. I do not mean to be inactive it's just my situation is a little difficult. The past 48 hours have been particularly hard. I'm very interested in playing this through to the end. It looks like I will be leaving the hospital early in the week and I'm hopeful I will be more available.sig wrote: ↑Sun Nov 05, 2017 4:54 pmPlayers who haven't posted in like forever, if they don't have any posts in say the last 72+ hours they're inactive for sure, I'd say even in the last 36 hours unless they specify in thread they're busy. This is imo, just a way to trim the fat and get ride of the players who aren't even playing the game. Plus its more polite then lynching people who are active and want to win and leaving alive people who are inactive and don't want to win for longer.
We can always stick to the plan to remove the Prime Alliance and give the rest of the field the fair chance of "playing this through the end".
You in?
Why do you think I ever had any ties with the Primes? In fact I've only had contact with two people who were/are primes. Now if you really want to win you need to figure out who isn't a prime then have all the other teams direct their kills at prime players who I'd say are fairly obvious. Plus use your role properly. And I'll be up front mine sucks now and can't do much of anything, but I'm not on the primes team.....maybe.Ricochet wrote: ↑Sun Nov 05, 2017 5:27 pmHow about fuck politeness?sig wrote: ↑Sun Nov 05, 2017 4:54 pmPlayers who haven't posted in like forever, if they don't have any posts in say the last 72+ hours they're inactive for sure, I'd say even in the last 36 hours unless they specify in thread they're busy. This is imo, just a way to trim the fat and get ride of the players who aren't even playing the game. Plus its more polite then lynching people who are active and want to win and leaving alive people who are inactive and don't want to win for longer.
This is Dead or Alive + LTS, meaning inactives will win or lose anyway if the rest of their team win or lose the game.
A better goal for this endgame is to remove the freemasons who think so highly of themselves and their allied scheming and duel afterwards in an equitable fashion.
Are you done having ties or any affinities with the Primes, since you got nightkilled, or do I need to label you as a threat, come D25.
Don't we have one?Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Sun Nov 05, 2017 6:56 pm If we still those inactives, they sre just changing roles tho. If my math is correct we should have 3 roles left to activate. So what is the point?
The OP says 7 so I don't know.sig wrote: ↑Sun Nov 05, 2017 6:56 pmDon't we have one?Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Sun Nov 05, 2017 6:56 pm If we still those inactives, they sre just changing roles tho. If my math is correct we should have 3 roles left to activate. So what is the point?