oop, Golden also started by quoting another post.
Ruh roh raggy
oop, Golden also started by quoting another post.
I seriously cracked up reading this.
>reads this
ok, this only ever comes from mafia.
They’re still in the tail end of {vote} tags, like a small, squatty little man whispering it.
The grammar police role is mafia. Making typos does not benefit town.Scotty wrote: ↑Sun Oct 23, 2022 10:27 pm That being said, I actually think sig coming out and throwing caution to the wind with regards to his spelling and grammar is townie, if not reckless. Could be WIFOM, but that role is incredibly restrictive to my *vibe* which comes with autocorrect errors and incomplete sentences. So I get it.
thanks professor.Sloonei wrote: ↑Sun Oct 23, 2022 11:07 pmThe grammar police role is mafia. Making typos does not benefit town.Scotty wrote: ↑Sun Oct 23, 2022 10:27 pm That being said, I actually think sig coming out and throwing caution to the wind with regards to his spelling and grammar is townie, if not reckless. Could be WIFOM, but that role is incredibly restrictive to my *vibe* which comes with autocorrect errors and incomplete sentences. So I get it.
I will now forever imagine a little man creepily whispering "aubergine" every time I see someone's vote. Thank you for that. It will be like my very own sweaty, bald, Peeping Tom stalker in every mafia game I read.
Valid point indeed! But the civvies have an adverb checker, so we should play it old school like when lie detector roles were still in vogue and pressure everyone to post a unique adverb. Anyone who resists must die.Sloonei wrote: ↑Sun Oct 23, 2022 11:07 pmThe grammar police role is mafia. Making typos does not benefit town.Scotty wrote: ↑Sun Oct 23, 2022 10:27 pm That being said, I actually think sig coming out and throwing caution to the wind with regards to his spelling and grammar is townie, if not reckless. Could be WIFOM, but that role is incredibly restrictive to my *vibe* which comes with autocorrect errors and incomplete sentences. So I get it.
IndubitablyG-Man wrote: ↑Sun Oct 23, 2022 11:15 pmValid point indeed! But the civvies have an adverb checker, so we should play it old school like when lie detector roles were still in vogue and pressure everyone to post a unique adverb. Anyone who resists must die.Sloonei wrote: ↑Sun Oct 23, 2022 11:07 pmThe grammar police role is mafia. Making typos does not benefit town.Scotty wrote: ↑Sun Oct 23, 2022 10:27 pm That being said, I actually think sig coming out and throwing caution to the wind with regards to his spelling and grammar is townie, if not reckless. Could be WIFOM, but that role is incredibly restrictive to my *vibe* which comes with autocorrect errors and incomplete sentences. So I get it.
I’ll try to slyly coax adverbs out of everybody.G-Man wrote: ↑Sun Oct 23, 2022 11:15 pmValid point indeed! But the civvies have an adverb checker, so we should play it old school like when lie detector roles were still in vogue and pressure everyone to post a unique adverb. Anyone who resists must die.Sloonei wrote: ↑Sun Oct 23, 2022 11:07 pmThe grammar police role is mafia. Making typos does not benefit town.Scotty wrote: ↑Sun Oct 23, 2022 10:27 pm That being said, I actually think sig coming out and throwing caution to the wind with regards to his spelling and grammar is townie, if not reckless. Could be WIFOM, but that role is incredibly restrictive to my *vibe* which comes with autocorrect errors and incomplete sentences. So I get it.
A word that modifies a verb descriptively
Good morning, am I late for the English class?
Interesting that I had a similar thought during one of my latest games a month ago or so.Scotty wrote: ↑Sun Oct 23, 2022 10:09 pm History would dictate that I should vote a no-poster here, but history also says you shouldn’t march on Russia in the winter. I think that’s crock, see? You just have to wear thicker outer layers and bring more rations. I have it all figured out! While other poindexters might put their head down and wait until summer to make an offensive push on the oppressive czar of the day, I confidently proclaim “naw,” get on my bike and ride forth, baby. Instead of following the narrative “learn from the past’s mistakes,” I choose to “make mistakes in the future.” I choose to never make new beginnings by always postponing the endings.
Life is a haiku made up of an infinite spew of lines.
Anyway, [VOTE: Bea] aubergine
Could you elaborate on the why ?
Are you flamboyantly declaring your intent to dastardly sacrifice yourself spectacularly ?DharmaHelper wrote: ↑Mon Oct 24, 2022 5:02 am I swear to God I'm going to ascend to Modhood just to modkill myself if another mothertrucker says aubergine one more time.
This happened:Vivax wrote: ↑Mon Oct 24, 2022 5:24 amAre you flamboyantly declaring your intent to dastardly sacrifice yourself spectacularly ?DharmaHelper wrote: ↑Mon Oct 24, 2022 5:02 am I swear to God I'm going to ascend to Modhood just to modkill myself if another mothertrucker says aubergine one more time.
What happened to the last person that tried to feed you vegetable soup ?
Yeah if only there were a role that explicitly stated (hey look guys, adverb. I'm multitasking!) that votes were changeable.Elohcin wrote: ↑Sun Oct 23, 2022 10:21 pmI would say it is something to consider.
I'm not a fan of changing votes. I like to take the day to interact and observe without being hasty.
Sig says votes are changeable. I don't see how he could have known this before voting. I can only find him sus right away as his hasty vote would most likely land on a civ.
It’s also only a one shot, so not a big deal.Sloonei wrote: ↑Sun Oct 23, 2022 11:07 pmThe grammar police role is mafia. Making typos does not benefit town.Scotty wrote: ↑Sun Oct 23, 2022 10:27 pm That being said, I actually think sig coming out and throwing caution to the wind with regards to his spelling and grammar is townie, if not reckless. Could be WIFOM, but that role is incredibly restrictive to my *vibe* which comes with autocorrect errors and incomplete sentences. So I get it.
An Ad verb is a very that’s fallen for capitalism and started to advertise its verbyness.
I will HAPPILY use an adverb, but it may take me a while to get used to the vote tag thing. Have patience.
So, rule number 5 says the "votes are changeable. MAYBE." Then, I did read the roles including Moveable Votes, but didn't understand it. I was looking at it like a RULE and not a ROLE, probably b/c I had been in the car all day traveling. But I just had a lightbulb moment looking back at it now after a good night's sleep! So, I definitely get it now.DharmaHelper wrote: ↑Mon Oct 24, 2022 5:48 amYeah if only there were a role that explicitly stated (hey look guys, adverb. I'm multitasking!) that votes were changeable.Elohcin wrote: ↑Sun Oct 23, 2022 10:21 pmI would say it is something to consider.
I'm not a fan of changing votes. I like to take the day to interact and observe without being hasty.
Sig says votes are changeable. I don't see how he could have known this before voting. I can only find him sus right away as his hasty vote would most likely land on a civ.
Maybe Eloh missed that part, though. I guess if it were an indie role or a mafia role, and Eloh were a civ and had no reason to read up on the mafia/indie sides of things, that could be it.
But if that role were not an indie or mafia role, and Eloh were a mafia or an indie and would have reason to be more focused on that side of the board, I could see a world where Eloh might forgo reading up on the civ side of things.
Elohcin wrote: ↑Mon Oct 24, 2022 8:49 amI will HAPPILY use an adverb, but it may take me a while to get used to the vote tag thing. Have patience.
So, rule number 5 says the "votes are changeable. MAYBE." Then, I did read the roles including Moveable Votes, but didn't understand it. I was looking at it like a RULE and not a ROLE, probably b/c I had been in the car all day traveling. But I just had a lightbulb moment looking back at it now after a good night's sleep! So, I definitely get it now.DharmaHelper wrote: ↑Mon Oct 24, 2022 5:48 amYeah if only there were a role that explicitly stated (hey look guys, adverb. I'm multitasking!) that votes were changeable.Elohcin wrote: ↑Sun Oct 23, 2022 10:21 pmI would say it is something to consider.
I'm not a fan of changing votes. I like to take the day to interact and observe without being hasty.
Sig says votes are changeable. I don't see how he could have known this before voting. I can only find him sus right away as his hasty vote would most likely land on a civ.
Maybe Eloh missed that part, though. I guess if it were an indie role or a mafia role, and Eloh were a civ and had no reason to read up on the mafia/indie sides of things, that could be it.
But if that role were not an indie or mafia role, and Eloh were a mafia or an indie and would have reason to be more focused on that side of the board, I could see a world where Eloh might forgo reading up on the civ side of things.
I no longer suspect sig atm. We shall see what's to come.
methinks the baker might be baking up some sugar-free excuses hereDharmaHelper wrote: ↑Mon Oct 24, 2022 8:55 amElohcin wrote: ↑Mon Oct 24, 2022 8:49 amI will HAPPILY use an adverb, but it may take me a while to get used to the vote tag thing. Have patience.
So, rule number 5 says the "votes are changeable. MAYBE." Then, I did read the roles including Moveable Votes, but didn't understand it. I was looking at it like a RULE and not a ROLE, probably b/c I had been in the car all day traveling. But I just had a lightbulb moment looking back at it now after a good night's sleep! So, I definitely get it now.DharmaHelper wrote: ↑Mon Oct 24, 2022 5:48 amYeah if only there were a role that explicitly stated (hey look guys, adverb. I'm multitasking!) that votes were changeable.Elohcin wrote: ↑Sun Oct 23, 2022 10:21 pmI would say it is something to consider.
I'm not a fan of changing votes. I like to take the day to interact and observe without being hasty.
Sig says votes are changeable. I don't see how he could have known this before voting. I can only find him sus right away as his hasty vote would most likely land on a civ.
Maybe Eloh missed that part, though. I guess if it were an indie role or a mafia role, and Eloh were a civ and had no reason to read up on the mafia/indie sides of things, that could be it.
But if that role were not an indie or mafia role, and Eloh were a mafia or an indie and would have reason to be more focused on that side of the board, I could see a world where Eloh might forgo reading up on the civ side of things.
I no longer suspect sig atm. We shall see what's to come.
My only town read so far is Scotty. I don’t have a baddie read yet. Stay tuned.
Epignosis wrote:If llama is good, it means we exist in a universe in which multitasking llama can call out the first of two mafia while simultaneously calling out two civilians.
I don't want to live in that universe.
No mercy for the cakemaker!
Epignosis wrote:If llama is good, it means we exist in a universe in which multitasking llama can call out the first of two mafia while simultaneously calling out two civilians.
I don't want to live in that universe.
I do not like this post, nor do I like the vote for Bea. Mind you, I think voting for Bea in general is reasonable because people always tend to trust her, which makes her dangerous on the occasions when she is mafia, but Axey’s vote came without explanation and was a pile on after a (marginally) more justified vote.NotAnAxehole wrote: ↑Sun Oct 23, 2022 10:28 pm I have an idea of who the mafia is, but it's not who I'm voting at the moment. Though, the person I'm voting may also be mafia, who knows.
Epignosis wrote:If llama is good, it means we exist in a universe in which multitasking llama can call out the first of two mafia while simultaneously calling out two civilians.
I don't want to live in that universe.
[VOTE: Scotty] aubergine while I appreciate you, copyright infringement is a supersrs crime.
*Lick*sig wrote: ↑Sat Oct 22, 2022 10:11 pmAlso given my tendency to not A. Double check my posts 2. Care about grammar that much and C to play on my phone this role definitely feels targeted against me.Spacedaisy wrote: ↑Fri Oct 21, 2022 2:29 pm
Pedantic Pink
Gets a one shot role check, but they can only use it on someone who has made a grammatical or spelling error. You must quote the post where the error can be found in your night target PM to the host. If your chosen post does not actually contain an error, your role check fails and it cannot be used again.