The Syndicate

nijuukyugou wrote:

AVENGE ME!!

Captain Bunny Killer wrote:

>SpaghettiEverywhere wrote:Look, guys, right now what i'm seeing is a bunch of people going for boogs and i dont really see why. Yeah, youre all saying a bunch of silly things like "oh, but snow dog! he didnt even mention snow dog while he was jailed!" so what? so what that he votes someone other that who he says is his top suspect? everybody does it all the friggin time. right now i'm just seeing a hate train against boogs and i dont like it. Honestly its been going all game and this all just seems bad bad bad to me. and why was all this started? because someone suspected boogs faked being silenced. right. great work everyone. I wont be voting boogs. in fact, Ill be voting CBK, because you seem to be leading this train against boogs and i think youre bad.

Hey, lets leave hate out of this. It's a game, spaghetti.

This has been going on all game, because Boogs has been all over the place all game. This isnt the first time that he's conveniently jumped on a civ lynch bandwagon. And, unless I'm really mistaken, that's classic baddie, especially when you had other suspicions. And the original case against him had nothing to do with wild theories about faking a silence (it's actually quite amazing that that keeps coming up and makes me think his baddie teammates are taking advantage of it). The original case was that he repeatedly either missed a vote or voted elsewhere and then tried to claim suspicion of an already lynched baddie which he never mentioned before said baddie had died (I made detailed posts about this). On top of that, he didn't start offering suspicions of his own until people started voting for him for jumping on other suspicions. Then it was all "Hey that was a freakin weird lynch and a I bet a bunch of those voting for me were teammies trying to save elo (even though that didn't make sense), and hey lets start going after low-posters (which I know is sometimes a civ frustration, but it's also classic baddie 101).

Seriously? You don't think any of that could indicate baddiness? I'll admit that his defenses have made sense a couple of times, but it's in the middle of a bunch of stuff that doesn't make sense at all, almost like someone was helping him clean up his messes. Then people keep coming around and saying, "Boy, I really don't get this Boogs thing... Something about a fake silence? Nah, I don't see it."

Scrambling much? I'm sure there's a civ out there who doubts it, so, unlike you, I'm not going to assume you're bad (although, I would point out that you were another on the vomps train).

Yes, I am civ, and I am trying to lead a lynch against Boogs. Yep, it would be bad if I'm totally wrong, but I tend to have a be sure and don't give up strategy. I think this is possibly the lead we need to finally hitting on the other goblin team, and the baddies are trying their darndest to dodge it.

So, I'll just go ahead and vote too.

*votes Boogs

Vompatti wrote:Would you believe me if I told you I was almost about to post that Eloh is almost certainly good and that it would be a huge mistake to lynch her and now that she turned out bad I'm glad I didn't post that because it would have made me look bad, q.m.

Captain Bunny Killer wrote:
No, that post where he claims that he still stands by the theory that there were baddie elo voters, even though he was wrong about elo. That changes nothing about you.

Metalmarsh89 wrote:Ok, I should be more active now. Sorry to see you go DFarady and sawyer.

As for who should pay the gold, maybe the people who decided to take the back gate (myself included). 12 of the 13 can offer 50 gold apiece? I think that sounds fair.

Russtifinko wrote:

DFaraday wrote:Here is my Wood Elf submission, which will only make sense to people familiar with both the Hobbit and Pushing Daisies.

I give you Ned, King of the Woodland Pie Shop:

I cant see your picture! Anyone else having that issue?

Lizzy wrote:^ Dude, I miss your painty stuff. You should illustrate daily events again k.

Russtifinko wrote:

CONTEST ANNOUNCEMENT:
Create something Wood-Elf related. It has to be your own work (no GIFs), but paint, Paint, crayon, chalk, cake, your belly button lint, or any other medium is allowed. Post in-thread (or link to it if it won't post). Top prize is 300 gold and 15 Wood-Elf Points, runner-up is 200 and 10, and third place gets 100 and 5.

Epignosis wrote:

Dom wrote:

Epignosis wrote:

Dom wrote:

Epignosis wrote:My general philosophy is this: Unless there is a clear, civilian reason someone survived a lynch (not a Night kill), lynch that person again right away in the next poll.

However, I think Mongoose is Smaug, and Bard needs to do whatever he can do on that front.

Why do you think she is Smaug?

Do you have a reason to suggest that she isn't? If so, please- help me out.

Why is the burden of proof on the person being open minded and not the one coming to an early conclusion?

Fair enough.

She survived a lynch. Smaug can likely do that.

Any reason you think she isn't that role?

Mongoose wrote: "Remember when we lynched civs 3 days in a row?".