Tranq has 44 posts here, compared to 83 in RM3 when he was recruited bad Night 3 (and killed by another team Night 7). Despite the post count, I'm detecting a consistent tone. In RM3, every other posts of his has a

Moderator: Community Team
Then you could try voting Tranq.nutella wrote:I'm voting for bwt because I thought boomslang was bad for a while and haven't been feeling good about him lately. I also wouldn't be surprised if tranq was bad.
I'm glad you posted this, as a matter of fact. Analyzing it linguistically, it's rotten. Regarding bwt, you "haven't been feeling good about him lately."nutella wrote:I'm voting for bwt because I thought boomslang was bad for a while and haven't been feeling good about him lately. I also wouldn't be surprised if tranq was bad.
That's it. Please tell me what is bothering you.birdwithteeth11 wrote:Sorry everyone. Just realized I had replaced back into this game. Too tired to read anything tonight, but I'll start catching up again tomorrow afternoon/evening after work.
ˆSpacedaisy wrote:Bwt replaced boomslang. I believe boomslang was bad. He was already under suspicion from players, then Night 9s came along and Ahriman attempted to kill 2 people, DH and boomslang. Both failed. It has generally been agreed upon that DH would be a freaking weird choice of kill for Ahriman, all things considered. I had looked over the list to see if there was a reason that Ahriman might have ended up with two kills showing up in one night. The only thing I could see was that Boomslang (because I am operating under the belief that Ahriman wouldn't have targeted DH) might be either the jilted lover or the warden. We know now that Gman was the jilted lover in his previous incarnation,so we can scratch that. So if he was the warden, and the power was used by him, targeting DH seems like a decidedly baddie move. Then the only sense I can make of Roxy's weirdness over the restarted night was that she was trying to obfuscate the truth about what occurred in order to provide some cover for boom/bwt. I really think this would be the best choice for a lynch today.
Given nutella's last post, has your opinion of her changed?Spacedaisy wrote:What word did you have in mind?
No, it doesn't clear him. But, again, Henry Fonda style...reasonable doubt and all.Spacedaisy wrote:I think she is likely bad. I've gone back and forth about her all game, but lately I have felt mostly bad vibes where she is concerned and she and tranq jumping on makes me feel even more. However, there are also two bad teams, so it doesn't clear bwt IMO.
I agree with your suspicion completely, but I think we should at least try to zero in on a couple people rather than spread it out all over. If devin would be one of those then yes I would consider it.the same goes for Nutella, and clearly bwt. Tranq would be an option to me too.Canucklehead wrote:Is anyone willing to consider a Devin vote??
I just went and glanced through his posts, and they are why wibblyest, most non-committal things I've ever seen.....EXCEPT for the Bubbles vote day, which looks like a sort of half-hearted distancing attempt by Bubbles....
Other people should have a look and tell me what they think
You have no concrete evidence for bwt. If you had concrete evidence all the time, Mafia ceases to be Mafia and you might as well play Tetris.Spacedaisy wrote:I agree with your suspicion completely, but I think we should at least try to zero in on a couple people rather than spread it out all over. If devin would be one of those then yes I would consider it.the same goes for Nutella, and clearly bwt. Tranq would be an option to me too.Canucklehead wrote:Is anyone willing to consider a Devin vote??
I just went and glanced through his posts, and they are why wibblyest, most non-committal things I've ever seen.....EXCEPT for the Bubbles vote day, which looks like a sort of half-hearted distancing attempt by Bubbles....
Other people should have a look and tell me what they think
Linki @ Epi: you have no more concrete evidence for Nutella, so I'm really not understanding why you have hesitance regarding bwt. I would consider a Nutella vote, but I am not ready to commit to that yet.
Then I was wrong and we try again, that is the risk that is run in every lynch. I'm aware there isn't hard and fast evidence for bwt, I've never claimed there was. what answer are you looking for from me here?Epignosis wrote:You have no concrete evidence for bwt. If you had concrete evidence all the time, Mafia ceases to be Mafia and you might as well play Tetris.Spacedaisy wrote:I agree with your suspicion completely, but I think we should at least try to zero in on a couple people rather than spread it out all over. If devin would be one of those then yes I would consider it.the same goes for Nutella, and clearly bwt. Tranq would be an option to me too.Canucklehead wrote:Is anyone willing to consider a Devin vote??
I just went and glanced through his posts, and they are why wibblyest, most non-committal things I've ever seen.....EXCEPT for the Bubbles vote day, which looks like a sort of half-hearted distancing attempt by Bubbles....
Other people should have a look and tell me what they think
Linki @ Epi: you have no more concrete evidence for Nutella, so I'm really not understanding why you have hesitance regarding bwt. I would consider a Nutella vote, but I am not ready to commit to that yet.
No, I have no more concrete evidence for Nutella. I looked at her more closely because she posted something that, in my opinion, was flimsy and weak. I now believe she should be lynched.
If you lynch bwt, and he comes back not bad, what then?
"Whoopsie" isn't it. I 100% believe you have a side. If it's a bad side, then fine. Ignore me. But if it's not a bad side, then "I would consider voting elsewhere" would be a nice start.Spacedaisy wrote:Then I was wrong and we try again, that is the risk that is run in every lynch. I'm aware there isn't hard and fast evidence for bwt, I've never claimed there was. what answer are you looking for from me here?Epignosis wrote:You have no concrete evidence for bwt. If you had concrete evidence all the time, Mafia ceases to be Mafia and you might as well play Tetris.Spacedaisy wrote:I agree with your suspicion completely, but I think we should at least try to zero in on a couple people rather than spread it out all over. If devin would be one of those then yes I would consider it.the same goes for Nutella, and clearly bwt. Tranq would be an option to me too.Canucklehead wrote:Is anyone willing to consider a Devin vote??
I just went and glanced through his posts, and they are why wibblyest, most non-committal things I've ever seen.....EXCEPT for the Bubbles vote day, which looks like a sort of half-hearted distancing attempt by Bubbles....
Other people should have a look and tell me what they think
Linki @ Epi: you have no more concrete evidence for Nutella, so I'm really not understanding why you have hesitance regarding bwt. I would consider a Nutella vote, but I am not ready to commit to that yet.
No, I have no more concrete evidence for Nutella. I looked at her more closely because she posted something that, in my opinion, was flimsy and weak. I now believe she should be lynched.
If you lynch bwt, and he comes back not bad, what then?
I know you did, but I don't think I've read enough to say an intelligent enough thing to get you to vote someone else. I do feel like I'm right about nutella. Her verb tense made it sound like new bwt has done something suspicious, but he hasn't. So she voted for him.Spacedaisy wrote:I did say I would consider voting elsewhere, more than once in the last handful of posts.
I'm grabbing a neon pen now.Spacedaisy wrote:Alright Epi. You know what, I trust you. I don't understand you right now, but I trust you. Mark this day on your calendar. I will switch my vote to Nutella.
vote registered for Nutella
And if she flips bad, tranq should be a serious contender for a lynch.
Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Wed Dec 16, 2020 7:33 pm Just how many days of "let's yeet them tomorrow" can a mafioso survive?
The answer: all of them, if you are a marmot.
So would you care to join us in a Nutella vote?Metalmarsh89 wrote:I have not trusted anybody for a while now so I my options are currently open to vote for anyone.
Epignosis wrote:Bitch, my identity is my identity theft protection!
Epignosis wrote:Bitch, my identity is my identity theft protection!
Sure. I'm here to appease you afterall.Spacedaisy wrote:So would you care to join us in a Nutella vote?Metalmarsh89 wrote:I have not trusted anybody for a while now so I my options are currently open to vote for anyone.
Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Wed Dec 16, 2020 7:33 pm Just how many days of "let's yeet them tomorrow" can a mafioso survive?
The answer: all of them, if you are a marmot.
I'm not sure what that even means, but cool.Metalmarsh89 wrote:Sure. I'm here to appease you afterall.Spacedaisy wrote:So would you care to join us in a Nutella vote?Metalmarsh89 wrote:I have not trusted anybody for a while now so I my options are currently open to vote for anyone.![]()
Why are people voting for birdwithteeth?
Interesting.Spacedaisy wrote:I'm not sure what that even means, but cool.Metalmarsh89 wrote:Sure. I'm here to appease you afterall.Spacedaisy wrote:So would you care to join us in a Nutella vote?Metalmarsh89 wrote:I have not trusted anybody for a while now so I my options are currently open to vote for anyone.![]()
Why are people voting for birdwithteeth?
I made a convincing case, they already suspected boomslang for being shady anyway. Now Epi has convinced me to vote Nutella instead though. In a nut shell.
Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Wed Dec 16, 2020 7:33 pm Just how many days of "let's yeet them tomorrow" can a mafioso survive?
The answer: all of them, if you are a marmot.
Then maybe I'll switch my vote to give your vote zero responsibility.Devin the Omniscient wrote:'Bout #*&$@ING time!
For the record I would have been the second vote for nutella. I am not voting there because SD is there
I'm ready for a change of pace. I hope you'remember right Epi. But I take full responsibility for my vote either way.
Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Wed Dec 16, 2020 7:33 pm Just how many days of "let's yeet them tomorrow" can a mafioso survive?
The answer: all of them, if you are a marmot.
Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Wed Dec 16, 2020 7:33 pm Just how many days of "let's yeet them tomorrow" can a mafioso survive?
The answer: all of them, if you are a marmot.
Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Wed Dec 16, 2020 7:33 pm Just how many days of "let's yeet them tomorrow" can a mafioso survive?
The answer: all of them, if you are a marmot.
Power play there?Metalmarsh89 wrote:Vote registered for birdwithteeth
Look what you've done Epignosis, you've created a monster.
I was going to buy bean dip and wrap it up and give it to MP as a present but we were almost late to the wedding and I think of things last minute.Spacedaisy wrote:you know what is funny? This bean dip thing became a thing here and has been for months without me even knowing it. I inadvertently created an inside joke and without even knowing it!!
Also, there is bean dip in my fridge at this very moment.
Epignosis wrote:I was going to buy bean dip and wrap it up and give it to MP as a present but we were almost late to the wedding and I think of things last minute.Spacedaisy wrote:you know what is funny? This bean dip thing became a thing here and has been for months without me even knowing it. I inadvertently created an inside joke and without even knowing it!!
Also, there is bean dip in my fridge at this very moment.
Epignosis wrote:I was going to buy bean dip and wrap it up and give it to MP as a present but we were almost late to the wedding and I think of things last minute.Spacedaisy wrote:you know what is funny? This bean dip thing became a thing here and has been for months without me even knowing it. I inadvertently created an inside joke and without even knowing it!!
Also, there is bean dip in my fridge at this very moment.