No we were at homeElohcin wrote:Are y'all the kind of family that likes to go and do stuff all weekend? haha, Epi and I are usually happy to stay home and rest all day on Saturday.
Lots of laundry, cooking, and
Cleaning baby toys
Moderator: Community Team
No we were at homeElohcin wrote:Are y'all the kind of family that likes to go and do stuff all weekend? haha, Epi and I are usually happy to stay home and rest all day on Saturday.
It's a koala-ity curseG-Man wrote:S~V~S has the
Utmost adorable curse
That I've ever seen
It is just my observation re lack of interest when you don't have BTSC, and it could be very wrong; I should have koala-fied it that way. But my observations on you point towards you being civ, to my mind, so don't argue my points too hard, lol.Elohcin wrote:What you think is untrue. I am more involved in speed games where I can get my head around what is going on and keep up. I am less involved in big games b/c I have trouble keeping up. However, since 2016 has begun, I have only been in small games (except for one) and I have been equally involved in all of those small games whether good or bad.S~V~S wrote:
Linki ~ I think Eloh is more involved when she is bad. When she is civ she tends to lose interest unless she has BTSC.
As for the tunneling. Yes, I perceived Wilgy's actions as tunneling. It was only until I pointed it out, then he backed off a bit. But, that doesn't change the fact that it was tunneling to begin with and I stick by my theory. If Matt turns out to be bad, then I am almost sure that Wilgy is too.
@SVS, were you in the last game with Matt and me when he tunneled me? I have seen Matt tunnel, but I have never seen ANYONE tunnel like Matt did in that last game. He gets my vote, I don't plan on moving it.
You are right that I don't like the way the game is going. I love some lightheartedness in games. I like to hear how people are doing and what's new in their lives. I like joking around a bit. But I also like people to take the game seriously. I think its a waste of my time when players act stupidly or don't care. I think it's disrespectful to the host as well, who has put time into the making of the game. And I know you aren't criticizing. I think you've made a pretty good observation. However, I think I have become a better player this year (taking on only small games) and I think my "poker face" is better. I still don't know how Epi can always seem to read me, but I think my playing has become more neutral and I have less of a baddie vs civ game and more consistency whether I have BTSC or not. At least I like to think soS~V~S wrote:
Sure there is such a thing as civ behavior for individuals. Some more so than others depending on the situation. For the most part (everyone has exceptions) happy jolly joking Eloh has good BTSC; could be civ, could be bad. Cranky annoyed Eloh does not. This is mutually exclusive of tunneling. Based on this, not on tunneling, I would give only the bearest consideration to Eloh being bad. She seems annoyed in general with the way the thread is going (not a criticism, Eloh, just an observation) and whil I am OK with it, I can understand why.
Are y'all the kind of family that likes to go and do stuff all weekend? haha, Epi and I are usually happy to stay home and rest all day on Saturday.G-Man wrote:Sorry for absence
Getting harder to sneak time
In on the weekends
His defense of Matt was not only soft core, but strange. It boiled down to him saying he disliked the amount of votes on Matt, hinting that Matt wasn't scum since he had so many votes. However, Matt only had what 3 votes at that point? I viewed that as fear mongering.S~V~S wrote:I guess i was unclear, this happens em-bear-assingly often; sorry about that. What was off about his line of defense, and why would Matt flipping bad give you a stronger feel about DF?sig wrote:@Sorsha, I'm suspicious of MAtt not really of DF at the moment. However, his line of defense was odd?
This is really weak WIFOM reasoning. Since you've in the past defended me as mafia and civ you trying to get me lynched this game means you're right and I'm mafia? I doubt you'd defend me when I suspect you to be mafia or tried to get you lynched. This seems like such a mafia reason to vote for and try to push a lynch.Matt wrote: sig - Been no uing me since I sussed him. I pointed out to him that even when I'm bad, I always defend him against getting lynched early, and so it should be obvi that my suss of him was genuine but I suppose he doesn't gaf.
sig wrote:@HOSTS Was there a tie on the lynch poll last phase?
Dragon D. Luffy wrote: ↑Wed Dec 16, 2020 7:33 pm Just how many days of "let's yeet them tomorrow" can a mafioso survive?
The answer: all of them, if you are a marmot.
Perhaps this role issig wrote:hello I'm here. I see Matt is voting for me.
I believe I've already pointed this out, but I will again.
Kashira --- Kashira are Yubaba’s three bouncing and rolling pet heads. They grunt, but otherwise appear to be mute. --- Kashira may silently add a vote to any player during a lynch three times during the game.
Why didn't one more mafia member vote for matt and then use Kashira, or just use his power? The suspicion of llama would've no doubt faded. Also there was no movement by llama or really any player to lynch Matt over Llama. Llama only switched his vote last second to "save" himself. However, I believe this was done as a final distancing move when none of the other wagons took off.
Nah dude, I'm not saying I'm definitely right on you because in the past I don't like to lynch you early. But before, you said you didn't think I was being true about my suss on you (errr I think), and that's bogus.sig wrote:This is really weak WIFOM reasoning. Since you've in the past defended me as mafia and civ you trying to get me lynched this game means you're right and I'm mafia? I doubt you'd defend me when I suspect you to be mafia or tried to get you lynched. This seems like such a mafia reason to vote for and try to push a lynch.Matt wrote: sig - Been no uing me since I sussed him. I pointed out to him that even when I'm bad, I always defend him against getting lynched early, and so it should be obvi that my suss of him was genuine but I suppose he doesn't gaf.
Please reread my posts, I don't think I need to repeat myself.Matt wrote:
Elohcin - Can you tell me exactly why you've voted for me today? I've seen you refer to me tunneling people in other games, but I'm not sure what that has to do with this game?
You are right. Zebra was the one who tunneled me in R&B. Matt was a different game. I don't remember which one.Sorsha wrote:Eloh, are you thinking of when zebra tunneled you in Rocky & Bullwinkle?
The consequences could be grizzly.S~V~S wrote:Pandamoneum ensues
Ah yes, the game where I was so pleased you trusted me before you turned on me,lolElohcin wrote:Please reread my posts, I don't think I need to repeat myself.Matt wrote:
Elohcin - Can you tell me exactly why you've voted for me today? I've seen you refer to me tunneling people in other games, but I'm not sure what that has to do with this game?
And SVS, I believe it was Rocky and Bullwinkle. I wish I were better at remembering this kind of stuff.
freemasons right?S~V~S wrote:I may or may not leave my vote on Faraday just cause I can. We go back years, we were partners in his first or second game.
Gotta go take the dog out before she has a Kodiak Arrest, bbl.
Your game, Pixar. Sharks, Baby! I bearly rememeber which one I was, it was years ago.Dom wrote:freemasons right?S~V~S wrote:I may or may not leave my vote on Faraday just cause I can. We go back years, we were partners in his first or second game.
Gotta go take the dog out before she has a Kodiak Arrest, bbl.
So you want me to start acting like a nut like everyone else then?G-Man wrote:Call me crazy but
Eloh sorta sounds like she
Is trying too hard
Who are you suspicious of Sorsha?G-Man wrote:Sorsha was not sus
Of either Llama or Matt
This makes me go hmmm
Ok, Eloh's bad. Putting my vote back there.Elohcin wrote:So you want me to start acting like a nut like everyone else then?G-Man wrote:Call me crazy but
Eloh sorta sounds like she
Is trying too hard
DrWilgy wrote:Ok, Eloh's bad. Putting my vote back there.Elohcin wrote:So you want me to start acting like a nut like everyone else then?G-Man wrote:Call me crazy but
Eloh sorta sounds like she
Is trying too hard
It's just a feelingElohcin wrote:So you want me to start acting like a nut like everyone else then?G-Man wrote:Call me crazy but
Eloh sorta sounds like she
Is trying too hard
Yeah, that's pretty much what I meant.S~V~S wrote:Sure there is such a thing as civ behavior for individuals. Some more so than others depending on the situation. For the most part (everyone has exceptions) happy jolly joking Eloh has good BTSC; could be civ, could be bad. Cranky annoyed Eloh does not. This is mutually exclusive of tunneling. Based on this, not on tunneling, I would give only the bearest consideration to Eloh being bad. She seems annoyed in general with the way the thread is going (Quin wrote:I don't think there is such thing as 'civ behaviour', so I think it's pointless trying to discuss whether or not tunneling is civ behaviour or not.
If you're going to have that discussion, you should be asking whether a certain person would do this if they were civ. With that being said, other than my brief encounter with her in Turf Wars, I haven't played with Elohcin, so I have no idea whether she would or would not tunnel as she is.not a criticism, Eloh, just an observation) and whil I am OK with it, I can understand why.
@sig,no opinionon DF?
Part 2: The death of a LlamaElohcin wrote:So far I am seeing a lot of pointed fingers for what seem to be silly reasons and even silly thoughts about if this or that behavior means that person is bad. I'm not trying to pick on Matt here b/c there were others as well.
Matt wrote:
soneji, yeah, I made a role claiming joke about Scotty with his tying comment, but it really did ping me too.
Also, is G-Man the type of player who always has some fun on Day 0/1, or should we be worried that his Haiku thing is some kind of sinister plot to destroy the town? Hrm.So far I am reading LC and G-man as good. You had surgery? I hope everything is okay.G-Man wrote:I beg to differDrWilgy wrote:Idk, everytime I've asked I've been good so...Scotty wrote:Last time I asked that of you and I was bad.DrWilgy wrote:Chaos seeding - planting the seeds of chaos and disorder.
All I saw from you Mr LC was pushing something that would've been considered rule breaking. It's one thing to borderline rule break yourself but supporting the dorty actions of others just feels scummy.
Linki - Hi Scotty. Wanna team up again this game?
Does that mean you are bad this game?
@Elo ypu can't go wrong with a LC or G-Man vote...
Trying to recall if your
Civ game is this gruff
Wilgy, I see you voted for yourself. Why? I hate when people vote themselves. No offense, but I think its kind-of stupid. I usually end up voting for the person who voted himself.
exactly my thoughts as I read this.-Agrees with Llama, possibly validating a teammates banter.thellama73 wrote:Long Con, you are always so tricksy. I hope you are not tricking me today.Long Con wrote: I think Scotty is Civ. I think Long Con is a dangerous man to mess with.And also, Long Con is a Civ, so stop trying to lynch him please.
Back to misguided finger pointing, I think Wilgy seems the most wrong atm as I read through his posts.
I'm reading wah wah wah wah wah wah from sloon. -Claims all Sloon was doing was wah wah wah wah... when sloon was one of the leading pushers of teh Llama lynch. This is what had originally pinged me. Stating that Sloon was just wah wah-ing in the context of what the wah wah-ing really was means that Eloh was soft defending Llama here, without mentioning names.
I think wilgy is either misguided or bad. I think LC is a tricksy player but I am not seeing anything of too much concern so far. If you aren't seeing naything so far, why did you agree with Llama earlier? I think Matt is a nutthellama73 wrote:Looking forward to your input, Eloh. What do you think of Wilgy, Long Con, Matt, Sloonei, and Soreji in particular?Elohcin wrote:We are back home from our mini vacation. I'm exhausted and injured, but had a wonderful time. I will catch up now.
, definitely a toss-up. I think sloonei is sounding like Charlie Brown's teacher. Tossing the "Ignoring this player card" on the one confirmed civ we have now, who was also a Llama lynch supporter still. We really ought to come up with a catchy word/phrase for this type of behavior. Its when someone is posting and using good amount of words but isn't saying much at all. Soreji? Did I miss his/her posts?
You try staying active in the thread while at a kids museum with three little constantly looking in all directions, counting to three over and over again. We were having family time, sir. But I am home now with a stupid bruised coccyx. I am no longer a teenage, that's for sure :/ So I will have plenty of time to be involved as I lie here on my side with ice on my butt.G-Man wrote:Elochin absent
No fan of "I'm catching up"
Will cut slack today
SO I know this post wasn't super organized but more of a modge podge of my thoughts. But I have a three year old who keeps asking me to read him a book. So it is what it is.
Following Llama's death Eloh posts this. Now it's WIFOM to go into whether or not what Eloh would've done, but what part I believe is true is the fact Eloh wasn't here. If she is triple head bro, it would make sense that Llama wasn't saved.Elohcin wrote:Wow. Awesome result. I am also glad I was not around at the end. I may have voted to save llama b/c I am easily tricked by him.
This is when I feel Eloh truly hit hyper tunneler mode, even before the declaration of intent to tunnel. Feels bad to me considering my theory from earlier which I re-explain later.Elohcin wrote:DrWilgy wrote:*submits kill onto Matt*Is it wrong that I was to lynch wilgy and Matt even if they AREN'T bad?Matt wrote:Wilgy, gimme a name and I'll submit it.
So, notice between the past two quotes. Eloh had shifted from "Even if they aren't bad" to "bad bad bad and bad bad bad" I don't think the "Even if they aren't bad" was needed in the previous post, and was a contradiction caused by a baddies forced perspective that happened to slip into the thread.Elohcin wrote:DrWilgy wrote:GOT iT!!! sriracha is a non-commital type of baddIE!!Sorsha wrote:Nothing. It was a throw away vote on someone who had no votes. Sorry if you're civ but I didn't want to get involved in the close vote/ tie situation.thellama73 wrote:What does DF have to do with any of this?
Games solved! Lets eat CAKE!!!
Okay this is my theory. I think Matt is bad bad bad. I think Wilgy is bad bad bad. Last game I was in with Matt he was bad. He tunneled me like nothing I've ever seen before. Anyone remember that? He talked about no one and nothing by getting me lynched. I think he and Wilgy are bad together and I think he has convinced Wilgy in BTSC to tunnel me this game. I am voting Matt today. If he isn;t lynched, I will vote him tomorrow. And the next day. And once he is lynched I will go after Wilgy. If you hate that I am going to play the game this way, hate it. I don't care. I REALLY think I am right about this and I am not letting Matt survive all game as a baddie again.
While it's not hostile at first glance, this is simply a threat on G-Man. Eloh is stating here in reaction to suspicion: "Do you want me to put you in the same baddie bin as Matt and Wilgy?" to dissuade G-man from pursuing.Elohcin wrote:So you want me to start acting like a nut like everyone else then?G-Man wrote:Call me crazy but
Eloh sorta sounds like she
Is trying too hard
I don't have any strong feelings on many right now.Elohcin wrote:Who are you suspicious of Sorsha?G-Man wrote:Sorsha was not sus
Of either Llama or Matt
This makes me go hmmm
Was this it?Matt wrote:Haha I totally should but I get annoyed myself when I'm investing so much in a game and then others are barely playing and they use rl as an excuse, just like "whatevs you signed up dude, play". But anyway, yeah, sorry dude, next time I'll post lots more.
My first game was Heroes, I was teamed with Dom and Illy, iirc. I don't remember playing Pixar at all.S~V~S wrote:Your game, Pixar. Sharks, Baby! I bearly rememeber which one I was, it was years ago.Dom wrote:freemasons right?S~V~S wrote:I may or may not leave my vote on Faraday just cause I can. We go back years, we were partners in his first or second game.
Gotta go take the dog out before she has a Kodiak Arrest, bbl.