Matt wrote:Random thoughts -
I'd like to lynch either Obscure or Rico. They have both been super shady, and I'm not entirely sure why people have civ reads of them. I'm a little more hesitant on OA since my troubles this past day phase, but still.
What am I shady for? Can you point out anything besides what I've already said that it simply didn't satisfy your reasoning or it didn't follow with your plan? Can you make any single ISO-based read on me, by which I mean actions, votes and such, not just what you felt like it was a thorn in your side. I don't think you can, because I've done nothing that really counts as anti-town.
So let's talk if that's really intention, instead of "muh Rico disagree with me" and "muh claiming business". If I survive the Night, I'll be in deep shit tomorrow, so banter or discord votes are the last thing I'll need, the way you threw one at me the other Day.
Matt wrote:
I'd like people to either entertain sig's idea on a possible reverse of Glorfy/Epi or I'd like us to lynch sig. Either he's pushing a "theory" that he knows to be true, or he's effing bad. I don't see it another way.
I don't entertain the former idea. As for the latter, can we talk first about possible ways in which sig might have survived,
in addition to the Cylon-of-the-Day's survival, back on Day Six? Input first, votes later.
Matt wrote:
What do people think of sig's idea that Glorfy was good and Epi is bad? Why hasn't the Mafia(s?) terminated Epi?
No way to know, since we don't know the mafia's win conditions. It could be eliminate every opponent, in which case the question stands. It could be eliminate the humans, in which case the question is less relevant.
Matt wrote:Drumbeats...
On May 7th, you said...
DrumBeats wrote:Good:
JJJ
ika
G-Man
Toastery:
Rico
Vompatti
LoRab
FoS: Ricochet
Richochet has been arguably the most vocal player this game, but looking back, Ricochet has provided nothing with his/her many posts. The only thing Rico did was attempt to discredit basically every other post. This is a very proscum approach because its sole purpose is to reduce town information. Rico has not provided a single town/toaster read iirc. In all of those posts, there is no reason to have no reads at all imo. I don't know meta, so I can't judge based on that, but nothing about this behavior strikes me as protown.
On May 8th, you said...
DrumBeats wrote:Good:
JJJ
Ika
SVS - I don't know meta, but all of his posts have a genuine effort to help the town imo and he brings up a lot of good points.
Toaster:
Rico - Still seen no real reads or anything, just self-defense. This guy isn't even pinging my scumdar anymore, it's going loco everytime he posts.
G-Man - SVS's points on his post are incredibly valid imo. Summarizing is an easy way to feign information and I didn't notice that before.
Obscure/Vompetti - I really don't like how they both locked a vote for seemingly no reason.
On May 9th, you said...
DrumBeats wrote:I'm honestly feeling better about Rico now than I was yesterday.
And that was it.
Explanation?
Think you missed out the keywords "feeling better".
linki: jesus christ can I post