sig & radishes (from page 3 of sig's ISO on)
sig wrote: ↑Thu Feb 27, 2020 1:26 pm
[VOTE:
Nanook] aubergine
I'll potentially bite the bullet to stop a tie if it comes down to it, but like I've been saying he's my number one choice and just generally meh on Nutella/Jack.
I plan to read over Radish when I have time to form a more cohesive opinion. He does seem blendy/not super active and his Nanook connection troubles me.
sig continues to kick the can down the road on Radishes. He's yet to actually say anything substantive, which continues to look even worse in the light of baddie-gate. At least this post acknowledges some negativity around him.
Radishes is
incidentally named in a Michelle ISO. Okay.
A comprehensive reads list on which Radishes is listed under "Mafia lean". I am squinting my eyeballs at this post, sig. They are squinted very hard, so much so that my eyes are almost fully closed. I can't even see what I'm typing anymore. I'm also going to note for posterity that sabie is listed as a "civ lean" for, like, no reason.
Another incidental Radish namedrop, this time with implicit shade at people who voted for him. In a multiball game, chances are that every significant wagon is gonna have scum on it, honestly.
sig wrote: ↑Thu Feb 27, 2020 9:10 pm
Turnip Head wrote: ↑Thu Feb 27, 2020 8:54 pm
It's actually really funny that radishes is looking for scum in the Nutella wagon when he got just as many votes to be lynched
That struck me as odd also. I guess it removes the potential bias/OMGUS, but personally I'd look at my own wagon first especially it I was a civ.
This seems kinda like a more mafiaish thing so I'd like an explanation for why he started that way
On this historic occasion, sig acknowledges a point against Radishes in the Syndicate's 2019 Game of Champions. At least three other people had already expressed this opinion.
In one big post,
sig ISOs a handful of people at once. This post produces four hits when I ctrl+f "Radish". All four hits occur in quoted posts from the ISOee's, zero from sig's own analysis. Just stating facts.
sig wrote: ↑Fri Feb 28, 2020 8:03 pm
Dragomir wrote: ↑Fri Feb 28, 2020 7:59 pm
TonyStarkPrime wrote: ↑Fri Feb 28, 2020 7:40 pm
Dragomir wrote: ↑Fri Feb 28, 2020 7:26 pmHoly shit.
Here’s what’s up:
Uhh
Nothing it’s been really slow the large post count disguises this fact
So absolutely nothing of work has occurred?
I'd read the jack/nutella stuff maybe even though we know results idk what page it started on but that's where alot of people weighted in.
People are pretty scattered with reads, radish was a top suspect so maybe read him over as well.
I'd also suggest reading N1 onward for sure.
Greets Dragomir (now nutella), and in doing so he frames the Radish suspicion in the past tense. Noted. Sig also is instructing another player to review the case against Radishes. Sig has personally avoided that case like the
plague coronavirus.
In sig's
Day 2 wall post (which remains commendable regardless of sig's alignment), he lists Radishes under the "MAYBE LYNCH" heading, saying that he "talked about him already" with an implication that he did so in an ISO post. I may simply be missing something here, but I don't see any such ISO. What does this mean? He gives a couple other tentative nods of support to the radishes case as well, but hedges it a bit. I'm not loving this.
And that'll bit it for Radishes. I'll do sabie tomorrow. Definite compatibility here.
[mention]sig[/mention] big question that you can address is where exactly you laid out your thoughts on Radishes, as you suggested in your Day 2 post. I don't see that anywhere and it makes your stated suspicion against him look like a puff of smoke.